The Hands of the Cosmic Clock

Four postulates about the astrology

  1. There is no astrological causation on human events. The geocentric planetary placements in the tropical zodiac, and their cyclical angular configurations relative to zodiacal asterisms and other planets, do not determine collective or personal outcomes on planet Earth.
  2. Astrology is an archetypal language recognizing the multidimensionality, intra-dimensional variability, and polyvalence of astrological archetypes, thus underscoring their inherent indeterminism.
  3. The geocentric planetary placements in the tropical zodiac, and their cyclical angular configurations relative to zodiacal asterisms and other planets, may be poetically construed as a rich archetypal and metaphoric language providing meaning to human events.
  4. According to Jung’s synchronicity principle, planetary cycles may be narrated in an archetypal language conveying meaningful non-causal associations (meaningful coincidences) correlated with human events.

These four postulates about the psychological science of astrology do present different, yet somewhat overlapping perspectives. They are not entirely orthogonal, meaning they are not completely independent or unrelated to each other. Let’s analyze their relationships:

  1. Postulate 1 (No Astrological Causation): This postulate fundamentally contradicts the premise of astrology having any meaningful connection to human events, standing as a distinctly skeptical perspective.
  2. Postulate 2 (Astrology as Archetypal Language) and Postulate 3 (Astrology as Metaphoric Language): These two postulates can arguably be merged into one broader concept. Both view astrology as a symbolic language that provides meaning to human events through its archetypal representations. The main difference lies in the emphasis: Postulate 2 focuses on the multidimensionality and variability of astrological archetypes, while Postulate 3 emphasizes the poetic interpretation of these symbols.
  3. Postulate 4 (Jung’s Synchronicity Principle): This postulate introduces the concept of synchronicity, which is a unique perspective, but it also aligns with the notion of astrology as a symbolic language (Postulates 2 and 3). It could be seen as a specific application or interpretation of this symbolic language.

In order to achieve conceptual orthogonality, we could potentially merge Postulates 2, 3, and 4 into a single postulate that views astrology as a symbolic language that provides meaning to human events, with inherent multidimensionality, variability, and potential for revealing synchronistic connections. This leaves us with two orthogonal (yin-yang) postulates: one rejecting any astrological influence and one viewing astrology as a rich, symbolic framework for understanding human experience.


Astrological Archetypes and the Cosmic Clock: An Examination Through Four Postulates

Introduction:

Astrology, often seen as a pseudoscience, has been a part of human culture for centuries. Its archetypal language provides a rich narrative that helps us navigate life’s complexities. This first section of the essay explores the astrological archetypes of outer, slow-moving planets (Pluto, Neptune, Uranus (Prometheus), Saturn, and Jupiter) as hands of a cosmic clock through the lens of four postulates about the psychological science of astrology.

Astrological Archetypes and Their Roles:

The outer planets, often referred to as “transpersonal planets,” represent collective unconscious forces. Pluto symbolizes transformation and regeneration, Neptune represents dreams and illusions, Uranus (Prometheus) signifies individuality and revolution, Saturn embodies structure and discipline, and Jupiter denotes expansion and abundance1.

Postulate One: Lack of Astrological Influence on Human Events:

From the perspective of the first postulate, these planetary archetypes do not have a direct, causal impact on human events or personal outcomes. In this view, the significance of the synodic cycle of Pluto and Uranus since the 1960s, a period marked by intense cultural and societal upheaval, would be seen as coincidental rather than causally related to the planetary movements2.

Postulates Two and Three: Astrology as an Archetypal and Metaphoric Language:

The second and third postulates offer a different perspective, suggesting that the geocentric planetary placements in the tropical zodiac can be construed as a rich archetypal and metaphoric language providing meaning to human events. From this viewpoint, the synodic cycle of Pluto and Uranus can be interpreted as a symbolic narrative of transformative (Pluto) and revolutionary (Uranus) energies, reflecting the societal changes and cultural shifts of the 1960s3.

Postulate Four: Jung’s Synchronicity Principle:

The fourth postulate, based on Carl Jung’s synchronicity principle, posits that planetary cycles may be narrated in an archetypal language conveying meaningful non-causal associations correlated with human events. In this view, the Pluto-Uranus synodic cycle could be seen as synchronistically aligned with the cultural and societal upheaval of the 1960s, providing a meaningful narrative of these historical events4.

Conclusion:

The four postulates provide diverse perspectives on the psychological science of astrology, each offering unique insights into the interpretation of astrological archetypes and their correlation with human events. While they differ in their views on the direct influence of celestial bodies on human affairs, they all recognize the value of astrology as a symbolic language that can provide unique insights into the human experience.

Footnotes

  1. Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology
  2. Astrology and Science: An Examination of the Evidence, Paul R. Thagard
  3. An Introduction to Archetypal Astrological Analysis
  4. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle, Carl G. Jung

Astrological Archetypes of Outer Planets: The Hands of the Cosmic Clock

Introduction:

Astrology, often dismissed as pseudoscience, has been an integral part of human culture for centuries. Its archetypal language provides a rich tapestry of meanings that help us navigate the complexities of human life. This section explores the astrological archetypes of the outer, slow-moving planets (Pluto, Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, and Jupiter) and interprets them as hands of a cosmic clock.

Planetary Archetypes and Their Roles:

As already mentioned, the outer planets, often referred to as “transpersonal planets,” represent collective unconscious forces. Pluto symbolizes transformation and regeneration, Neptune represents dreams and illusions, Uranus signifies individuality and revolution, Saturn embodies structure and discipline, and Jupiter denotes expansion and abundance123.

The Significance of the Synodic Cycle of Pluto and Uranus:

The synodic cycle of Pluto and Uranus since the 1960s has been marked by periods of intense cultural and societal upheaval. These two planets represent transformation (Pluto) and revolution (Uranus). Their interactions have coincided with major shifts in societal norms and values, such as the civil rights movement, the sexual revolution, and significant technological advancements4.

The Looming Constitutional Crisis in the USA:

In the context of the upcoming 2024 US presidential election, the progression of these outer planets could indicate a potential constitutional crisis. The USA’s birth chart, based on the Gemini-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, shows Pluto in Capricorn, indicating a period of deconstruction and transformation of structures of power5. As Pluto moves into Aquarius, this could signify major breakthroughs and radical changes in societal structures, potentially leading to a constitutional crisis.

Pluto’s Return and Transition from Capricorn to Aquarius:

Pluto’s 248-year cycle coincides with its return to the same position it held during the USA’s birth. This “Pluto Return” signifies a time of deep transformation and upheaval. As Pluto moves from Capricorn to Aquarius, we can expect radical changes, breakthroughs, and perhaps even a reformation of societal structures56.

Outer Planets Changing Tropical Signs Around 2025:

The transition of most outer planets into new tropical signs around 2025 suggests a period of significant global change. Each planet’s shift into a new sign brings a shift in collective focus and challenges, potentially leading to major societal transformations7.

The 20-Year Synodic Cycle of Jupiter and Saturn:

The 20-year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn has been associated with notable historical events since the US civil war in the 1860s. Jupiter represents growth and expansion, while Saturn signifies structure and limitation. Their cycle reflects societal growth (Jupiter) within the bounds of societal structures (Saturn). Key events in these cycles have corresponded with periods of tension and release in societal structures8.

Conclusion:

Astrology provides an archetypal language that can offer valuable insights into human events and collective experiences. The movements of the outer planets, seen as the hands of a cosmic clock, could reflect the ebb and flow of societal transformations over time. As we approach critical astrological junctures, we can anticipate significant shifts in our collective trajectory.

Footnotes

  1. Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology
  2. An Introduction to Archetypal Astrological Analysis
  3. Planetary Gods: Accessing the Archetypes Through Astrology
  4. Holotropic Research and Archetypal Astrology
  5. Nation: USA No.1 2
  6. Contemporary Western Astrology: A Conceptual and Philosophical Critique 2022
  7. Planets in Play: How to Reimagine Your Life Through the Language of Astrology
  8. Jung’s Mythical Journey-Astrology, Archetypes, the Sun and the Self

The Cultural Significance of the 1960s and the Uranus-Pluto Conjunction

Introduction:

The 1960s was a decade marked by significant cultural and societal shifts, from the explosion of popular music to the Civil Rights Movement. This section explores the cultural significance of events in the 1960s and their correlation with the Uranus-Pluto conjunction, a significant astrological event that occurred during the same period.

