Conflict resolution

Conflict resolution is a critical process in managing and resolving disputes in various settings, from interpersonal relationships to international diplomacy. The process can be broken down into several stages, which help parties involved move from a position of discord towards agreement and understanding. Here are the general stages of conflict resolution:

  1. Identification of the Problem: Acknowledging that a conflict exists and determining the nature of the conflict.
  2. Communication: Opening lines of communication between the parties involved, allowing them to express their viewpoints and concerns.
  3. Analysis: Understanding the underlying causes and dynamics of the conflict, including the needs, interests, and goals of each party.
  4. Exploration of Options: Identifying potential solutions and compromises through brainstorming and discussion.
  5. Negotiation: Actively seeking an agreement that partially or fully meets the interests of all parties involved.
  6. Mediation (if necessary): Involving a neutral third party to facilitate the resolution process when parties cannot reach an agreement on their own.
  7. Agreement: Coming to a mutually acceptable solution or agreement that addresses the needs and interests of all parties.
  8. Implementation: Putting the agreed-upon solution into action.
  9. Follow-Up: Monitoring the situation to ensure the agreement is upheld and addressing any further issues that may arise.

Difference between Mediation and Negotiation

While both mediation and negotiation are integral parts of the conflict resolution process, they are distinct in their approach and execution:

  • Negotiation involves the parties in conflict directly communicating with each other to try and reach an agreement or solution to their dispute. It is a process that requires compromise and cooperation, with each side presenting its views, interests, and offers. The goal is for all involved parties to come to a mutual agreement without the need for external intervention.
  • Mediation, on the other hand, introduces a neutral third party into the conflict resolution process. This mediator does not have the authority to impose a solution but instead facilitates communication, promotes understanding, and helps the disputing parties find common ground and negotiate an agreement. Mediation is often sought when negotiations have stalled or when the parties find it challenging to communicate effectively on their own.

In summary, while negotiation is a direct dialogue between the conflicting parties aimed at reaching a consensus, mediation involves assistance from an external, neutral facilitator to help bridge gaps, improve communication, and guide the parties towards a voluntary agreement.


Q: How does the balance of power between the parties in conflict affect negotiation and mediation? What if the mediator takes sides with either party?

A: The balance of power between parties in a conflict significantly influences both negotiation and mediation processes. Power dynamics can shape the outcomes of these processes, affecting the fairness and sustainability of agreed solutions.

Balance of Power in Negotiation and Mediation

  • Negotiation: In negotiations, power imbalances can lead to outcomes that heavily favor the stronger party. A party with more resources, information, or alternatives can exert greater influence over the negotiation terms. However, skilled negotiation strategies can sometimes mitigate power imbalances, allowing less powerful parties to leverage their positions more effectively. Techniques include building coalitions, changing the negotiation’s scope, or appealing to external standards of fairness.
  • Mediation: Mediation aims to level the playing field by providing a neutral environment where each party’s needs and interests are given equal consideration. A mediator facilitates dialogue in a way that helps balance power discrepancies, ensuring that all voices are heard and respected. This is particularly important in conflicts where power is unevenly distributed, as it helps to prevent the stronger party from dominating the process and ensures that the outcome is mutually acceptable.

The Issue of a Biased Mediator

If a mediator shows bias or takes sides with either party, it can undermine the mediation process in several ways:

  • Loss of Trust: The effectiveness of mediation largely depends on the trust parties place in the mediator’s neutrality. If a mediator appears biased, the aggrieved party may lose trust in the process and become less willing to cooperate, leading to a breakdown in communication.
  • Impaired Legitimacy: The legitimacy of the mediation process and the acceptability of its outcomes hinge on impartiality. A biased mediator compromises this, making any agreement reached suspect and possibly unsustainable, as it may be viewed as unfair or coerced.
  • Escalation of Conflict: Instead of resolving the conflict, a biased mediation process can exacerbate tensions. If one party feels marginalized or unfairly treated, grievances may deepen, potentially leading to an escalation of the conflict.

To prevent such issues, mediators are trained to recognize and control their biases. Ethical standards and practices in mediation emphasize the importance of neutrality and impartiality. If a mediator finds they cannot maintain neutrality due to personal bias or conflict of interest, ethical practice requires them to withdraw from the mediation process and, if possible, refer the parties to another mediator.

In scenarios where power imbalances exist, or a mediator is perceived as biased, it might be beneficial for the parties to seek co-mediation, where two mediators representing diverse perspectives or interests facilitate the process together. This can help ensure a more balanced and impartial approach to resolving the conflict.


Q: How should negotiation and mediation operate when one party has legitimate authority over the other, such as parents of minors?

A: When one party has legitimate authority over the other, such as in the case of parents and minors, negotiation and mediation must adapt to this unique power dynamic while still striving for fair and constructive outcomes. The goal remains to resolve conflicts in a manner that respects all parties’ needs and interests, even within the framework of an inherently unequal power relationship. Here’s how negotiation and mediation can be effectively applied in such contexts:

Negotiation with Legitimate Authority

In situations where one party holds authority over another:

  • Acknowledge the Power Dynamic: It’s important for the authority figure (e.g., a parent) to acknowledge the power imbalance openly but also to express a genuine willingness to listen and consider the other party’s perspective (e.g., their child’s).
  • Empowerment: Encourage the less powerful party to express their views, needs, and feelings openly. This can involve setting clear expectations that their input is valuable and will be considered in decision-making processes.
  • Focus on Interests: Both parties should focus on underlying interests rather than positions. For parents, understanding the child’s needs, fears, or desires behind their behavior or demands can lead to more empathetic and effective solutions.
  • Educate and Guide: Use the negotiation process as an opportunity for education and guidance. Parents can explain their rationale for certain decisions, helping their children understand the broader context or consequences.

Mediation with Legitimate Authority

Even within hierarchical relationships, mediation can play a valuable role:

  • Neutral Facilitator: A mediator can help ensure that the conversation remains respectful and that the less powerful party feels heard. In family disputes, mediators often work to balance the inherent power dynamic by giving minors a stronger voice in the discussion.
  • Safe Environment: Creating a safe and confidential environment is crucial. It encourages open communication and allows minors to share their perspectives without fear of immediate reprisal or judgment.
  • Solution-Focused: The mediator helps all parties move towards a mutually acceptable solution, emphasizing the well-being of the minor while respecting the parent’s authority and responsibility.
  • Building Understanding: The process can help each party better understand the other’s viewpoint, fostering empathy and strengthening the relationship in the long term.

When one party holds legitimate authority over the other, special care must be taken to ensure that negotiation and mediation do not simply reinforce existing power imbalances but instead work towards equitable and beneficial outcomes. In the context of parents and minors, this often involves balancing authority with empathy, listening, and a genuine effort to understand and meet the legitimate needs of the child. The ultimate aim is to resolve conflicts in a way that supports the minor’s development while maintaining healthy and respectful family dynamics.


Q: How should negotiation and mediation operate when one party has administrative or academic authority over the other, such as, in the university setting, i) administrators and faculty, and ii) faculty and students?

A: Negotiation and mediation within a university setting, whether between administrators and faculty or faculty and students, require careful consideration of the inherent power dynamics while striving for fairness, respect, and constructive outcomes. The principles guiding these processes should focus on equity, mutual respect, and the preservation of professional and academic relationships. Here’s how negotiation and mediation can be effectively applied in these contexts:

1. Administrators and Faculty

Negotiation:

  • Mutual Respect: Recognize the professional expertise and contributions of faculty members while acknowledging the administrative perspective and responsibilities towards the institution.
  • Transparent Communication: Both parties should strive for open and clear communication. Administrators should be transparent about institutional constraints, policies, and decision-making processes.
  • Collaborative Problem-Solving: Engage in joint problem-solving where both parties contribute to finding solutions that align with the institution’s academic mission and respect faculty rights and autonomy.
  • Professional Development and Support: Negotiations can also cover aspects of professional development, resources, and support for faculty to fulfill their teaching, research, and service obligations effectively.

Mediation:

  • Neutral Mediator: A mediator with experience in academia can help bridge understanding between administrators and faculty, addressing issues impartially.
  • Focus on Interests: The mediator can guide discussions towards identifying and addressing the underlying interests and concerns of both parties.
  • Confidential Process: Ensuring confidentiality encourages open dialogue and allows parties to express concerns without fear of reprisal or damage to professional reputations.
  • Preserving Relationships: Mediation aims to resolve disputes in a way that maintains or even strengthens professional relationships and fosters a collaborative work environment.

2. Faculty and Students

Negotiation:

  • Empowerment: Faculty should encourage students to articulate their needs, perspectives, and challenges while providing an environment where students feel their voices are respected.
  • Educational Opportunity: Use negotiation as a teachable moment to help students develop their own negotiation and advocacy skills in a respectful and constructive manner.
  • Flexibility and Fairness: Faculty can demonstrate flexibility in resolving conflicts (e.g., regarding assignments, grades) while maintaining academic standards and fairness to all students.
  • Clear Expectations: Both parties should have clear, shared understandings of academic expectations, policies, and outcomes from the negotiation.

Mediation:

  • Student-Faculty Mediation Programs: Some universities offer mediation services specifically designed to address disputes between faculty and students, providing a structured process for resolution.
  • Neutral Mediator: A mediator familiar with academic environments can help ensure that discussions are balanced, fair, and focused on educational outcomes.
  • Solution-Focused: Mediation seeks to find practical and mutually acceptable solutions that respect the student’s needs and the faculty’s academic standards.
  • Relationship Building: Effective mediation can help build positive relationships between faculty and students, characterized by mutual respect and understanding.

In both scenarios, the key is balancing the authority held by one party with the need to foster an environment of respect, open communication, and mutual benefit. Whether dealing with academic or administrative conflicts, the aim is to achieve resolutions that uphold the institution’s values and mission while respecting individual rights and professional responsibilities.


Q: What if factual truths favor one party? How should a mediator operate? Say, Galileo negotiating with the Church authorities about the factual truth of the heliocentric model of the universe?

A: In cases where factual truths favor one party, as in a hypothetical negotiation between Galileo and the Church authorities regarding the heliocentric model of the universe, the role of the mediator becomes particularly nuanced. The primary objective of mediation is not to establish factual truth but to facilitate a process through which parties can come to a mutual understanding or agreement despite their differences. However, when factual truths are central to the conflict, the mediator must carefully balance respect for these truths with the mediation principles of neutrality and impartiality. Here’s how a mediator might operate in such scenarios:

Acknowledge the Factual Basis

  • Recognition of Facts: The mediator can acknowledge the existence of factual evidence without positioning themselves as an arbiter of that truth. This involves recognizing the facts presented by one party while also understanding the values, beliefs, or interests that might cause the other party to dispute or devalue those facts.

Facilitate Understanding

  • Educational Role: While remaining neutral, the mediator can facilitate a process where the party disputing the facts is encouraged to explore or understand the factual basis put forward by the other side. This can involve asking questions that lead to reflection or suggesting the inclusion of expert opinions if appropriate.
  • Empathy and Respect: Encourage each party to express their views and listen to the other side. Understanding doesn’t necessarily mean agreement, but it can lead to a more informed dialogue where decisions are made with a full appreciation of the facts and their implications.

Focus on Interests Rather Than Positions

  • Identifying Underlying Interests: The mediator should help both parties move beyond their initial positions (e.g., “The Earth is at the center of the universe” vs. “The Sun is at the center of the universe”) to explore the underlying interests or concerns driving those positions (e.g., preservation of religious authority vs. advancement of scientific knowledge).
  • Creative Problem-Solving: Once underlying interests are understood, the mediator can guide the parties in exploring creative solutions or compromises that address those interests. In historical contexts like Galileo’s conflict, this might involve negotiating ways to pursue scientific inquiry that do not directly challenge prevailing doctrines or finding alternative platforms for discussion.

Long-Term Relationship Building

  • Future Dialogue: Especially in conflicts involving deeply held beliefs or interpretations of truth, mediators can work towards establishing mechanisms for ongoing dialogue and review. This could involve setting up panels, discussions, or collaborative inquiries involving representatives from both sides.

Ethical Considerations

  • Ethical Dilemmas: Mediators must be aware of the ethical implications of their role, especially when factual truths are involved. They should avoid enabling the spread of misinformation or contributing to harm caused by ignoring established facts. At the same time, they must maintain their commitment to impartiality and respect for all parties.

In the case of Galileo and the Church, a mediator would face the challenging task of respecting the empirical evidence supporting the heliocentric model while navigating the Church’s doctrinal opposition. The goal would not be to convince the Church of Galileo’s position outright but to find a way for both parties to engage respectfully and constructively, perhaps by focusing on shared interests like the pursuit of knowledge and the welfare of the broader community.


Dear reader: The previous Q&A was generated by querying an AI chatbot. The reader is encouraged to apply the principles of conflict resolution to the current student unrest throughout university campuses in the United States, as well as to the Israel Palestine conflict in the Middle East.

What are the factual historical truths since the creation of Israel in 1948? Have fair negotiations been held? Has the United States been a fair mediator in the conflict? Have crimes of war and acts of terrorism been committed by both parties in the conflict? Is the current situation of the civilian population in Gaza ethically sustainable? Does the United States bear any responsibility for it? Should the United Nations, the international community, and the International Court of Justice intervene? -JB


An ethical mediator

An ethical mediator operates under the principles of neutrality, impartiality, and confidentiality, aiming to facilitate a process where parties can find mutually acceptable resolutions to their disputes. However, the ethical guidelines that govern mediation also require mediators to consider the broader implications of their work, including adherence to principles of justice and integrity. This raises important questions about the role of the mediator in conflicts involving established truths and falsehoods.

Quitting the Role of Mediator

A mediator should consider stepping down or reframing their role in situations where:

  • Continuation Impedes Justice: If continuing the mediation would contribute to injustice or harm, particularly when one party’s position is based on clear falsehoods or misinformation that has significant negative implications.
  • Violation of Ethical Standards: If the mediation process requires the mediator to compromise their ethical standards by giving equal weight to falsehoods or by ignoring established truths in a way that could mislead participants or the public.
  • Inability to Remain Neutral: If the mediator finds they cannot maintain neutrality due to the nature of the falsehoods being presented or because of the ethical implications of the dispute.

Ethically Sustainable Mediation Between Truth and Falsehood

Mediation between an established truth and a falsehood might be considered ethically sustainable in limited contexts:

  • Exploratory Dialogue: The process is framed not as validating falsehood but as exploring understandings, perceptions, and the reasons behind the conflict. This can involve acknowledging that the disagreement exists without lending credibility to falsehoods.
  • Educational Purpose: The mediation serves an educational purpose, helping parties understand the factual basis behind positions, provided it does not legitimize falsehood or mislead participants.
  • Focus on Underlying Interests: The mediation focuses on addressing underlying interests rather than debating the veracity of facts. For example, if a conflict arises from fear, misunderstanding, or a sense of threat, addressing those emotional underpinnings can be valid without needing to compromise on factual truths.
  • Promoting Critical Thinking: Encouraging parties to critically examine evidence and sources, fostering a culture of inquiry and openness to learning, without positioning the mediator as an arbiter of truth.

Mediator’s Responsibility

Mediators have a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the mediation process. This includes:

  • Clarifying the Role: Making clear to all parties that mediation is about finding resolution and understanding, not adjudicating truth or validating perspectives.
  • Referral or Termination: When mediation cannot proceed without compromising ethical principles, mediators should refer parties to a more appropriate forum for resolving their dispute, such as a court or a scientific panel, or terminate their involvement.
  • Transparency: Being transparent about the limitations of the mediation process in resolving conflicts rooted in factual disagreements and the potential need for alternative approaches to establish or contest facts.

Ultimately, an ethical mediator must balance their commitment to neutrality with a broader ethical commitment to truth, justice, and the well-being of individuals and communities. When faced with conflicts between established truth and falsehood, mediators must carefully consider whether their involvement would promote understanding and resolution or inadvertently legitimize falsehood and contribute to harm.


The Hands of the Cosmic Clock

Four postulates about the astrology

  1. There is no astrological causation on human events. The geocentric planetary placements in the tropical zodiac, and their cyclical angular configurations relative to zodiacal asterisms and other planets, do not determine collective or personal outcomes on planet Earth.
  2. Astrology is an archetypal language recognizing the multidimensionality, intra-dimensional variability, and polyvalence of astrological archetypes, thus underscoring their inherent indeterminism.
  3. The geocentric planetary placements in the tropical zodiac, and their cyclical angular configurations relative to zodiacal asterisms and other planets, may be poetically construed as a rich archetypal and metaphoric language providing meaning to human events.
  4. According to Jung’s synchronicity principle, planetary cycles may be narrated in an archetypal language conveying meaningful non-causal associations (meaningful coincidences) correlated with human events.

These four postulates about the psychological science of astrology do present different, yet somewhat overlapping perspectives. They are not entirely orthogonal, meaning they are not completely independent or unrelated to each other. Let’s analyze their relationships:

  1. Postulate 1 (No Astrological Causation): This postulate fundamentally contradicts the premise of astrology having any meaningful connection to human events, standing as a distinctly skeptical perspective.
  2. Postulate 2 (Astrology as Archetypal Language) and Postulate 3 (Astrology as Metaphoric Language): These two postulates can arguably be merged into one broader concept. Both view astrology as a symbolic language that provides meaning to human events through its archetypal representations. The main difference lies in the emphasis: Postulate 2 focuses on the multidimensionality and variability of astrological archetypes, while Postulate 3 emphasizes the poetic interpretation of these symbols.
  3. Postulate 4 (Jung’s Synchronicity Principle): This postulate introduces the concept of synchronicity, which is a unique perspective, but it also aligns with the notion of astrology as a symbolic language (Postulates 2 and 3). It could be seen as a specific application or interpretation of this symbolic language.

In order to achieve conceptual orthogonality, we could potentially merge Postulates 2, 3, and 4 into a single postulate that views astrology as a symbolic language that provides meaning to human events, with inherent multidimensionality, variability, and potential for revealing synchronistic connections. This leaves us with two orthogonal (yin-yang) postulates: one rejecting any astrological influence and one viewing astrology as a rich, symbolic framework for understanding human experience.