Cultural Significance of Events in the 1960s:

The 1960s was a decade of vibrant colors, drug use, free love, and artistic expression1. Events such as the first televised presidential debate, the Bay of Pigs incident, and the Cuban missile crisis defined the political landscape2. The era also saw the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the Civil Rights Movement led by Martin Luther King Jr., and the escalation of the Vietnam War34.

Astrological Significance of the Uranus-Pluto Conjunction:

In astrology, the conjunction of Uranus (symbolic of individuality and revolution) and Pluto (representing transformation and regeneration) is considered a time of intense change and upheaval5. The synodic cycle of these two planets in the 1960s coincided with significant societal changes.

Correlation Between the Cultural Events and the Uranus-Pluto Conjunction:

Viewed through the lens of astrological symbolism, the conjunction of Uranus and Pluto can be seen as a reflection of the transformative and revolutionary energies of the 1960s. The Civil Rights Movement, for instance, embodied the revolutionary spirit of Uranus and the transformative power of Pluto. Similarly, the explosion of popular music and the counterculture movement could be seen as expressions of the disruptive Uranian energy and the transformative Plutonian force.

Conclusion:

While there is no empirical evidence to suggest a causal relationship between planetary movements and human events, the correlation between the cultural shifts of the 1960s and the Uranus-Pluto conjunction provides a compelling narrative. It underscores the value of astrology as a symbolic language that can offer unique insights into the collective human experience.

Footnotes

  1. “1960s America | History, Culture & Social Changes”, study.com
  2. “The Sixties . Timeline . Text Version”, pbs.org
  3. “Major Historical and Cultural Events of the 1960’s in America”, prezi.com
  4. “What Happened in the 1960s inc. News, Popular Culture …”, thepeoplehistory.com
  5. “Astrological Archetypes and the Cosmic Clock: An Examination Through Four Postulates”, Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology

The Astrological Archetypes and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: An Examination of Uranus and Pluto Movements

Introduction:

The Uranus-Pluto cycle in astrology has been associated with periods of significant societal change and upheaval. This section explores the potential correlation between the movements of these planets, particularly their aspects in 2015 and 2025, and the projected constitutional crisis in the United States for the November 5, 2024 presidential election, using the Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence1. In this birth chart, Sagittarius, symbolizing exploration and the quest for truth, might indicate the nation’s ongoing journey toward realizing its democratic ideals. The placement of Pluto in the second house of values and resources could suggest the potential for a deep transformation in these areas, as well as the corruption of power through vested interests.

Astrological Archetypes and Their Roles:

Uranus symbolizes revolution and individuality, while Pluto represents transformation and regeneration2. Their conjunction in the 1960s coincided with a period of intense cultural and societal upheaval3.

The Uranus-Pluto Cycle and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election:

The opening square between Uranus and Pluto in 2015 marked a period of tension and conflict, which could be interpreted as a precursor to the looming constitutional crisis4. As this aspect eases into a trine in 2025, it could suggest possible resolutions or transformations arising from this crisis. This resolutions may result in either the rise of fascism (imposed “peace”), or the renovation of the democratic ideal of true and lasting peace through goodwill and right human relations, in preparation for the externalization of the planetary spiritual Hierarchy and the physical reappearance of the World Teacher.

Astrology does not predict; it only indicates opportunities for transformative processes that may unfold right or wrong. Thus, the need to train humanity in the right use of its free will, as suggested in the principles of a hierarchical democracy.

JB

The Natal USA Chart and Its Implications:

In the Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, considered the birth chart of the United States, Uranus is in Gemini in the seventh house, indicating a revolutionary spirit in relationships with other nations5. On the other hand, Pluto in Capricorn in the second house suggests a positive or negative transformative force in terms of values and resources6.

The transits of Pluto and Uranus conjunct with their placements in the natal USA chart around the time of the 2024 election may intensify these themes. These transits could indicate a deep transformation (Pluto) in the nation’s values and resources and a revolution (Uranus) in its relationships with other nations, possibly reflecting the constitutional crisis.

Conclusion:

While there is no empirical evidence to suggest a causal relationship between planetary movements and human events, the correlation between the Uranus-Pluto cycle and the potential constitutional crisis around the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election provides a compelling narrative. It underscores the value of astrology as a symbolic language that can offer unique insights into collective human experiences.

Footnotes

  1. “Nation: USA No.1”, astro.com
  2. “Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology”
  3. “The Uranus-Pluto Conjunction of the 1960s and Its Effects on Culture”, astro.com
  4. “The Uranus-Pluto Square 2012-2015”, astro.com
  5. “The Declaration Chart”, mountainastrologer.com
  6. “Astrology and the United States: The Making of America”, astrologynewsreport.com

The Astrological Archetypes and Global Upheaval: An Examination of Outer Planets Changing Tropical Signs Around 2025

Introduction:

This section explores the correlation between the anticipated shift of most outer planets changing tropical signs around 2025, and the current social and political upheaval worldwide.

Astrological Archetypes and Their Roles:

Outer planets, such as Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, symbolize revolution, dreams, and transformation, respectively1. When these planets change tropical signs, it often corresponds with significant societal changes.

Impact of Outer Planets Changing Tropical Signs Around 2025:

The imminent shift of most outer planets into new tropical signs around 2025 could signal a period of substantial global transformation. These movements might correlate with the current social and political upheaval worldwide, suggesting an intensification or culmination of these issues by 202523.

Correlation with Current Social and Political Upheaval:

The world is currently experiencing significant social and political upheaval, from climate change to political polarization45. The impending shift of outer planets could reflect this turmoil, symbolizing a period of intense change and transformation. For example, Uranus’ entry into Gemini could indicate a revolution in communication, while Neptune’s move into Aries might suggest a collective dream of new beginnings6.

Conclusion:

While astrology does not provide empirical evidence for causality, the correlation between the movement of outer planets and global social and political upheaval offers a symbolic narrative. It underscores the potential of astrology to provide unique insights into collective human experiences, suggesting that the anticipated astrological shifts around 2025 might correlate with a climax in the current global upheaval.

Footnotes

  1. “Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology”
  2. “Astrophysical data: Planets and stars”, books.google.com
  3. “Neptune and Triton: Essential pieces of the Solar System puzzle”, sciencedirect.com
  4. “The impact of climate change on tropical diseases spread”, researchgate.net
  5. “Macroshift: Navigating the transformation to a sustainable world”, books.google.com
  6. “Planets in Signs”, astrostyle.com

The Pluto Shift from Capricorn to Aquarius: An Astrological Perspective on Global Change

Introduction:

The transition of Pluto from Capricorn to Aquarius, which occurred in January 2024, is a significant astrological event. Pluto, an outer planet representing transformation, death, and rebirth, changes signs approximately every 21 (from 12 to 31) years1. This section explores the implications of this shift and its potential correlation with global changes.

Pluto’s Transition from Capricorn to Aquarius:

Pluto’s transit through Capricorn, starting in 2008, was associated with a focus on structure, authority, and material success2. As Pluto moved into Aquarius in 2024, it signaled a shift towards matters related to innovation, community, and humanitarian values3.

Implications for Global Change:

Aquarius symbolizes innovation, freedom, and collective well-being4. Pluto’s entry into this sign may imply a period of profound transformation in these areas. Considering the current social and political upheaval worldwide, this shift could symbolize a collective move towards more progressive, humanitarian, and innovative solutions5.

Conclusion:

While astrology does not provide empirical evidence for causality, the correlation between the movement of Pluto from Capricorn to Aquarius and global changes offers a symbolic narrative. It underscores the potential of astrology to provide unique insights into collective human experiences, suggesting that the anticipated astrological shifts might correlate with a shift in global consciousness towards more innovative and humanitarian values.

Footnotes

  1. “Pluto In Astrology: The Planet of Power”, astrology-zodiac-signs.com
  2. “Pluto in Capricorn”, astrostyle.com
  3. “Pluto in Aquarius Is Bringing More Unprecedented Times”, thecut.com
  4. “Aquarius Zodiac Sign: Characteristics, Dates, & More”, astrology.com
  5. “Pluto in Aquarius Will Affect Every Zodiac Sign 2024-2044”, stylecaster.com

Astrological Cycles, Civil Unrest and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: A Correlative Study

Introduction:

Astrology has long been used to interpret societal shifts and changes. This last section of the essay explores the correlation between the 20-year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn since the U.S. civil war in the 1860s, Steve Bannon’s thesis of an imminent next civil war in the USA, and the looming constitutional crisis for the November 5, 2024 presidential election. The Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, considered the birth chart of the United States1, will be used as reference.