Astrological Archetypes and the Cosmic Clock: An Examination Through Four Postulates

Introduction:

Astrology, often seen as a pseudoscience, has been a part of human culture for centuries. Its archetypal language provides a rich narrative that helps us navigate life’s complexities. This first section of the essay explores the astrological archetypes of outer, slow-moving planets (Pluto, Neptune, Uranus (Prometheus), Saturn, and Jupiter) as hands of a cosmic clock through the lens of four postulates about the psychological science of astrology.

Astrological Archetypes and Their Roles:

The outer planets, often referred to as “transpersonal planets,” represent collective unconscious forces. Pluto symbolizes transformation and regeneration, Neptune represents dreams and illusions, Uranus (Prometheus) signifies individuality and revolution, Saturn embodies structure and discipline, and Jupiter denotes expansion and abundance1.

Postulate One: Lack of Astrological Influence on Human Events:

From the perspective of the first postulate, these planetary archetypes do not have a direct, causal impact on human events or personal outcomes. In this view, the significance of the synodic cycle of Pluto and Uranus since the 1960s, a period marked by intense cultural and societal upheaval, would be seen as coincidental rather than causally related to the planetary movements2.

Postulates Two and Three: Astrology as an Archetypal and Metaphoric Language:

The second and third postulates offer a different perspective, suggesting that the geocentric planetary placements in the tropical zodiac can be construed as a rich archetypal and metaphoric language providing meaning to human events. From this viewpoint, the synodic cycle of Pluto and Uranus can be interpreted as a symbolic narrative of transformative (Pluto) and revolutionary (Uranus) energies, reflecting the societal changes and cultural shifts of the 1960s3.

Postulate Four: Jung’s Synchronicity Principle:

The fourth postulate, based on Carl Jung’s synchronicity principle, posits that planetary cycles may be narrated in an archetypal language conveying meaningful non-causal associations correlated with human events. In this view, the Pluto-Uranus synodic cycle could be seen as synchronistically aligned with the cultural and societal upheaval of the 1960s, providing a meaningful narrative of these historical events4.

Conclusion:

The four postulates provide diverse perspectives on the psychological science of astrology, each offering unique insights into the interpretation of astrological archetypes and their correlation with human events. While they differ in their views on the direct influence of celestial bodies on human affairs, they all recognize the value of astrology as a symbolic language that can provide unique insights into the human experience.

Footnotes

  1. Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology
  2. Astrology and Science: An Examination of the Evidence, Paul R. Thagard
  3. An Introduction to Archetypal Astrological Analysis
  4. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle, Carl G. Jung

Astrological Archetypes of Outer Planets: The Hands of the Cosmic Clock

Introduction:

Astrology, often dismissed as pseudoscience, has been an integral part of human culture for centuries. Its archetypal language provides a rich tapestry of meanings that help us navigate the complexities of human life. This section explores the astrological archetypes of the outer, slow-moving planets (Pluto, Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, and Jupiter) and interprets them as hands of a cosmic clock.

Planetary Archetypes and Their Roles:

As already mentioned, the outer planets, often referred to as “transpersonal planets,” represent collective unconscious forces. Pluto symbolizes transformation and regeneration, Neptune represents dreams and illusions, Uranus signifies individuality and revolution, Saturn embodies structure and discipline, and Jupiter denotes expansion and abundance123.

The Significance of the Synodic Cycle of Pluto and Uranus:

The synodic cycle of Pluto and Uranus since the 1960s has been marked by periods of intense cultural and societal upheaval. These two planets represent transformation (Pluto) and revolution (Uranus). Their interactions have coincided with major shifts in societal norms and values, such as the civil rights movement, the sexual revolution, and significant technological advancements4.

The Looming Constitutional Crisis in the USA:

In the context of the upcoming 2024 US presidential election, the progression of these outer planets could indicate a potential constitutional crisis. The USA’s birth chart, based on the Gemini-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, shows Pluto in Capricorn, indicating a period of deconstruction and transformation of structures of power5. As Pluto moves into Aquarius, this could signify major breakthroughs and radical changes in societal structures, potentially leading to a constitutional crisis.

Pluto’s Return and Transition from Capricorn to Aquarius:

Pluto’s 248-year cycle coincides with its return to the same position it held during the USA’s birth. This “Pluto Return” signifies a time of deep transformation and upheaval. As Pluto moves from Capricorn to Aquarius, we can expect radical changes, breakthroughs, and perhaps even a reformation of societal structures56.

Outer Planets Changing Tropical Signs Around 2025:

The transition of most outer planets into new tropical signs around 2025 suggests a period of significant global change. Each planet’s shift into a new sign brings a shift in collective focus and challenges, potentially leading to major societal transformations7.

The 20-Year Synodic Cycle of Jupiter and Saturn:

The 20-year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn has been associated with notable historical events since the US civil war in the 1860s. Jupiter represents growth and expansion, while Saturn signifies structure and limitation. Their cycle reflects societal growth (Jupiter) within the bounds of societal structures (Saturn). Key events in these cycles have corresponded with periods of tension and release in societal structures8.

Conclusion:

Astrology provides an archetypal language that can offer valuable insights into human events and collective experiences. The movements of the outer planets, seen as the hands of a cosmic clock, could reflect the ebb and flow of societal transformations over time. As we approach critical astrological junctures, we can anticipate significant shifts in our collective trajectory.

Footnotes

  1. Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology
  2. An Introduction to Archetypal Astrological Analysis
  3. Planetary Gods: Accessing the Archetypes Through Astrology
  4. Holotropic Research and Archetypal Astrology
  5. Nation: USA No.1 2
  6. Contemporary Western Astrology: A Conceptual and Philosophical Critique 2022
  7. Planets in Play: How to Reimagine Your Life Through the Language of Astrology
  8. Jung’s Mythical Journey-Astrology, Archetypes, the Sun and the Self

The Cultural Significance of the 1960s and the Uranus-Pluto Conjunction

Introduction:

The 1960s was a decade marked by significant cultural and societal shifts, from the explosion of popular music to the Civil Rights Movement. This section explores the cultural significance of events in the 1960s and their correlation with the Uranus-Pluto conjunction, a significant astrological event that occurred during the same period.

Cultural Significance of Events in the 1960s:

The 1960s was a decade of vibrant colors, drug use, free love, and artistic expression1. Events such as the first televised presidential debate, the Bay of Pigs incident, and the Cuban missile crisis defined the political landscape2. The era also saw the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the Civil Rights Movement led by Martin Luther King Jr., and the escalation of the Vietnam War34.

Astrological Significance of the Uranus-Pluto Conjunction:

In astrology, the conjunction of Uranus (symbolic of individuality and revolution) and Pluto (representing transformation and regeneration) is considered a time of intense change and upheaval5. The synodic cycle of these two planets in the 1960s coincided with significant societal changes.

Correlation Between the Cultural Events and the Uranus-Pluto Conjunction:

Viewed through the lens of astrological symbolism, the conjunction of Uranus and Pluto can be seen as a reflection of the transformative and revolutionary energies of the 1960s. The Civil Rights Movement, for instance, embodied the revolutionary spirit of Uranus and the transformative power of Pluto. Similarly, the explosion of popular music and the counterculture movement could be seen as expressions of the disruptive Uranian energy and the transformative Plutonian force.

Conclusion:

While there is no empirical evidence to suggest a causal relationship between planetary movements and human events, the correlation between the cultural shifts of the 1960s and the Uranus-Pluto conjunction provides a compelling narrative. It underscores the value of astrology as a symbolic language that can offer unique insights into the collective human experience.

Footnotes

  1. “1960s America | History, Culture & Social Changes”, study.com
  2. “The Sixties . Timeline . Text Version”, pbs.org
  3. “Major Historical and Cultural Events of the 1960’s in America”, prezi.com
  4. “What Happened in the 1960s inc. News, Popular Culture …”, thepeoplehistory.com
  5. “Astrological Archetypes and the Cosmic Clock: An Examination Through Four Postulates”, Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology

The Astrological Archetypes and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: An Examination of Uranus and Pluto Movements

Introduction:

The Uranus-Pluto cycle in astrology has been associated with periods of significant societal change and upheaval. This section explores the potential correlation between the movements of these planets, particularly their aspects in 2015 and 2025, and the projected constitutional crisis in the United States for the November 5, 2024 presidential election, using the Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence1. In this birth chart, Sagittarius, symbolizing exploration and the quest for truth, might indicate the nation’s ongoing journey toward realizing its democratic ideals. The placement of Pluto in the second house of values and resources could suggest the potential for a deep transformation in these areas, as well as the corruption of power through vested interests.

Astrological Archetypes and Their Roles:

Uranus symbolizes revolution and individuality, while Pluto represents transformation and regeneration2. Their conjunction in the 1960s coincided with a period of intense cultural and societal upheaval3.