Jupiter and Saturn Synodic Cycle:

The Jupiter-Saturn cycle, occurring approximately every 20 years, is often associated with socio-political change2. Since the U.S. Civil War in the 1860s, this cycle has coincided with significant shifts in American society and politics3.

Steve Bannon’s Thesis of an Imminent Civil War:

Steve Bannon, a key figure in the Trump administration, has proposed the thesis of an imminent next civil war in the U.S., known as the “Fourth Turning.” He suggests that the country is on the verge of a crisis that could culminate in civil strife4.

Correlation with the Looming Constitutional Crisis:

The upcoming 2024 presidential election has been predicted to potentially trigger a constitutional crisis. Considering Bannon’s thesis and the current Jupiter-Saturn cycle, these astrological movements could symbolize the escalation of tensions leading up to this event5.

The Sagittarius-rising Chart and Its Implications:

In the Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, Jupiter is in Cancer in the eighth house, indicating a nation’s growth through transformation and shared resources6. Saturn, in Libra in the tenth house, suggests a country’s structure and authority is balanced through justice7. The Jupiter-Saturn cycle, in relation to their placements in the U.S. birth chart, could suggest a period of significant transformation and rebalancing in the nation’s socio-political landscape.

Conclusion:

While astrology does not provide empirical evidence for causality, the correlation between the Jupiter-Saturn cycle, Bannon’s thesis, and the potential constitutional crisis offers a compelling narrative. It underscores astrology’s potential to provide unique insights into collective experiences, suggesting that the upcoming astrological shifts might correlate with significant socio-political changes in the U.S.

Footnotes

  1. “Nation: USA No.1”, astro.com
  2. “The Jupiter-Saturn Cycle”, astro.com
  3. “Jupiter and Saturn and Pluto, Oh My! Social Planets and Cycles”, astrodienst.com
  4. “Devil’s Bargain: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, and the Nationalist Uprising”, books.google.com
  5. “The Civil War in the American ruling class”, triple-c.at
  6. “The Declaration Chart”, mountainastrologer.com
  7. “Astrology and the United States: The Making of America”, astrologynewsreport.com

The Uranus Neptune Pluto Triangle of 2024–2027

The mini triangle configuration is also called a transiting midpoint which is something that happens two or three times each century, so they’re quite rare. They usually have either Uranus or Pluto at the midpoint between the other two planets, while Neptune midpoints happen only once every 500 years. The last time Neptune was at the midpoint was in 1504!

https://jessicadavidson.co.uk/2023/11/13/the-uranus-neptune-pluto-triangle-2024-2027/


Breaking the MAGA Cult

Republicans who will gather to cast the first votes of the 2024 presidential primary season have one essential responsibility: to nominate a candidate who is fit to serve as president, one who will “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Donald Trump, who has proved himself unwilling to do so, is manifestly unworthy.

This is not a partisan concern. It is good for the country when both major parties have qualified presidential candidates to put forward their competing views on the role of government in American society. Voters deserve such a choice in 2024.

Mr. Trump’s construction of a cult of personality in which loyalty is the only real requirement has badly damaged the Republican Party and the health of American democracy.

Mr. Trump’s record of contempt for the Constitution — and his willingness to corrupt people, systems and processes to his advantage — puts all of it at risk.

NYT Editorial
The Post’s model does this by using precinct-level results from both years, as well as demographic data, to determine the likely share of voters a 2024 candidate picked up..

I asked my AI personal assistant, how do you break a spell?

Breaking a spell can be a complex process, depending on the nature of the spell and the belief system in which it was cast. However, here is a general guideline that is often recommended in various traditions:

  1. Identify the Spell: Firstly, you need to identify the type of spell that has been cast. This can be tricky, but if you’ve been subjected to a spell, there might be signs such as recurring bad luck, unexplained illnesses, or a series of unfortunate events.
  2. Cleanse Yourself and Your Environment: This usually involves some sort of ritual cleansing. This could be a bath with specific herbs or salts known for their cleansing properties, burning sage (also known as smudging), or using sound like bells or singing bowls to dispel negative energy.
  3. Protection: You can protect yourself by visualizing a protective shield around you, wearing or carrying protective symbols, or invoking protection from a higher power you believe in.
  4. Reverse or Neutralize the Spell: Depending on your beliefs, this could involve casting a counter-spell, using a charm or talisman, or praying for the spell to be lifted.
  5. Seek Professional Help: If you’re not comfortable dealing with this on your own, you may want to seek the help of a professional spell breaker or spiritual advisor.

Remember, these guidelines are based on various traditions and belief systems. The effectiveness of these steps can vary greatly depending on personal beliefs and the specifics of the situation.

Jasper.ai

But I’m not a superstitious person.
How can I scientifically break a spell?

From a scientific perspective, the concept of a “spell” or “hex” is not supported, as they are typically associated with supernatural or paranormal beliefs. However, the feeling of being under a spell might be more related to psychological factors, such as the power of suggestion or the placebo/nocebo effect.

The placebo/nocebo effect is a fascinating aspect of human psychology where our expectations and beliefs can influence our physical health. For example, if someone believes they’ve been cursed or hexed, their belief can manifest in physical symptoms. Conversely, believing that a spell has been broken can alleviate those symptoms.

In this case, one way to “break a spell” scientifically could be to use cognitive-behavioral techniques to change your beliefs and perceptions about the spell. This could involve challenging irrational thoughts, using relaxation techniques to manage anxiety, or seeking help from a mental health professional.

Another approach is understanding that energy is just energy; it’s neither divine nor evil. As Sadhguru mentions, it’s up to us how we interpret and react to it. This perspective can help you navigate your feelings and reactions to the idea of being under a spell.

Remember, if you’re experiencing distressing symptoms, it’s always a good idea to seek advice from a healthcare provider.

Sources:

  1. Quora
  2. New Scientist
  3. Isha Foundation
Jasper.ai

How would Dean Radin, according to the ideas laid out in his book “Real Magic,” approach the subject of breaking a spell from a noetic perspective?

Dean Radin, a renowned scientist and author known for his work on psi phenomena, approaches the subject of magic from a perspective that blends ancient wisdom with modern science. His book “Real Magic: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science, and a Guide to the Secret Power of the Universe” explores the idea that magic is a natural aspect of reality and something each of us can potentially tap into.

In terms of breaking a spell, though Radin doesn’t provide specific instructions in his book, he might suggest a noetic or consciousness-based approach, given his research focus at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. This could involve using the power of intention and consciousness to counteract the effects of the spell.

Radin’s work often emphasizes the role of belief and expectation in shaping our experiences. He might argue that if you believe a spell has power over you, it can have real effects due to the influence of these beliefs on your consciousness. Conversely, changing your beliefs could be a way to break the spell.

Radin also highlights the potential of meditation and other mind-body practices for cultivating our innate capacities. It’s possible that such practices could be used to help break a spell by shifting your mental state and altering your perceptions.

However, it’s important to note that Radin’s work remains controversial within mainstream science, and his interpretations are not universally accepted. Always seek professional advice if you’re dealing with serious emotional or psychological distress.

Sources:

  1. Real Magic – Dean Radin
  2. Excerpt from Real Magic
  3. Interview with Dr Dean Radin
  4. How To Harness The Power Of “Magic” with Dean Radin PhD
Jasper.ai

The MAGA cult is a spell cast on the United States. The main article of faith of this cult is the belief that Donald J. Trump is the Messiah chosen by God to “make America great again.” Rural America, white Evangelicals and younger people are prone to this spell.

Modern esotericism refers to spells as glamours. The Technique of Light is the recommended way to prevent, negate and destroy the appearance, quality and life of the MAGA cult from affecting the United States and humanity. So may it be prevented, negated and destroyed. -JB



I have a dream

UMich Symphony Band – Joseph Schwantner – New Morning for the World: “Daybreak of Freedom” (1982)

https://runyanprogramnotes.com/joseph-schwantner/new-morning-world-daybreak-freedom


Today, January 15, 2024, the United States celebrates a federal holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s 95th birthday. This day holds great significance for American democracy and also serves as the formal beginning of the 2024 US presidential election year, with the first GOP Republican Caucus taking place in Iowa. The outcome of this election year will play a vital role in determining the future of the American experiment in self-government. The country has not faced a constitutional crisis of this magnitude since the Civil War.

As we celebrate the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., it is important to reflect on the values he stood for and fought for throughout his lifetime. A key aspect of his vision was the idea of a government that truly represented and served its people – a government of, by, and for the people.

In 2024, we find ourselves at a critical juncture in American history. The upcoming presidential election will determine whether we continue down the path towards true democracy, or if we risk losing our hard-won rights and freedoms to a monarchy-like rule.

At stake is not just the future leadership of our country, but also the very essence of our democracy. We must ask ourselves: are we willing to let one authoritarian leader — unfit to govern in a democracy —have unchecked power, or do we believe in the power of the people to collectively make decisions for the greater good?

So, let’s make use of the Great Invocation “with massed intent” as we commemorate this Holy Day dedicated to the memory of a racial avatar, the last MLK commemoration before the momentous year of 2025.


New Morning for the World “Daybreak of Freedom”

“There comes a time when people get tired – tired of being segregated and humiliated,
tired of being kicked about by the brutal feet of oppression.”1

“We are going to walk non-violently and peacefully to let the nation and the world know
that we are tired now. We’ve lived with slavery and segregation three hundred and
forty-five years. We waited a long time for freedom.”2

“Before the pilgrims landed at Plymouth, we were here. Before the pen of Jefferson
etched across the pages of history the majestic words of the Declaration of Independence, we were here. For more than two centuries, our fore parents labored in this
country without wages – and built the homes of their masters in the midst of brutal
injustice and shameful humiliation. And yet out of a bottomless vitality, they continued
to thrive and develop. If the inexpressible cruelties of slavery could not stop us, the
opposition we now face will surely fail. We will win our freedom because the sacred
heritage of our nation and the eternal will of God are embodied in our echoing
demands.”3

“Now is the time to make real the promise of democracy. Now is the time to rise from
the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now
is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock
of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality to all of God’s children. We
cannot walk alone. As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march
ahead. We cannot turn back. No, no, we are not satisfied and we will not be satisfied
until justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.”4

“We’re on the move now – neither the burning of our churches nor the beating and
killing of our clergymen will stop us. We’re on the move now – my people listen! The
battle is in our hands – I know some of you are asking, “How long will it take?” I
come to say to you however difficult the moment, however frustrating the hour, it will
not be long because truth pressed to the earth will rise again. How long? Not long
because no lie can live forever. How long? Not long because you will reap what you
sow. How long? Not long because the arm of the moral universe is long but it bends
toward justice.”5

“When the history books are written in future generations, the historians will have
pause and say, “There lived a great people – a black people – who injected new
meaning and dignity into the veins of civilization.” This is our challenge and our
responsibility.” “6


“I have a dream.”7


“The dream is one of equality of opportunity, of privilege and property widely
distributed; a dream of a land where men will not take necessities from the many to
give luxuries to the few; a dream of a land where men do not argue that the color of
a man’s skin determines the content of his character; a dream of a place where all our
gifts and resources are held not for ourselves alone but as instruments of service for
the rest of humanity; the dream of a country where every man will respect the dignity
and worth of all human personality, and men will dare to live together as brothers.
Whenever it is fulfilled, we will emerge from the bleak and desolate midnight of
man’s inhumanity to man into the bright and glowing daybreak of freedom and
justice for all of God’s children.”8

  1. From STRIDE TOWARD FREEDOM by Martin Luther King, Jr. Copyright 1958 by
    Martin Luther King, Jr.
  2. From BEHIND THE SELMA MARCH by Martin Luther King, Jr. Copyright 1965 by
    Martin Luther King, Jr.
  3. From LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL by Martin Luther King, Jr. Copyright 1963,
    1964 by Martin Luther King, Jr.
  4. From I HAVE A DREAM by Martin Luther King, Jr. @ Copyright 1963 by Martin Luther
    King, Jr.
  5. From BEHIND THE SELMA MARCH by Martin Luther King, Jr. Copyright 1965 by
    Martin Luther King, Jr.
  6. From STRIDE TOWARD FREEDOM by Martin Luther King, Jr. Copyright 1958 by
    Martin Luther King, Jr.
  7. From I HAVE A DREAM by Martin Luther King, Jr. Copyright 1963 by Martin Luther
    King, Jr.
  8. @ Copyright 1958, 1963 by Martin Luther King, Jr.
    All the above used by permission of JOAN DAVES
https://www.esm.rochester.edu/uploads/EWE_9-21-22_consecutive.pdf

The Great Invocation (1940)

Let the Lords of Liberation issue forth.
Let them bring succour to the sons of men.
Let the Rider from the Secret Place come forth,
And coming, save. Come forth, O Mighty One.

Let the souls of men awaken to the light.
And may they stand with massed intent.
Let the fiat of the Lord go forth:

The end of woe has come!

Come forth, O Mighty One.
The hour of service of the saving force has now arrived.
Let it be spread abroad, O Mighty One.

Let Light and Love and Power and Death
Fulfill the purpose of the Coming One.

The WILL to save is here.
The LOVE to carry forth the work is widely spread abroad.
The ACTIVE AID of all who know the truth is also here.

Come forth, O Mighty One, and blend these three.
Construct a great defending wall.
The rule of evil NOW must end.


Beethoven Symphony No 3 in E♭ „Eroica“ Leonard Bernstein Wiener Philharmoniker



A glimmer of hope


About 1,200 people were killed during the Hamas-led Oct. 7 assault against Israel, a majority of them civilians, according to the Israeli authorities. Israel’s retaliatory war against Hamas in Gaza has killed more than 23,000 Palestinians, a majority of them women and children, according to Gaza health officials.

Warning of a long conflict, the Israeli statements exposed a growing dissonance between the domestic perception of the timing and goals of the war and increasing international impatience in the face of a deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/14/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-war-gaza.html

On the 100th day of a disproportionate vengeful retribution against Palestinian civilians, with inhuman acts of criminal collective punishment conducted with impunity by the Israeli military, the world observes with dismay the complicity with which the United States continues to support crimes of war with taxpayers’ funded offensive weaponry killing Palestinian civilians. This is well beyond the more justifiable support for the defensive Iron Dome.

Of course, using civilians as human shields and taking civilian hostages are also war crimes to be universally condemned without any justification whatsoever, even in an asymmetric warfare. However, the disproportionate death toll of civilians is only comparable to the imbalance of power to negotiate a just and lasting peace between the warring parties. The genocidal rhetoric of Netanyahu and his extreme right coalition adds fuel to the raging fire.

This imbalance of power is the main reason why all previous peace accords between Israel and Palestine have not stood the test of time. This is made clear by Fareed Zakaria’s historical overview in his GPS Special: The Road to War in the Middle East aired on December 24, 2023. 

In the last segment, despite Fareed’s biased question,

Do you think that fundamentally the problem is that the Palestinians, at some point, have not been educated by their leadership to recognize that, look, they’ve lost this long struggle, that they’re not going to get the whole loaf, they’re going to get 22 percent of that loaf? And you have to kind of admit that. And the unwillingness to admit that is — and, you know, the worry that if you admit that you will be assassinated or you’ll get outflanked by Hamas, that that’s been at the core of it, that there isn’t somebody who’s willing to speak honestly to the Palestinians and say, look, this is all we can get?

Fareed Zakaria

the former U.S. Ambassador Edward Djerejian aptly deflects such offensive and patronizing tone, replying instead with wise advice about the course of American diplomacy in this conflict.

At the end of the day there’s 7.2 million Palestinians and 7.2 approximately Israeli Jews in between the Jordan River and the Eastern Mediterranean. Neither one is going to go anywhere. They’re there. They have to divide the land.

Economic peace simply doesn’t work. But that was the trope, and that trope started in the Trump administration and the Biden administration obviously continued that with the normalization. I have nothing against normalization of Arab countries with Israel, but it was done at the cost of neglecting this central issue, the territorial aspects of peace between Israel and Palestine.

First, American diplomacy needs a deep understanding and appreciation of the basic facts on the ground in the Middle East and where the parties are coming from.