The Uranus-Pluto Cycle and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election:

The opening square between Uranus and Pluto in 2015 marked a period of tension and conflict, which could be interpreted as a precursor to the looming constitutional crisis4. As this aspect eases into a trine in 2025, it could suggest possible resolutions or transformations arising from this crisis. This resolutions may result in either the rise of fascism (imposed “peace”), or the renovation of the democratic ideal of true and lasting peace through goodwill and right human relations, in preparation for the externalization of the planetary spiritual Hierarchy and the physical reappearance of the World Teacher.

Astrology does not predict; it only indicates opportunities for transformative processes that may unfold right or wrong. Thus, the need to train humanity in the right use of its free will, as suggested in the principles of a hierarchical democracy.

JB

The Natal USA Chart and Its Implications:

In the Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, considered the birth chart of the United States, Uranus is in Gemini in the seventh house, indicating a revolutionary spirit in relationships with other nations5. On the other hand, Pluto in Capricorn in the second house suggests a positive or negative transformative force in terms of values and resources6.

The transits of Pluto and Uranus conjunct with their placements in the natal USA chart around the time of the 2024 election may intensify these themes. These transits could indicate a deep transformation (Pluto) in the nation’s values and resources and a revolution (Uranus) in its relationships with other nations, possibly reflecting the constitutional crisis.

Conclusion:

While there is no empirical evidence to suggest a causal relationship between planetary movements and human events, the correlation between the Uranus-Pluto cycle and the potential constitutional crisis around the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election provides a compelling narrative. It underscores the value of astrology as a symbolic language that can offer unique insights into collective human experiences.

Footnotes

  1. “Nation: USA No.1”, astro.com
  2. “Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology”
  3. “The Uranus-Pluto Conjunction of the 1960s and Its Effects on Culture”, astro.com
  4. “The Uranus-Pluto Square 2012-2015”, astro.com
  5. “The Declaration Chart”, mountainastrologer.com
  6. “Astrology and the United States: The Making of America”, astrologynewsreport.com

The Astrological Archetypes and Global Upheaval: An Examination of Outer Planets Changing Tropical Signs Around 2025

Introduction:

This section explores the correlation between the anticipated shift of most outer planets changing tropical signs around 2025, and the current social and political upheaval worldwide.

Astrological Archetypes and Their Roles:

Outer planets, such as Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, symbolize revolution, dreams, and transformation, respectively1. When these planets change tropical signs, it often corresponds with significant societal changes.

Impact of Outer Planets Changing Tropical Signs Around 2025:

The imminent shift of most outer planets into new tropical signs around 2025 could signal a period of substantial global transformation. These movements might correlate with the current social and political upheaval worldwide, suggesting an intensification or culmination of these issues by 202523.

Correlation with Current Social and Political Upheaval:

The world is currently experiencing significant social and political upheaval, from climate change to political polarization45. The impending shift of outer planets could reflect this turmoil, symbolizing a period of intense change and transformation. For example, Uranus’ entry into Gemini could indicate a revolution in communication, while Neptune’s move into Aries might suggest a collective dream of new beginnings6.

Conclusion:

While astrology does not provide empirical evidence for causality, the correlation between the movement of outer planets and global social and political upheaval offers a symbolic narrative. It underscores the potential of astrology to provide unique insights into collective human experiences, suggesting that the anticipated astrological shifts around 2025 might correlate with a climax in the current global upheaval.

Footnotes

  1. “Gods and Planets: The Archetypes of Astrology”
  2. “Astrophysical data: Planets and stars”, books.google.com
  3. “Neptune and Triton: Essential pieces of the Solar System puzzle”, sciencedirect.com
  4. “The impact of climate change on tropical diseases spread”, researchgate.net
  5. “Macroshift: Navigating the transformation to a sustainable world”, books.google.com
  6. “Planets in Signs”, astrostyle.com

The Pluto Shift from Capricorn to Aquarius: An Astrological Perspective on Global Change

Introduction:

The transition of Pluto from Capricorn to Aquarius, which occurred in January 2024, is a significant astrological event. Pluto, an outer planet representing transformation, death, and rebirth, changes signs approximately every 21 (from 12 to 31) years1. This section explores the implications of this shift and its potential correlation with global changes.

Pluto’s Transition from Capricorn to Aquarius:

Pluto’s transit through Capricorn, starting in 2008, was associated with a focus on structure, authority, and material success2. As Pluto moved into Aquarius in 2024, it signaled a shift towards matters related to innovation, community, and humanitarian values3.

Implications for Global Change:

Aquarius symbolizes innovation, freedom, and collective well-being4. Pluto’s entry into this sign may imply a period of profound transformation in these areas. Considering the current social and political upheaval worldwide, this shift could symbolize a collective move towards more progressive, humanitarian, and innovative solutions5.

Conclusion:

While astrology does not provide empirical evidence for causality, the correlation between the movement of Pluto from Capricorn to Aquarius and global changes offers a symbolic narrative. It underscores the potential of astrology to provide unique insights into collective human experiences, suggesting that the anticipated astrological shifts might correlate with a shift in global consciousness towards more innovative and humanitarian values.

Footnotes

  1. “Pluto In Astrology: The Planet of Power”, astrology-zodiac-signs.com
  2. “Pluto in Capricorn”, astrostyle.com
  3. “Pluto in Aquarius Is Bringing More Unprecedented Times”, thecut.com
  4. “Aquarius Zodiac Sign: Characteristics, Dates, & More”, astrology.com
  5. “Pluto in Aquarius Will Affect Every Zodiac Sign 2024-2044”, stylecaster.com

Astrological Cycles, Civil Unrest and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: A Correlative Study

Introduction:

Astrology has long been used to interpret societal shifts and changes. This last section of the essay explores the correlation between the 20-year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn since the U.S. civil war in the 1860s, Steve Bannon’s thesis of an imminent next civil war in the USA, and the looming constitutional crisis for the November 5, 2024 presidential election. The Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, considered the birth chart of the United States1, will be used as reference.

Jupiter and Saturn Synodic Cycle:

The Jupiter-Saturn cycle, occurring approximately every 20 years, is often associated with socio-political change2. Since the U.S. Civil War in the 1860s, this cycle has coincided with significant shifts in American society and politics3.

Steve Bannon’s Thesis of an Imminent Civil War:

Steve Bannon, a key figure in the Trump administration, has proposed the thesis of an imminent next civil war in the U.S., known as the “Fourth Turning.” He suggests that the country is on the verge of a crisis that could culminate in civil strife4.

Correlation with the Looming Constitutional Crisis:

The upcoming 2024 presidential election has been predicted to potentially trigger a constitutional crisis. Considering Bannon’s thesis and the current Jupiter-Saturn cycle, these astrological movements could symbolize the escalation of tensions leading up to this event5.

The Sagittarius-rising Chart and Its Implications:

In the Sagittarius-rising chart for the Declaration of Independence, Jupiter is in Cancer in the eighth house, indicating a nation’s growth through transformation and shared resources6. Saturn, in Libra in the tenth house, suggests a country’s structure and authority is balanced through justice7. The Jupiter-Saturn cycle, in relation to their placements in the U.S. birth chart, could suggest a period of significant transformation and rebalancing in the nation’s socio-political landscape.

Conclusion:

While astrology does not provide empirical evidence for causality, the correlation between the Jupiter-Saturn cycle, Bannon’s thesis, and the potential constitutional crisis offers a compelling narrative. It underscores astrology’s potential to provide unique insights into collective experiences, suggesting that the upcoming astrological shifts might correlate with significant socio-political changes in the U.S.

Footnotes

  1. “Nation: USA No.1”, astro.com
  2. “The Jupiter-Saturn Cycle”, astro.com
  3. “Jupiter and Saturn and Pluto, Oh My! Social Planets and Cycles”, astrodienst.com
  4. “Devil’s Bargain: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, and the Nationalist Uprising”, books.google.com
  5. “The Civil War in the American ruling class”, triple-c.at
  6. “The Declaration Chart”, mountainastrologer.com
  7. “Astrology and the United States: The Making of America”, astrologynewsreport.com

The Uranus Neptune Pluto Triangle of 2024–2027

The mini triangle configuration is also called a transiting midpoint which is something that happens two or three times each century, so they’re quite rare. They usually have either Uranus or Pluto at the midpoint between the other two planets, while Neptune midpoints happen only once every 500 years. The last time Neptune was at the midpoint was in 1504!

https://jessicadavidson.co.uk/2023/11/13/the-uranus-neptune-pluto-triangle-2024-2027/


Breaking the MAGA Cult

Republicans who will gather to cast the first votes of the 2024 presidential primary season have one essential responsibility: to nominate a candidate who is fit to serve as president, one who will “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Donald Trump, who has proved himself unwilling to do so, is manifestly unworthy.

This is not a partisan concern. It is good for the country when both major parties have qualified presidential candidates to put forward their competing views on the role of government in American society. Voters deserve such a choice in 2024.

Mr. Trump’s construction of a cult of personality in which loyalty is the only real requirement has badly damaged the Republican Party and the health of American democracy.

Mr. Trump’s record of contempt for the Constitution — and his willingness to corrupt people, systems and processes to his advantage — puts all of it at risk.

NYT Editorial
The Post’s model does this by using precinct-level results from both years, as well as demographic data, to determine the likely share of voters a 2024 candidate picked up..