Second, we have to have a spine in our diplomacy. We have to be tough on both sides, or else nothing will happen. You know, we started off in 67 Israeli settlements. In U.S. government proclamations, Israeli settlements are illegal under international law, the Geneva Conventions of ’49.

You’ve seen over the years how the verbiage is that, oh, they’re an obstacle to peace, or they’re a problem. No, they’re illegal. The United States [must stand] tall on principle, and we have to do that with both sides: tough on the Arabs; tough on the Israelis. You have to be skillful in your diplomacy also.

The glimmer of hope is that I really do feel that October 7th is so consequential, akin to Yom Kippur in ’73. That the political landscape has changed. I hope one of the major lessons that everyone learns is that you cannot shunt the Palestinian issue aside and make it a secondary or tertiary issue, that you can make economic peace or peace for peace. We have to focus on land for peace.

And let’s make the hard decision to go for it. There’s a lot of diplomatic history in the archives on settlements, on territorial compromises, on Jerusalem, on refugees. There’s a body of negotiations that can be built on. Let’s get the leadership to get it done.

Former U.S. Ambassador Edward Djerejian has been working on diplomacy in the Middle East for more than 50 years. He’s been U.S. Ambassador to Israel, U.S. Ambassador to Syria and the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs.

May his words and experience light the way for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East. On this 100th day of the War on Gaza, it is made clear that the military option is not a viable alternative for a peace accord among equals. -JB


A Fareed Zakaria GPS Special: The Road to War in the Middle East

Why has the Israeli–Palestinian conflict been so intractable for so long? Fareed talks with Palestinian scholar Ahmad Khalidi, Israeli historian Benny Morris, former US diplomat Edward Djerejian and more about the attempts, missed chances, and future prospects of establishing a lasting peace in the region. 

https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/fzgps/date/2023-12-24/segment/01



The Shamballa Force

REALPOLITIK: it’s all about POWER

Realpolitik is a system of politics or principles based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations. The term, which originates from Germany (meaning “the politics of reality”), is often associated with power politics. The approach is characterized by pragmatic and practical considerations, such as the survival of the nation, national security interests, and the balance of power, rather than by ideological or ethical premises.

In Realpolitik, decisions are made based on the factual realities at hand, rather than an adherence to any specific philosophical or ethical ideal. This could mean forming alliances with otherwise unfriendly nations or compromising on values if it leads to increased power or security. The philosophy behind Realpolitik has been practiced throughout history, though the term itself did not come into common usage until the mid-19th century in Europe.

The term “Realpolitik” itself is still widely used today and continues to refer to a system of politics or principles based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations. However, it’s important to note that while the term may remain the same, its interpretation and application can evolve over time and vary between different regions, political systems, and individuals. For example, the concept of Realpolitik has been associated with various political figures throughout history, from its originator Ludwig von Rochau to more contemporary figures like Henry Kissinger. Their approaches, while all falling under the umbrella of Realpolitik, may have differed based on the specific historical and political contexts in which they were operating.

Phrases like “power politics,” “pragmatic diplomacy,” or “political realism,” convey similar ideas and are often used in discussions of foreign policy and international relations. These terms, while not new, reflect the core principles of Realpolitik.

… the THUGS we have inside our Country … are looking to destroy our once great USA. MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4376797-trump-may-they-rot-in-hell-merry-christmas/

The truly evil men

Confound not evil with the activities of the gangster or the criminal. Criminals and gangsters are the result of the emerging massed imperfections: they are the victims of ignorance, mishandling when children and misunderstanding down the ages of right human relations; the Law of Rebirth will eventually lead them on the way to good.

Those men are truly evil who seek to enforce a return to the bad old ways, who endeavor to keep their fellowmen in slavery of some kind or another, who block the expression of one or all of the Four Freedoms, who gain material riches at the expense of the exploited, or who seek to hold for themselves and for gain the produce of the earth, and thus make the cost of life’s necessities prohibitive to those not richly endowed. Those who thus work, think and plan are to be found in every nation, and are usually of prominence because of their riches and influence; however, they sin against light and not through ignorance; their goals are material and not spiritual. They are relatively few compared to the countless millions of men, but are exceedingly powerful; they are highly intelligent but unscrupulous, and it is through them that the Forces of Evil work, holding back progress, promoting poverty, breeding hatred and class distinctions, fostering racial differences for their own ends, and keeping ignorance in power. Their sin is great and it is hard for them to change, because power and the will-to-power (as it militates against the will-to-good) is a dominant all-controlling factor in their lives; these men are today working against the unity of the United Nations, [Page 669] through their greed, their determination to own the resources of the earth (such as oil, mineral wealth and food) and thus keep the people weak and with inadequate food. These men, who are found in every nation, thoroughly understand each other and are working together in great combines to exploit the riches of the earth at the expense of humanity.

The whole problem of evil is, however, too vast to contemplate here, nor is it advisable or wise to discuss the source of evil (not of imperfection), the Black Lodge. Energy follows thought, and the spoken word can be potently evocative: therefore, until one is a member of the Great White Lodge, it is the part of wisdom to avoid consideration of forces potent enough intelligently to use the latent imperfection in humanity and to impose the vast evil of war, with all its results and far-reaching effects, upon humanity. The Black Lodge is the problem of the White Lodge, and not the problem of humanity. For aeons the Hierarchy has handled this problem, and is now in process of solving it. It is essentially, however, the main consideration and problem of Shamballa, for it is connected with the will aspect, and only the will-to-good will suffice to blot out and annihilate the will-to-evil. Goodwill will not suffice, though the united and invocative appeal of the [Page 670] men of goodwill throughout the world-increasingly voiced through the Great Invocation-will serve “to seal the door where evil dwells.”

The Tibetan Master D.K.

Aligned with the principles of the New Group of World Servers, on the presidential ballot for the 2024 elections in the United States:

  • If you are a true conservative pledging allegiance to the Constitution of the United States:
    • vote Democrat, or
    • abstain from voting.
  • If you are a registered Democrat: do NOT stay at home. Vote Democrat on the presidential ballot regardless of the candidate and his/her flaws.
  • If you are an independent voter: vote Democrat.

This is NOT a partisan presidential election. The survival of democracy in the United States is at stake. Men and women of goodwill must support the Four Freedoms, here and now!

1944 pin from the re-election campaign of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

There is a door into an evil realm and into blackness, just as there is a door into a world of goodness and light.

The Tibetan Master D.K.

The progress made by humanity in the past two hundred years has lead to attention from the Council Chamber at Shamballa. The will aspect of divinity has made direct contact with the human mind. Thus, the latent goodwill in humanity has been evoked by the will-to-good from Shamballa. However, the will-to-power has also been evoked in selfish minds.

The origin of evil or the Black Lodge is a vast problem handled by the Hierarchy. Only the will-to-good can counter the will-to-evil, and the united appeal of men of goodwill, expressed through the Great Invocation, serves to seal the door where evil dwells.

It is behind that door and in dealing with the forces there concealed (and mobilized) that the Hierarchy is effective; the methods and modes whereby They protect humanity from mobilized evil, and are gradually driving the evil back, would not be understood by you who have not yet passed through the door which leads to the Way of the Higher Evolution.

The Tibetan Master D.K.

Freewill, Goodwill, Will-to-Good and Will-to-Power

The lines of cleavage have grown steadily until now they can be expressed in terms of a humanity which is oriented towards the higher spiritual and altruistic values and whose keynotes are sacrifice, group good and world understanding, and those whose focus is predominantly material and whose aims are selfish, animated by ambition and the spirit of acquisition.

It was the acuteness of this situation, and the wide extent of the cleavage, which induced the watching Hierarchy to permit a direct inflow of the Shamballa force (in spite of its attendant risks) to pour into the world. The objective was to stimulate the free will of the masses; the result upon them has been relatively good as it has led to the formulation and expression of the great world ideologies—Fascism, [Page 127] Democracy and Communism as well as that peculiarly distorted blend of Fascism and Communism which goes by the name of Hitlerism or Nazism. All these ideologies are fostered by the desire of the masses for the betterment of the condition in which the populace in any country lives and it has become focused, expressive and creative by the force of the Shamballa influence. But another result of this inflow of the will-to-power (power upon the physical plane and through the medium of form activity) has been to stimulate a certain group of outstanding personalities in many lands so that they have assumed control of the masses and can thus determine the policies and methods—religious, political and social—of the different nations. In every nation a relatively small group of people decide all important issues and determine all major national activities. This they do either by force, terror and deception or by persuasion, fair words and the application of ideological motives. Of this situation in the world the Lords of Destiny are availing themselves in order to bring the ancient conflict to an end and so enable humanity to pass into the new Aquarian Age relatively free and with a clearer understanding of right human aims, right relationships and man’s predestined future.

So great has been the progress of man during the past two hundred years that the Council Chamber at Shamballa was forced to take notice. As a result of this attention by the Great Lives around Sanat Kumara and Their interest in the affairs of men, two things happened:

  1. The will aspect of divinity made its first definite and direct contact with the human mind. The impact was direct and not deflected-as had hitherto been the case-to the Hierarchy and from thence to humanity.
  2. At the same time, the will-to-good from Shamballa evoked the latent goodwill in man, so that today and increasingly over the past one hundred years, goodness of heart, kindness in action, consideration for others and mass action to promote human welfare have spread over the Earth.
The Tibetan Master D.K.

Quotes from the Tibetan Master D.K. penned by Alice A. Bailey in the books published by the Lucis Trust.



From Anarchy to Hierarchy

Ray 1. Will Power. Transmitted through Aries, Leo and Capricorn.

As 2023 comes to an end, I’m struggling to make sense of the current world disorder, focusing on three major threats to our survival: Zionism in the Middle East, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the MAGA movement in the United States. They have one common theme: might makes right. They represent causes out of which other evils, such as (Hamas) terrorism, arise. Which makes me wonder, what is power? How can light, love and power restore God’s Plan on Earth?

In the context of the Capricorn full moon period overlapping Sol Invictus observance this Christmas season, let’s review current thought forms created by humanity on this subject, and how can they can be repurposed for a future of right human relations, goodwill and peace on Earth.

-JB

Two key theories of international relations

Structural realism, also known as neorealism, and human nature realism, often referred to as classical realism, are two key theories within the field of international relations. They share a common premise that states exist in an anarchic international system and that they act primarily out of self-interest. However, they differ significantly in their explanations for why this is the case.

Structural Realism (Neorealism): Structural realism, as articulated by theorists like Kenneth Waltz, posits that the behavior of states is determined by the anarchic structure of the international system1. In this system, there’s no overarching authority above the state, making security a primary concern. States, according to structural realists, are rational actors that seek to survive by maintaining and increasing their power relative to other states. The focus here is on the system, not on the individual state or its leaders2.

Human Nature Realism (Classical Realism): Human nature realism, on the other hand, asserts that the behavior of states is driven primarily by human nature. Classical realists like Hans Morgenthau argue that it’s the inherent flaws in human nature, such as the lust for power, that lead to conflict and competition among states3. This perspective focuses more on the role of leadership, national character, and moral and ethical considerations in shaping a state’s foreign policy4.

In summary, while structural realism emphasizes the anarchic structure of the international system as the determinant of state behavior, human nature realism places more emphasis on the characteristics and behaviors of individuals and groups within the state.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  2. International Relations.org
  3. Britannica
  4. International Relations.org

Offensive and defensive realism are two key sub-theories within the school of structural realism in international relations. Both theories agree on the anarchic nature of the international system, but they differ significantly in their views on state behavior and security.

Offensive Realism: Proposed by John Mearsheimer, offensive realism postulates that states are power-maximizers1. In an anarchic international system with no overarching authority, states must always be concerned about their security. To ensure survival, they strive to achieve hegemony, as the best guarantee against attack is to be the most powerful state in the system. Offensive realists believe that states should constantly look for opportunities to gain power at the expense of others2.

Defensive Realism: Defensive realism, associated with theorists like Kenneth Waltz and Robert Jervis, suggests that states are security-maximizers3. While acknowledging the anarchic nature of the international system, defensive realists argue that an aggressive foreign policy often proves counterproductive, provoking other states to form balancing coalitions. Therefore, states should maintain a moderate level of power and pursue cooperative security arrangements to mitigate potential threats4.

In summary, while offensive realists see aggression as a necessity for states to secure their survival, defensive realists advocate for a more moderate and cooperative approach to ensure security in the international system.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. John Mearsheimer’s “The Tragedy of Great Power Politics”
  2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  3. Kenneth Waltz’s “Theory of International Politics”
  4. Oxford Research Encyclopedias

Entropy, Anarchy and the Omega Point

Entropy in physics is a fundamental concept that describes the degree of disorder or randomness in a system. In the context of structural realism in international relations, it can be interpreted as the inherent unpredictability and complexity in the international system due to the absence of a central authority1.

Structural realism asserts that the international system is anarchic, and states are primarily driven by their self-interests for survival and power. This could be seen as a state of high entropy where there’s a high degree of uncertainty and disorder. Structural realists argue that this anarchic structure forces states to act in certain predictable ways, such as balancing against threats, which could be seen as attempts to manage or reduce this entropy2.

On the other hand, Teilhard de Chardin’s concept of the Omega Point presents a contrasting view. The Omega Point theory posits that consciousness and evolution are moving towards a maximum point of complexity and consciousness, known as the Omega Point3. This suggests a progression from high entropy (anarchy) to low entropy (hierarchy), driven by the evolution of consciousness.

In contrast to structural realism which views the international system as inherently conflictual and competitive due to its anarchic nature, the Omega Point theory suggests a more optimistic view of the potential for cooperation and integration as consciousness evolves.

In essence, while entropy and structural realism might highlight the disorder and power struggles in the international system, the Omega Point theory offers a perspective on how evolving consciousness could lead to greater order and unity.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Entropy, technology, and warfare — understanding world politics through physics
  2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  3. Teilhard de Chardin’s The Phenomenon of Man

Liberalism in International Relations

Liberalism is a key theory in international relations that offers an optimistic worldview. It posits that international institutions and interactions can overcome the anarchic nature of the international system, leading to a more cooperative and peaceful world order1.

  1. Democratic Peace Theory: This theory suggests that democracies are less likely to go to war with each other due to shared values, internal constraints, and the transparency of their political systems2. Democratic norms require leaders to resolve disputes through negotiation and compromise, reducing the likelihood of conflict.
  2. Economic Interdependence: According to liberals, economic interdependence reduces the likelihood of war by increasing the costs of conflict and the benefits of peace3. High levels of trade and investment create mutual benefits and dependencies that both sides would not want to jeopardize through military conflict.
  3. Institutionalism: Liberals argue that international institutions, such as the United Nations, play a crucial role in promoting peace and cooperation4. Institutions provide forums for dialogue, help enforce international laws, reduce uncertainty about others’ intentions, and make it more difficult for states to renege on their commitments.

While liberalism recognizes that conflicts and power struggles exist among nations, it emphasizes the potential for cooperation, largely driven by democratic governance, economic ties, and institutional mechanisms.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  2. Oxford Research Encyclopedias
  3. Journal of Peace Research
  4. International Studies Quarterly

Natural Organic Hierarchies

Systems theory posits that systems, whether they are biological ecosystems, social structures, or organizations, are made up of interconnected parts that form a complex whole. This holistic approach emphasizes the interdependence of all system components and their interactions1.

Natural organic hierarchies, as suggested by systems theory, are intrinsic to the organization of many systems in nature. They are characterized by a structure where elements at each level of the hierarchy interact more strongly with each other than with those at different levels2. This hierarchical organization is seen as an inherent property of nature2.

In ecology, for example, the hierarchical structure can be observed in the organization of ecosystems, from individual organisms (lowest level) to populations, communities, ecosystems, and the biosphere (highest level)3. This hierarchy facilitates understanding and analysis of ecological phenomena.

Similarly, in the context of organizations, there are rational, natural, and open systems. Natural systems focus on the human component in organizations, acknowledging that people and their interactions play a crucial role in shaping an organization’s structure and processes4.

The concept of organic hierarchies also extends to areas like organic farming, where systems thinking is reflected in stewardship towards nature, the ethics of animal husbandry, and recycling principles5.