I asked my AI personal assistant, how do you break a spell?

Breaking a spell can be a complex process, depending on the nature of the spell and the belief system in which it was cast. However, here is a general guideline that is often recommended in various traditions:

  1. Identify the Spell: Firstly, you need to identify the type of spell that has been cast. This can be tricky, but if you’ve been subjected to a spell, there might be signs such as recurring bad luck, unexplained illnesses, or a series of unfortunate events.
  2. Cleanse Yourself and Your Environment: This usually involves some sort of ritual cleansing. This could be a bath with specific herbs or salts known for their cleansing properties, burning sage (also known as smudging), or using sound like bells or singing bowls to dispel negative energy.
  3. Protection: You can protect yourself by visualizing a protective shield around you, wearing or carrying protective symbols, or invoking protection from a higher power you believe in.
  4. Reverse or Neutralize the Spell: Depending on your beliefs, this could involve casting a counter-spell, using a charm or talisman, or praying for the spell to be lifted.
  5. Seek Professional Help: If you’re not comfortable dealing with this on your own, you may want to seek the help of a professional spell breaker or spiritual advisor.

Remember, these guidelines are based on various traditions and belief systems. The effectiveness of these steps can vary greatly depending on personal beliefs and the specifics of the situation.

Jasper.ai

But I’m not a superstitious person.
How can I scientifically break a spell?

From a scientific perspective, the concept of a “spell” or “hex” is not supported, as they are typically associated with supernatural or paranormal beliefs. However, the feeling of being under a spell might be more related to psychological factors, such as the power of suggestion or the placebo/nocebo effect.

The placebo/nocebo effect is a fascinating aspect of human psychology where our expectations and beliefs can influence our physical health. For example, if someone believes they’ve been cursed or hexed, their belief can manifest in physical symptoms. Conversely, believing that a spell has been broken can alleviate those symptoms.

In this case, one way to “break a spell” scientifically could be to use cognitive-behavioral techniques to change your beliefs and perceptions about the spell. This could involve challenging irrational thoughts, using relaxation techniques to manage anxiety, or seeking help from a mental health professional.

Another approach is understanding that energy is just energy; it’s neither divine nor evil. As Sadhguru mentions, it’s up to us how we interpret and react to it. This perspective can help you navigate your feelings and reactions to the idea of being under a spell.

Remember, if you’re experiencing distressing symptoms, it’s always a good idea to seek advice from a healthcare provider.

Sources:

  1. Quora
  2. New Scientist
  3. Isha Foundation
Jasper.ai

How would Dean Radin, according to the ideas laid out in his book “Real Magic,” approach the subject of breaking a spell from a noetic perspective?

Dean Radin, a renowned scientist and author known for his work on psi phenomena, approaches the subject of magic from a perspective that blends ancient wisdom with modern science. His book “Real Magic: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science, and a Guide to the Secret Power of the Universe” explores the idea that magic is a natural aspect of reality and something each of us can potentially tap into.

In terms of breaking a spell, though Radin doesn’t provide specific instructions in his book, he might suggest a noetic or consciousness-based approach, given his research focus at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. This could involve using the power of intention and consciousness to counteract the effects of the spell.

Radin’s work often emphasizes the role of belief and expectation in shaping our experiences. He might argue that if you believe a spell has power over you, it can have real effects due to the influence of these beliefs on your consciousness. Conversely, changing your beliefs could be a way to break the spell.

Radin also highlights the potential of meditation and other mind-body practices for cultivating our innate capacities. It’s possible that such practices could be used to help break a spell by shifting your mental state and altering your perceptions.

However, it’s important to note that Radin’s work remains controversial within mainstream science, and his interpretations are not universally accepted. Always seek professional advice if you’re dealing with serious emotional or psychological distress.

Sources:

  1. Real Magic – Dean Radin
  2. Excerpt from Real Magic
  3. Interview with Dr Dean Radin
  4. How To Harness The Power Of “Magic” with Dean Radin PhD
Jasper.ai

The MAGA cult is a spell cast on the United States. The main article of faith of this cult is the belief that Donald J. Trump is the Messiah chosen by God to “make America great again.” Rural America, white Evangelicals and younger people are prone to this spell.

Modern esotericism refers to spells as glamours. The Technique of Light is the recommended way to prevent, negate and destroy the appearance, quality and life of the MAGA cult from affecting the United States and humanity. So may it be prevented, negated and destroyed. -JB



A glimmer of hope


About 1,200 people were killed during the Hamas-led Oct. 7 assault against Israel, a majority of them civilians, according to the Israeli authorities. Israel’s retaliatory war against Hamas in Gaza has killed more than 23,000 Palestinians, a majority of them women and children, according to Gaza health officials.

Warning of a long conflict, the Israeli statements exposed a growing dissonance between the domestic perception of the timing and goals of the war and increasing international impatience in the face of a deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/14/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-war-gaza.html

On the 100th day of a disproportionate vengeful retribution against Palestinian civilians, with inhuman acts of criminal collective punishment conducted with impunity by the Israeli military, the world observes with dismay the complicity with which the United States continues to support crimes of war with taxpayers’ funded offensive weaponry killing Palestinian civilians. This is well beyond the more justifiable support for the defensive Iron Dome.

Of course, using civilians as human shields and taking civilian hostages are also war crimes to be universally condemned without any justification whatsoever, even in an asymmetric warfare. However, the disproportionate death toll of civilians is only comparable to the imbalance of power to negotiate a just and lasting peace between the warring parties. The genocidal rhetoric of Netanyahu and his extreme right coalition adds fuel to the raging fire.

This imbalance of power is the main reason why all previous peace accords between Israel and Palestine have not stood the test of time. This is made clear by Fareed Zakaria’s historical overview in his GPS Special: The Road to War in the Middle East aired on December 24, 2023. 

In the last segment, despite Fareed’s biased question,

Do you think that fundamentally the problem is that the Palestinians, at some point, have not been educated by their leadership to recognize that, look, they’ve lost this long struggle, that they’re not going to get the whole loaf, they’re going to get 22 percent of that loaf? And you have to kind of admit that. And the unwillingness to admit that is — and, you know, the worry that if you admit that you will be assassinated or you’ll get outflanked by Hamas, that that’s been at the core of it, that there isn’t somebody who’s willing to speak honestly to the Palestinians and say, look, this is all we can get?

Fareed Zakaria

the former U.S. Ambassador Edward Djerejian aptly deflects such offensive and patronizing tone, replying instead with wise advice about the course of American diplomacy in this conflict.

At the end of the day there’s 7.2 million Palestinians and 7.2 approximately Israeli Jews in between the Jordan River and the Eastern Mediterranean. Neither one is going to go anywhere. They’re there. They have to divide the land.

Economic peace simply doesn’t work. But that was the trope, and that trope started in the Trump administration and the Biden administration obviously continued that with the normalization. I have nothing against normalization of Arab countries with Israel, but it was done at the cost of neglecting this central issue, the territorial aspects of peace between Israel and Palestine.

First, American diplomacy needs a deep understanding and appreciation of the basic facts on the ground in the Middle East and where the parties are coming from.

Second, we have to have a spine in our diplomacy. We have to be tough on both sides, or else nothing will happen. You know, we started off in 67 Israeli settlements. In U.S. government proclamations, Israeli settlements are illegal under international law, the Geneva Conventions of ’49.

You’ve seen over the years how the verbiage is that, oh, they’re an obstacle to peace, or they’re a problem. No, they’re illegal. The United States [must stand] tall on principle, and we have to do that with both sides: tough on the Arabs; tough on the Israelis. You have to be skillful in your diplomacy also.

The glimmer of hope is that I really do feel that October 7th is so consequential, akin to Yom Kippur in ’73. That the political landscape has changed. I hope one of the major lessons that everyone learns is that you cannot shunt the Palestinian issue aside and make it a secondary or tertiary issue, that you can make economic peace or peace for peace. We have to focus on land for peace.

And let’s make the hard decision to go for it. There’s a lot of diplomatic history in the archives on settlements, on territorial compromises, on Jerusalem, on refugees. There’s a body of negotiations that can be built on. Let’s get the leadership to get it done.

Former U.S. Ambassador Edward Djerejian has been working on diplomacy in the Middle East for more than 50 years. He’s been U.S. Ambassador to Israel, U.S. Ambassador to Syria and the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs.

May his words and experience light the way for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East. On this 100th day of the War on Gaza, it is made clear that the military option is not a viable alternative for a peace accord among equals. -JB


A Fareed Zakaria GPS Special: The Road to War in the Middle East

Why has the Israeli–Palestinian conflict been so intractable for so long? Fareed talks with Palestinian scholar Ahmad Khalidi, Israeli historian Benny Morris, former US diplomat Edward Djerejian and more about the attempts, missed chances, and future prospects of establishing a lasting peace in the region. 

https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/fzgps/date/2023-12-24/segment/01



The Shamballa Force

REALPOLITIK: it’s all about POWER

Realpolitik is a system of politics or principles based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations. The term, which originates from Germany (meaning “the politics of reality”), is often associated with power politics. The approach is characterized by pragmatic and practical considerations, such as the survival of the nation, national security interests, and the balance of power, rather than by ideological or ethical premises.