In essence, systems theory’s concept of natural organic hierarchies highlights the interconnectedness and interdependence of elements within a system, facilitating our understanding of complex natural and social phenomena.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Concepts of Systems Thinking
  2. Hierarchical structure of biological systems – PMC 2
  3. The Hierarchical Structure of Ecosystems: Connections to Evolution
  4. Rational, Natural, and Open Systems of Organizations
  5. Systems Theory as a Scientific Approach towards Organic Farming

Symbols

The symbol of anarchy, also known as the Circle-A, is composed of an “A” and an “O”. The “A” stands for “anarchy”, which means “without rulers”. The “O” represents “order”. Together, they convey the phrase “Anarchy is the mother of Order“, which is a part of a quote attributed to Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, a French philosopher and one of the first self-proclaimed anarchists12.

This symbol is said to represent a French anarchist’s maxim “Anarchy is Order“. It implies that society seeks order, but without the imposition of authority or rulers3.

It’s important to note that anarchism doesn’t signify chaos in all its aspects. Rather, it advocates for a society based on voluntary cooperation of individuals4.

While the anarchy symbol has been associated with various movements and ideas over time, it fundamentally remains a representation of a society seeking order through non-hierarchical and voluntary associations5.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Rival LA
  2. Quora
  3. Public Intelligence
  4. Reddit Anarchy 101
  5. Symbols

There isn’t a universally recognized symbol for hierarchy that contrasts directly with the anarchy symbol. In contrast, hierarchy often manifests in symbols of structures or pyramids, representing rigid levels of authority or power, often imposed.

I propose that Roerich’s Banner of Peace be adopted as a universal symbol of hierarchy. The streams of Light and Love converging into the One (Power) on the Path of Return, restoring the Plan on Earth.

JB

Hierarchy is not coercion, it is the law of the Universe. It is not a threat, but the call of the heart and a fiery admonition directing toward the General Good.

Thus let us cognize the Hierarchy of Light.

https://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Hierarchy.php

The Three Fundamentals

The First Cause may be construed to comprise three fundamentals: Omnipotent Good, Omniscient Beautiful, and Omnipresent Creative Sound of Light.

These three fundamentals manifest in varying degrees in different philosophies and religions. For example, in Hinduism, the Trimurti consists of three deities: Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, representing creation, preservation, and destruction, respectively. In Christianity, the Holy Trinity comprises the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Three great energies are focused in Shamballa, the seat of fire:

  • The Energy of Purification: This is the power, innate in the manifested universe, which gradually and steadily adapts the substance aspect to the spiritual. It involves the elimination of all that hinders the nature of divinity from full expression.
  • The Energy of Destruction: This is a destruction which removes or changes the forms which imprison the inner spiritual life, and hide the inner soul light.
  • The Energy of Organization: This is the energy which started the impulse which produced manifestation. The relation of spirit and matter cyclically and under law creates the manifested world as a field for soul development and as an area wherein divine purpose is wrought out through the medium of the Plan.

The Shamballa force therefore focusses the will-to-good, leading to right human relationship, and establishing peace on Earth.

The Shamballa Force • Lucis Trust

Let LIGHT and LOVE and POWER restore the Plan on Earth.



Cruelty in Gaza

Why Fear AI When Human Cruelty Knows No Bounds?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a subject of fear and concern, particularly its potential misuse leading to catastrophic events such as the extinction of humanity. However, when we examine the horrors of the current war in Gaza, we must ask ourselves: should we be more afraid of AI or of the inherent cruelty of twisted human minds?

Israel military says 2 civilians killed for every Hamas militant is a ‘tremendously positive’ ratio given combat challenges.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/05/middleeast/israel-hamas-military-civilian-ratio-killed-intl-hnk/index.html

The UNESCO Constitution states, “Since wars begin in the minds of men and women, it is in the minds of men and women that the defenses of peace must be constructed” [1]. This profound statement underscores the fact that the root of conflict lies not in technology, but in human attitudes and behaviors.

The ongoing war in Gaza, marked by shocking atrocities, serves as a grim testament to this reality. The initial terrorist attack on October 7, followed by the subsequent disproportionate response by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), has resulted in a devastating cycle of violence and human suffering [2]. Yet, it is not AI that initiated this conflict, but rather, decisions and actions resulting from the misuse of the human will.

History bears witness to numerous genocidal wars where AI was not involved. The Rwandan Genocide of 1994, the Bosnian War from 1992 to 1995, and more recently, the Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar are stark reminders of the scale of atrocities that can be perpetrated solely by human hands [3][4][5].

In this light, the fear of AI — the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to reason and act like humans — might be somewhat misplaced. AI is a tool, as beneficial or destructive as the intentions of those who wield it. The true danger lies in AI’s potential to amplify malevolent intentions. Ultimately, it is the misuse of human will that lies at the core of the issue.

This leads us to an important question: how can human will — individual and national — be aligned with the common good without infringing upon free will, and the right for self-defense? This is a critical test for democracy. Democracies thrive on the principle of individual freedom, yet they also necessitate a collective agreement on what constitutes the responsible use of such freedom by promoting right human relations leading to lasting peace.

From the center where the Will of God is known
Let purpose guide the little wills of men –
The purpose which the Masters know and serve.

From the center which we call the race of men
Let the Plan of Love and Light work out
And may it seal the door where evil dwells.

https://www.lucistrust.org/the_great_invocation

Therefore, while it is prudent to be cautious about the potential misuse of AI, it is even more important to recognize that the root of most atrocities lies in human cruelty, not in technology. Instead of fearing AI, perhaps our efforts would be better directed towards fostering empathy, understanding, and peace within the minds of men and women.

[1] “UNESCO Constitution.” UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/about-us/introducing-unesco [2] “Gaza conflict: What happened in the most recent clash?” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-57053074 [3] “Rwanda: How the genocide happened.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13431486 [4] “Bosnian Genocide.” History. https://www.history.com/topics/1990s/bosnian-genocide [5] “Myanmar Rohingya: What you need to know about the crisis.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41566561


On cruelty

Cruelty can be defined as the deliberate infliction of physical or psychological pain, suffering, or harm upon others. It involves acts that are intentionally malicious, inhumane, or lacking compassion. While there may be varying degrees and manifestations of cruelty, it is generally considered a deeply debasing and morally reprehensible act.

More than 18,700 Palestinians have been killed, with 70% of them women and children, according to the territory’s health officials. The vast majority of its 2.2 million people are displaced, and an estimated half face starvation amid an unfolding humanitarian crisis.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live-blog/israel-hamas-war-live-updates-rcna130070

Human cruelty encompasses a wide range of actions, from individual acts of violence to systemic oppression and large-scale atrocities. Examples include physical abuse, torture, discrimination based on race or ethnicity, genocide, war crimes, and other forms of violence or mistreatment inflicted upon fellow human beings.

A supervisor with the Israeli search and recovery team in charge of collecting the bodies showed CBS News some of the injuries he saw and documented, including women whose bodies had lacerations, stabbings and gunshots to their genital area.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hamas-israel-witnesses-evidence-show-sexual-violence-oct-7-terror-attack/

The debasing nature of human cruelty stems from its disregard for the inherent dignity and worth of individuals, as well as the violation of fundamental ethical principles such as empathy, compassion, and respect for others. It represents a betrayal of our collective humanity and undermines the potential for harmonious coexistence and progress in society.

While human cruelty is undoubtedly a deeply troubling aspect of our existence, it is important to remember that there are also countless acts of kindness, compassion, and empathy that demonstrate the best of humanity. By striving to cultivate these positive qualities and promoting empathy, understanding, and justice, we can work towards countering the debasing effects of cruelty and fostering a more compassionate world.



Biden Administration Staffers Demand Gaza Ceasefire In Demonstration Outside Of White House

Peace activism in Israel

Peace activism is about promoting peace resulting from right human relations in a spirit of goodwill, understanding that without justice there can’t be a lasting peace.


A nation that occupies another nation
will never be free

Newly-formed anti-war group, which they have named “Gen Zayin,” which means Gen Z
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/03/middleeast/israel-peace-activists-reevaluate-war-hamas-gaza-intl/index.html

“They don’t understand that 7 million Israelis are living here, and aren’t going anywhere, and a lot of Israelis don’t know that the 7 million Palestinians [in Israel and the territories] are not going anywhere either,” he [Rafael] said. “The only way forward is together.”


Human rights activist Ziv Stahl, executive director of the human rights organization Yesh Din, says she is not calling for revenge over what happened that day nor is she taking a pacifist position on Israel’s ensuing war in Gaza against Hamas. “I am not saying ceasefire at any cost,” she said. “Israel has a right to defend itself and protect Israeli citizens,” she explained, but not indiscriminately or at the cost of thousands of Palestinian lives.