In Realpolitik, decisions are made based on the factual realities at hand, rather than an adherence to any specific philosophical or ethical ideal. This could mean forming alliances with otherwise unfriendly nations or compromising on values if it leads to increased power or security. The philosophy behind Realpolitik has been practiced throughout history, though the term itself did not come into common usage until the mid-19th century in Europe.

The term “Realpolitik” itself is still widely used today and continues to refer to a system of politics or principles based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations. However, it’s important to note that while the term may remain the same, its interpretation and application can evolve over time and vary between different regions, political systems, and individuals. For example, the concept of Realpolitik has been associated with various political figures throughout history, from its originator Ludwig von Rochau to more contemporary figures like Henry Kissinger. Their approaches, while all falling under the umbrella of Realpolitik, may have differed based on the specific historical and political contexts in which they were operating.

Phrases like “power politics,” “pragmatic diplomacy,” or “political realism,” convey similar ideas and are often used in discussions of foreign policy and international relations. These terms, while not new, reflect the core principles of Realpolitik.

… the THUGS we have inside our Country … are looking to destroy our once great USA. MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4376797-trump-may-they-rot-in-hell-merry-christmas/

The truly evil men

Confound not evil with the activities of the gangster or the criminal. Criminals and gangsters are the result of the emerging massed imperfections: they are the victims of ignorance, mishandling when children and misunderstanding down the ages of right human relations; the Law of Rebirth will eventually lead them on the way to good.

Those men are truly evil who seek to enforce a return to the bad old ways, who endeavor to keep their fellowmen in slavery of some kind or another, who block the expression of one or all of the Four Freedoms, who gain material riches at the expense of the exploited, or who seek to hold for themselves and for gain the produce of the earth, and thus make the cost of life’s necessities prohibitive to those not richly endowed. Those who thus work, think and plan are to be found in every nation, and are usually of prominence because of their riches and influence; however, they sin against light and not through ignorance; their goals are material and not spiritual. They are relatively few compared to the countless millions of men, but are exceedingly powerful; they are highly intelligent but unscrupulous, and it is through them that the Forces of Evil work, holding back progress, promoting poverty, breeding hatred and class distinctions, fostering racial differences for their own ends, and keeping ignorance in power. Their sin is great and it is hard for them to change, because power and the will-to-power (as it militates against the will-to-good) is a dominant all-controlling factor in their lives; these men are today working against the unity of the United Nations, [Page 669] through their greed, their determination to own the resources of the earth (such as oil, mineral wealth and food) and thus keep the people weak and with inadequate food. These men, who are found in every nation, thoroughly understand each other and are working together in great combines to exploit the riches of the earth at the expense of humanity.

The whole problem of evil is, however, too vast to contemplate here, nor is it advisable or wise to discuss the source of evil (not of imperfection), the Black Lodge. Energy follows thought, and the spoken word can be potently evocative: therefore, until one is a member of the Great White Lodge, it is the part of wisdom to avoid consideration of forces potent enough intelligently to use the latent imperfection in humanity and to impose the vast evil of war, with all its results and far-reaching effects, upon humanity. The Black Lodge is the problem of the White Lodge, and not the problem of humanity. For aeons the Hierarchy has handled this problem, and is now in process of solving it. It is essentially, however, the main consideration and problem of Shamballa, for it is connected with the will aspect, and only the will-to-good will suffice to blot out and annihilate the will-to-evil. Goodwill will not suffice, though the united and invocative appeal of the [Page 670] men of goodwill throughout the world-increasingly voiced through the Great Invocation-will serve “to seal the door where evil dwells.”

The Tibetan Master D.K.

Aligned with the principles of the New Group of World Servers, on the presidential ballot for the 2024 elections in the United States:

  • If you are a true conservative pledging allegiance to the Constitution of the United States:
    • vote Democrat, or
    • abstain from voting.
  • If you are a registered Democrat: do NOT stay at home. Vote Democrat on the presidential ballot regardless of the candidate and his/her flaws.
  • If you are an independent voter: vote Democrat.

This is NOT a partisan presidential election. The survival of democracy in the United States is at stake. Men and women of goodwill must support the Four Freedoms, here and now!

1944 pin from the re-election campaign of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

There is a door into an evil realm and into blackness, just as there is a door into a world of goodness and light.

The Tibetan Master D.K.

The progress made by humanity in the past two hundred years has lead to attention from the Council Chamber at Shamballa. The will aspect of divinity has made direct contact with the human mind. Thus, the latent goodwill in humanity has been evoked by the will-to-good from Shamballa. However, the will-to-power has also been evoked in selfish minds.

The origin of evil or the Black Lodge is a vast problem handled by the Hierarchy. Only the will-to-good can counter the will-to-evil, and the united appeal of men of goodwill, expressed through the Great Invocation, serves to seal the door where evil dwells.

It is behind that door and in dealing with the forces there concealed (and mobilized) that the Hierarchy is effective; the methods and modes whereby They protect humanity from mobilized evil, and are gradually driving the evil back, would not be understood by you who have not yet passed through the door which leads to the Way of the Higher Evolution.

The Tibetan Master D.K.

Freewill, Goodwill, Will-to-Good and Will-to-Power

The lines of cleavage have grown steadily until now they can be expressed in terms of a humanity which is oriented towards the higher spiritual and altruistic values and whose keynotes are sacrifice, group good and world understanding, and those whose focus is predominantly material and whose aims are selfish, animated by ambition and the spirit of acquisition.

It was the acuteness of this situation, and the wide extent of the cleavage, which induced the watching Hierarchy to permit a direct inflow of the Shamballa force (in spite of its attendant risks) to pour into the world. The objective was to stimulate the free will of the masses; the result upon them has been relatively good as it has led to the formulation and expression of the great world ideologies—Fascism, [Page 127] Democracy and Communism as well as that peculiarly distorted blend of Fascism and Communism which goes by the name of Hitlerism or Nazism. All these ideologies are fostered by the desire of the masses for the betterment of the condition in which the populace in any country lives and it has become focused, expressive and creative by the force of the Shamballa influence. But another result of this inflow of the will-to-power (power upon the physical plane and through the medium of form activity) has been to stimulate a certain group of outstanding personalities in many lands so that they have assumed control of the masses and can thus determine the policies and methods—religious, political and social—of the different nations. In every nation a relatively small group of people decide all important issues and determine all major national activities. This they do either by force, terror and deception or by persuasion, fair words and the application of ideological motives. Of this situation in the world the Lords of Destiny are availing themselves in order to bring the ancient conflict to an end and so enable humanity to pass into the new Aquarian Age relatively free and with a clearer understanding of right human aims, right relationships and man’s predestined future.

So great has been the progress of man during the past two hundred years that the Council Chamber at Shamballa was forced to take notice. As a result of this attention by the Great Lives around Sanat Kumara and Their interest in the affairs of men, two things happened:

  1. The will aspect of divinity made its first definite and direct contact with the human mind. The impact was direct and not deflected-as had hitherto been the case-to the Hierarchy and from thence to humanity.
  2. At the same time, the will-to-good from Shamballa evoked the latent goodwill in man, so that today and increasingly over the past one hundred years, goodness of heart, kindness in action, consideration for others and mass action to promote human welfare have spread over the Earth.
The Tibetan Master D.K.

Quotes from the Tibetan Master D.K. penned by Alice A. Bailey in the books published by the Lucis Trust.



From Anarchy to Hierarchy

Ray 1. Will Power. Transmitted through Aries, Leo and Capricorn.

As 2023 comes to an end, I’m struggling to make sense of the current world disorder, focusing on three major threats to our survival: Zionism in the Middle East, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the MAGA movement in the United States. They have one common theme: might makes right. They represent causes out of which other evils, such as (Hamas) terrorism, arise. Which makes me wonder, what is power? How can light, love and power restore God’s Plan on Earth?

In the context of the Capricorn full moon period overlapping Sol Invictus observance this Christmas season, let’s review current thought forms created by humanity on this subject, and how can they can be repurposed for a future of right human relations, goodwill and peace on Earth.

-JB

Two key theories of international relations

Structural realism, also known as neorealism, and human nature realism, often referred to as classical realism, are two key theories within the field of international relations. They share a common premise that states exist in an anarchic international system and that they act primarily out of self-interest. However, they differ significantly in their explanations for why this is the case.

Structural Realism (Neorealism): Structural realism, as articulated by theorists like Kenneth Waltz, posits that the behavior of states is determined by the anarchic structure of the international system1. In this system, there’s no overarching authority above the state, making security a primary concern. States, according to structural realists, are rational actors that seek to survive by maintaining and increasing their power relative to other states. The focus here is on the system, not on the individual state or its leaders2.

Human Nature Realism (Classical Realism): Human nature realism, on the other hand, asserts that the behavior of states is driven primarily by human nature. Classical realists like Hans Morgenthau argue that it’s the inherent flaws in human nature, such as the lust for power, that lead to conflict and competition among states3. This perspective focuses more on the role of leadership, national character, and moral and ethical considerations in shaping a state’s foreign policy4.