Maoz Inon, co-owner of a hostel in Tel Aviv, told CNN he became a peace activist a week after his parents were killed in the October 7 attack. In that moment, he realized that “peace is the only thing that can bring security to everyone living in between the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea,” he said.


Israeli American Elana Kaminka told CNN that her 20-year-old son Yannai was killed as he heroically defended Zikim training base near the border with Gaza.

The grief she feels for the loss of her son is all encompassing. She has struggled to write or continue with her volunteer work, which includes supporting victims of racist violence and transporting unwell Palestinian children to Israeli hospitals.

Kaminka does not have a clear position on the war and, like Stahl, says there are huge security concerns at play, especially when more than 100 hostages remain in Gaza. What she is certain of is that, in the long-term, Jewish-Palestinian coexistence is the only way forward.

If Israelis “really understood what was happening in the territories – the actual practical meaning of the occupation – I think their opinions would be different” … “And for Palestinians, also, it’s very easy to demonize Israelis and every Israeli soldier as a horrible person. It is super easy to live in a bubble where you don’t have any interaction with the other side.”

While pointing to the Palestinian village she used to visit, she said: “We have to find a way to build a common society that feels fair and feels just to as many people as possible.”

Source:


Political Zionism Is Racism

Anti Zionism Is NOT Anti Semitism

A test for the United States

More Americans support Israelis than support Palestinians.
This finding holds across polls. When a Marist poll (conducted for NPR and PBS) asked people which side they sympathized with more, 61 percent chose Israelis and 30 percent chose Palestinians. When YouGov (in a poll for The Economist) asked a similar question with a third option — “about equal” — the results also favored Israelis:

David Leonhardt NYT

WHY?

The Occupation of the American Mind

Over the past few years, Israel’s ongoing military occupation of Palestinian territory and repeated invasions of the Gaza strip have triggered a fierce backlash against Israeli policies virtually everywhere in the world — except the United States. The Occupation of the American Mind takes an eye-opening look at this critical exception, zeroing in on pro-Israel public relations efforts within the U.S.

Narrated by Roger Waters and featuring leading observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and U.S. media culture, the film explores how the Israeli government, the U.S. government, and the pro-Israel lobby have joined forces, often with very different motives, to shape American media coverage of the conflict in Israel’s favor. From the U.S.-based public relations campaigns that emerged in the 1980s to today, the film provides a sweeping analysis of Israel’s decades-long battle for the hearts, minds, and tax dollars of the American people in the face of widening international condemnation of its increasingly right-wing policies.

Narrated by Roger Waters / Featuring Amira Hass, M.J. Rosenberg, Stephen M. Walt, Noam Chomsky, Rula Jebreal, Henry Siegman, Rashid Khalidi, Rami Khouri, Yousef Munayyer, Norman Finkelstein, Max Blumenthal, Phyllis Bennis, Norman Solomon, Mark Crispin Miller, Peter Hart, and Sut Jhally.

The Occupation of the American Mind (original 84-minute version) – YouTube

It was a test for the United States, for it is the American Jews who have created the situation, with relatively little help or endorsement from the Jews of other nations. The United States, urged by expediency, by the financial weight of the Zionists, and by the strategic position of Palestine, have thrown the weight of their influence into the conflict on the side of aggression and of territorial theft. They could have worked for the Principle of Harmony and permitted time and the non-separativeness of the nations to adjust and solve the Jewish problem.

The Rays and the Initiations by Alice A. Bailey (written circa 1948), p. 636


E Pluribus Unum

The Dancing Opposites:

A Statistical Perspective

Understanding complex societal dynamics can be challenging. Complex ideas are often best understood through metaphors, and this is where the world of statistics can lend us a helping hand.

In statistics, we encounter different types of data distributions. Some, like the bimodal distribution, have two distinct peaks, symbolizing two separate groups or opinions. Others, like the standard normal distribution, have a single peak (unimodal distribution), representing unity or consensus within the diversity of the extremes.

Imagine a dance floor where two groups, each moving to their own distinct rhythm, are trying to find a common beat. This scene mirrors a mathematical concept known as a ‘bimodal distribution’ – the graph with two peaks representing two different groups or opinions. Now imagine these groups gradually finding a shared rhythm, moving together around a center until the dance floor pulses with a unified beat. This is akin to a ‘standard normal distribution’ – a graph with one peak indicating a consensus. This dance is similar to the statistical concept of merging two curves into one.

However, transforming a divided society (bimodal curve) into a united one (unimodal curve) isn’t straightforward. Reframing this problem, let’s consider two dancers – labeled Sensitivity and Specificity. Sensitivity would represent the ability to correctly identify truth, while Specificity would signify the capacity to spot falsehood. But they are just labels. Neither really knows what’s really true or false.

In our dance metaphor, these two dancers start on opposite sides of the dance floor (two different peaks). Their dance involves slowly moving towards each other until they share the same spot on the floor, dancing at the same rhythm (one common peak).

E Pluribus Unum.
Although the x-axis shows a constant frame of reference, the center (zero) does actually shift in time, as explained in the text.

This movement signifies societal compromise and dialogue leading to unity. This doesn’t mean that truth and error should be averaged, thus compromising truth. It means that our understanding of truth and error — of good and evil — is always relative to our frame of reference. It is this frame of reference that must find a common ground of ever evolving factual truths, as earlier apparently all-inclusive facts are realized to be but minor aspects of still greater facts.

In real-world terms, Sensitivity and Specificity represent two opposing viewpoints in society. As they move towards a common ground — from what appears to be true and from what appears to be false — they symbolize societal integration. But getting there requires each side to make concessions, to change their steps to meet in the middle, dispassionate detachment from the outer disguises of good and evil, through dialogue, compromise, and the finding of common ground of factual truths.

The key to a successful dance, then, is to move from emotionally-driven positions towards a rational consensus. This shift is like turning down the volume on our emotional reactions to focus on the music’s beat – objective facts and mutually beneficial solutions. It’s about finding that common rhythm that allows the actors to reset to a new frame of reference and share the dance floor harmoniously.

However, it’s essential to remember that our dance metaphor, like all metaphors, is a simplification. Real-world societal dynamics are far more complex, influenced by factors such as power imbalances, systemic biases, and deeply ingrained beliefs. These can throw off the rhythm of our dance, making the path to unity more challenging.

The idea of transforming a bimodal curve into a standard normal curve offers a compelling visualization of societal reconciliation. It reminds us of the importance of dialogue, compromise, and above all, the need for “right human relations based on goodwill.” Right means just.

While statistics can’t capture every nuance of societal dynamics, it provides us with a conceptual framework to better understand our complex world. The transformation from a bimodal curve to a bell-shaped normal curve offers a compelling visualization of societal reconciliation. This dance metaphor may not be perfect, but it gives us a starting point to talk about, and work towards, societal unity.


Post Script

A consensus, unimodal curve does not necessarily imply “regression to the mean.” Progression to new means is not only possible but necessary for a democracy to thrive. However, this new rhythm can be achieved by rational consensus of a common vision (new centers) rather than by divisive emotions of competing selfish interests (old extremes).

We may transform our current bimodal political spectrum into a normal (bell-shaped) curve progressively centered around a positive trend of unbiased means aiming at more inclusive expressions of the common good. The extremes may serve the good purpose of pulling the center without breaking cohesion. Unity does not mean uniformity. However, the center must speak up to better balance the usually more vocal extremes.

The best of the past must be preserved as we embrace the future. Only a healthy, resilient center can accomplish such balance between conservative and progressive values, as we progress and realize that earlier apparently all-inclusive facts are but minor aspects of still greater facts. The greater does not nullify the minor, but enhances it, as is always the case in a hierarchical democracy.


Original 2023.11.28 version. This essay will be under constant revision as the metaphor is revised to make it consistent with the statistical theory of binary classifiers.

2023.11.29: A simpler, and probably more elegant solution, amenable to more flexible interpretations, without compromising statistical principles, would be mixing harmonics so that a normal curve would result, such as:

The bimodal third harmonic transformed into an unimodal normal curve by either its mirror image, shifting its phase angle by 1.5, and mixing with the amplitude of the first harmonic. Only half of the complete first harmonic cycle is shown.

A general model, with a mirror image of the second half of a complete first harmonic cycle.