In summary, while structural realism emphasizes the anarchic structure of the international system as the determinant of state behavior, human nature realism places more emphasis on the characteristics and behaviors of individuals and groups within the state.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  2. International Relations.org
  3. Britannica
  4. International Relations.org

Offensive and defensive realism are two key sub-theories within the school of structural realism in international relations. Both theories agree on the anarchic nature of the international system, but they differ significantly in their views on state behavior and security.

Offensive Realism: Proposed by John Mearsheimer, offensive realism postulates that states are power-maximizers1. In an anarchic international system with no overarching authority, states must always be concerned about their security. To ensure survival, they strive to achieve hegemony, as the best guarantee against attack is to be the most powerful state in the system. Offensive realists believe that states should constantly look for opportunities to gain power at the expense of others2.

Defensive Realism: Defensive realism, associated with theorists like Kenneth Waltz and Robert Jervis, suggests that states are security-maximizers3. While acknowledging the anarchic nature of the international system, defensive realists argue that an aggressive foreign policy often proves counterproductive, provoking other states to form balancing coalitions. Therefore, states should maintain a moderate level of power and pursue cooperative security arrangements to mitigate potential threats4.

In summary, while offensive realists see aggression as a necessity for states to secure their survival, defensive realists advocate for a more moderate and cooperative approach to ensure security in the international system.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. John Mearsheimer’s “The Tragedy of Great Power Politics”
  2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  3. Kenneth Waltz’s “Theory of International Politics”
  4. Oxford Research Encyclopedias

Entropy, Anarchy and the Omega Point

Entropy in physics is a fundamental concept that describes the degree of disorder or randomness in a system. In the context of structural realism in international relations, it can be interpreted as the inherent unpredictability and complexity in the international system due to the absence of a central authority1.

Structural realism asserts that the international system is anarchic, and states are primarily driven by their self-interests for survival and power. This could be seen as a state of high entropy where there’s a high degree of uncertainty and disorder. Structural realists argue that this anarchic structure forces states to act in certain predictable ways, such as balancing against threats, which could be seen as attempts to manage or reduce this entropy2.

On the other hand, Teilhard de Chardin’s concept of the Omega Point presents a contrasting view. The Omega Point theory posits that consciousness and evolution are moving towards a maximum point of complexity and consciousness, known as the Omega Point3. This suggests a progression from high entropy (anarchy) to low entropy (hierarchy), driven by the evolution of consciousness.

In contrast to structural realism which views the international system as inherently conflictual and competitive due to its anarchic nature, the Omega Point theory suggests a more optimistic view of the potential for cooperation and integration as consciousness evolves.

In essence, while entropy and structural realism might highlight the disorder and power struggles in the international system, the Omega Point theory offers a perspective on how evolving consciousness could lead to greater order and unity.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Entropy, technology, and warfare — understanding world politics through physics
  2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  3. Teilhard de Chardin’s The Phenomenon of Man

Liberalism in International Relations

Liberalism is a key theory in international relations that offers an optimistic worldview. It posits that international institutions and interactions can overcome the anarchic nature of the international system, leading to a more cooperative and peaceful world order1.

  1. Democratic Peace Theory: This theory suggests that democracies are less likely to go to war with each other due to shared values, internal constraints, and the transparency of their political systems2. Democratic norms require leaders to resolve disputes through negotiation and compromise, reducing the likelihood of conflict.
  2. Economic Interdependence: According to liberals, economic interdependence reduces the likelihood of war by increasing the costs of conflict and the benefits of peace3. High levels of trade and investment create mutual benefits and dependencies that both sides would not want to jeopardize through military conflict.
  3. Institutionalism: Liberals argue that international institutions, such as the United Nations, play a crucial role in promoting peace and cooperation4. Institutions provide forums for dialogue, help enforce international laws, reduce uncertainty about others’ intentions, and make it more difficult for states to renege on their commitments.

While liberalism recognizes that conflicts and power struggles exist among nations, it emphasizes the potential for cooperation, largely driven by democratic governance, economic ties, and institutional mechanisms.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  2. Oxford Research Encyclopedias
  3. Journal of Peace Research
  4. International Studies Quarterly

Natural Organic Hierarchies

Systems theory posits that systems, whether they are biological ecosystems, social structures, or organizations, are made up of interconnected parts that form a complex whole. This holistic approach emphasizes the interdependence of all system components and their interactions1.

Natural organic hierarchies, as suggested by systems theory, are intrinsic to the organization of many systems in nature. They are characterized by a structure where elements at each level of the hierarchy interact more strongly with each other than with those at different levels2. This hierarchical organization is seen as an inherent property of nature2.

In ecology, for example, the hierarchical structure can be observed in the organization of ecosystems, from individual organisms (lowest level) to populations, communities, ecosystems, and the biosphere (highest level)3. This hierarchy facilitates understanding and analysis of ecological phenomena.

Similarly, in the context of organizations, there are rational, natural, and open systems. Natural systems focus on the human component in organizations, acknowledging that people and their interactions play a crucial role in shaping an organization’s structure and processes4.

The concept of organic hierarchies also extends to areas like organic farming, where systems thinking is reflected in stewardship towards nature, the ethics of animal husbandry, and recycling principles5.

In essence, systems theory’s concept of natural organic hierarchies highlights the interconnectedness and interdependence of elements within a system, facilitating our understanding of complex natural and social phenomena.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Concepts of Systems Thinking
  2. Hierarchical structure of biological systems – PMC 2
  3. The Hierarchical Structure of Ecosystems: Connections to Evolution
  4. Rational, Natural, and Open Systems of Organizations
  5. Systems Theory as a Scientific Approach towards Organic Farming

Symbols

The symbol of anarchy, also known as the Circle-A, is composed of an “A” and an “O”. The “A” stands for “anarchy”, which means “without rulers”. The “O” represents “order”. Together, they convey the phrase “Anarchy is the mother of Order“, which is a part of a quote attributed to Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, a French philosopher and one of the first self-proclaimed anarchists12.

This symbol is said to represent a French anarchist’s maxim “Anarchy is Order“. It implies that society seeks order, but without the imposition of authority or rulers3.

It’s important to note that anarchism doesn’t signify chaos in all its aspects. Rather, it advocates for a society based on voluntary cooperation of individuals4.

While the anarchy symbol has been associated with various movements and ideas over time, it fundamentally remains a representation of a society seeking order through non-hierarchical and voluntary associations5.

Sources:

Footnotes

  1. Rival LA
  2. Quora
  3. Public Intelligence
  4. Reddit Anarchy 101
  5. Symbols

There isn’t a universally recognized symbol for hierarchy that contrasts directly with the anarchy symbol. In contrast, hierarchy often manifests in symbols of structures or pyramids, representing rigid levels of authority or power, often imposed.

I propose that Roerich’s Banner of Peace be adopted as a universal symbol of hierarchy. The streams of Light and Love converging into the One (Power) on the Path of Return, restoring the Plan on Earth.

JB

Hierarchy is not coercion, it is the law of the Universe. It is not a threat, but the call of the heart and a fiery admonition directing toward the General Good.

Thus let us cognize the Hierarchy of Light.

https://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Hierarchy.php

The Three Fundamentals

The First Cause may be construed to comprise three fundamentals: Omnipotent Good, Omniscient Beautiful, and Omnipresent Creative Sound of Light.

These three fundamentals manifest in varying degrees in different philosophies and religions. For example, in Hinduism, the Trimurti consists of three deities: Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, representing creation, preservation, and destruction, respectively. In Christianity, the Holy Trinity comprises the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Three great energies are focused in Shamballa, the seat of fire:

  • The Energy of Purification: This is the power, innate in the manifested universe, which gradually and steadily adapts the substance aspect to the spiritual. It involves the elimination of all that hinders the nature of divinity from full expression.
  • The Energy of Destruction: This is a destruction which removes or changes the forms which imprison the inner spiritual life, and hide the inner soul light.
  • The Energy of Organization: This is the energy which started the impulse which produced manifestation. The relation of spirit and matter cyclically and under law creates the manifested world as a field for soul development and as an area wherein divine purpose is wrought out through the medium of the Plan.

The Shamballa force therefore focusses the will-to-good, leading to right human relationship, and establishing peace on Earth.

The Shamballa Force • Lucis Trust

Let LIGHT and LOVE and POWER restore the Plan on Earth.



Cruelty in Gaza

Why Fear AI When Human Cruelty Knows No Bounds?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a subject of fear and concern, particularly its potential misuse leading to catastrophic events such as the extinction of humanity. However, when we examine the horrors of the current war in Gaza, we must ask ourselves: should we be more afraid of AI or of the inherent cruelty of twisted human minds?

Israel military says 2 civilians killed for every Hamas militant is a ‘tremendously positive’ ratio given combat challenges.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/05/middleeast/israel-hamas-military-civilian-ratio-killed-intl-hnk/index.html

The UNESCO Constitution states, “Since wars begin in the minds of men and women, it is in the minds of men and women that the defenses of peace must be constructed” [1]. This profound statement underscores the fact that the root of conflict lies not in technology, but in human attitudes and behaviors.

The ongoing war in Gaza, marked by shocking atrocities, serves as a grim testament to this reality. The initial terrorist attack on October 7, followed by the subsequent disproportionate response by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), has resulted in a devastating cycle of violence and human suffering [2]. Yet, it is not AI that initiated this conflict, but rather, decisions and actions resulting from the misuse of the human will.

History bears witness to numerous genocidal wars where AI was not involved. The Rwandan Genocide of 1994, the Bosnian War from 1992 to 1995, and more recently, the Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar are stark reminders of the scale of atrocities that can be perpetrated solely by human hands [3][4][5].

In this light, the fear of AI — the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to reason and act like humans — might be somewhat misplaced. AI is a tool, as beneficial or destructive as the intentions of those who wield it. The true danger lies in AI’s potential to amplify malevolent intentions. Ultimately, it is the misuse of human will that lies at the core of the issue.

This leads us to an important question: how can human will — individual and national — be aligned with the common good without infringing upon free will, and the right for self-defense? This is a critical test for democracy. Democracies thrive on the principle of individual freedom, yet they also necessitate a collective agreement on what constitutes the responsible use of such freedom by promoting right human relations leading to lasting peace.

From the center where the Will of God is known
Let purpose guide the little wills of men –
The purpose which the Masters know and serve.

From the center which we call the race of men
Let the Plan of Love and Light work out
And may it seal the door where evil dwells.

https://www.lucistrust.org/the_great_invocation

Therefore, while it is prudent to be cautious about the potential misuse of AI, it is even more important to recognize that the root of most atrocities lies in human cruelty, not in technology. Instead of fearing AI, perhaps our efforts would be better directed towards fostering empathy, understanding, and peace within the minds of men and women.

[1] “UNESCO Constitution.” UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/about-us/introducing-unesco [2] “Gaza conflict: What happened in the most recent clash?” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-57053074 [3] “Rwanda: How the genocide happened.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13431486 [4] “Bosnian Genocide.” History. https://www.history.com/topics/1990s/bosnian-genocide [5] “Myanmar Rohingya: What you need to know about the crisis.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41566561


On cruelty

Cruelty can be defined as the deliberate infliction of physical or psychological pain, suffering, or harm upon others. It involves acts that are intentionally malicious, inhumane, or lacking compassion. While there may be varying degrees and manifestations of cruelty, it is generally considered a deeply debasing and morally reprehensible act.

More than 18,700 Palestinians have been killed, with 70% of them women and children, according to the territory’s health officials. The vast majority of its 2.2 million people are displaced, and an estimated half face starvation amid an unfolding humanitarian crisis.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live-blog/israel-hamas-war-live-updates-rcna130070

Human cruelty encompasses a wide range of actions, from individual acts of violence to systemic oppression and large-scale atrocities. Examples include physical abuse, torture, discrimination based on race or ethnicity, genocide, war crimes, and other forms of violence or mistreatment inflicted upon fellow human beings.

A supervisor with the Israeli search and recovery team in charge of collecting the bodies showed CBS News some of the injuries he saw and documented, including women whose bodies had lacerations, stabbings and gunshots to their genital area.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hamas-israel-witnesses-evidence-show-sexual-violence-oct-7-terror-attack/

The debasing nature of human cruelty stems from its disregard for the inherent dignity and worth of individuals, as well as the violation of fundamental ethical principles such as empathy, compassion, and respect for others. It represents a betrayal of our collective humanity and undermines the potential for harmonious coexistence and progress in society.

While human cruelty is undoubtedly a deeply troubling aspect of our existence, it is important to remember that there are also countless acts of kindness, compassion, and empathy that demonstrate the best of humanity. By striving to cultivate these positive qualities and promoting empathy, understanding, and justice, we can work towards countering the debasing effects of cruelty and fostering a more compassionate world.



Biden Administration Staffers Demand Gaza Ceasefire In Demonstration Outside Of White House

A test for the United States

More Americans support Israelis than support Palestinians.
This finding holds across polls. When a Marist poll (conducted for NPR and PBS) asked people which side they sympathized with more, 61 percent chose Israelis and 30 percent chose Palestinians. When YouGov (in a poll for The Economist) asked a similar question with a third option — “about equal” — the results also favored Israelis:

David Leonhardt NYT

WHY?

The Occupation of the American Mind

Over the past few years, Israel’s ongoing military occupation of Palestinian territory and repeated invasions of the Gaza strip have triggered a fierce backlash against Israeli policies virtually everywhere in the world — except the United States. The Occupation of the American Mind takes an eye-opening look at this critical exception, zeroing in on pro-Israel public relations efforts within the U.S.

Narrated by Roger Waters and featuring leading observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and U.S. media culture, the film explores how the Israeli government, the U.S. government, and the pro-Israel lobby have joined forces, often with very different motives, to shape American media coverage of the conflict in Israel’s favor. From the U.S.-based public relations campaigns that emerged in the 1980s to today, the film provides a sweeping analysis of Israel’s decades-long battle for the hearts, minds, and tax dollars of the American people in the face of widening international condemnation of its increasingly right-wing policies.

Narrated by Roger Waters / Featuring Amira Hass, M.J. Rosenberg, Stephen M. Walt, Noam Chomsky, Rula Jebreal, Henry Siegman, Rashid Khalidi, Rami Khouri, Yousef Munayyer, Norman Finkelstein, Max Blumenthal, Phyllis Bennis, Norman Solomon, Mark Crispin Miller, Peter Hart, and Sut Jhally.

The Occupation of the American Mind (original 84-minute version) – YouTube

It was a test for the United States, for it is the American Jews who have created the situation, with relatively little help or endorsement from the Jews of other nations. The United States, urged by expediency, by the financial weight of the Zionists, and by the strategic position of Palestine, have thrown the weight of their influence into the conflict on the side of aggression and of territorial theft. They could have worked for the Principle of Harmony and permitted time and the non-separativeness of the nations to adjust and solve the Jewish problem.

The Rays and the Initiations by Alice A. Bailey (written circa 1948), p. 636


E Pluribus Unum

The Dancing Opposites:

A Statistical Perspective

Understanding complex societal dynamics can be challenging. Complex ideas are often best understood through metaphors, and this is where the world of statistics can lend us a helping hand.

In statistics, we encounter different types of data distributions. Some, like the bimodal distribution, have two distinct peaks, symbolizing two separate groups or opinions. Others, like the standard normal distribution, have a single peak (unimodal distribution), representing unity or consensus within the diversity of the extremes.

Imagine a dance floor where two groups, each moving to their own distinct rhythm, are trying to find a common beat. This scene mirrors a mathematical concept known as a ‘bimodal distribution’ – the graph with two peaks representing two different groups or opinions. Now imagine these groups gradually finding a shared rhythm, moving together around a center until the dance floor pulses with a unified beat. This is akin to a ‘standard normal distribution’ – a graph with one peak indicating a consensus. This dance is similar to the statistical concept of merging two curves into one.

However, transforming a divided society (bimodal curve) into a united one (unimodal curve) isn’t straightforward. Reframing this problem, let’s consider two dancers – labeled Sensitivity and Specificity. Sensitivity would represent the ability to correctly identify truth, while Specificity would signify the capacity to spot falsehood. But they are just labels. Neither really knows what’s really true or false.

In our dance metaphor, these two dancers start on opposite sides of the dance floor (two different peaks). Their dance involves slowly moving towards each other until they share the same spot on the floor, dancing at the same rhythm (one common peak).

E Pluribus Unum.
Although the x-axis shows a constant frame of reference, the center (zero) does actually shift in time, as explained in the text.

This movement signifies societal compromise and dialogue leading to unity. This doesn’t mean that truth and error should be averaged, thus compromising truth. It means that our understanding of truth and error — of good and evil — is always relative to our frame of reference. It is this frame of reference that must find a common ground of ever evolving factual truths, as earlier apparently all-inclusive facts are realized to be but minor aspects of still greater facts.

In real-world terms, Sensitivity and Specificity represent two opposing viewpoints in society. As they move towards a common ground — from what appears to be true and from what appears to be false — they symbolize societal integration. But getting there requires each side to make concessions, to change their steps to meet in the middle, dispassionate detachment from the outer disguises of good and evil, through dialogue, compromise, and the finding of common ground of factual truths.

The key to a successful dance, then, is to move from emotionally-driven positions towards a rational consensus. This shift is like turning down the volume on our emotional reactions to focus on the music’s beat – objective facts and mutually beneficial solutions. It’s about finding that common rhythm that allows the actors to reset to a new frame of reference and share the dance floor harmoniously.

However, it’s essential to remember that our dance metaphor, like all metaphors, is a simplification. Real-world societal dynamics are far more complex, influenced by factors such as power imbalances, systemic biases, and deeply ingrained beliefs. These can throw off the rhythm of our dance, making the path to unity more challenging.

The idea of transforming a bimodal curve into a standard normal curve offers a compelling visualization of societal reconciliation. It reminds us of the importance of dialogue, compromise, and above all, the need for “right human relations based on goodwill.” Right means just.

While statistics can’t capture every nuance of societal dynamics, it provides us with a conceptual framework to better understand our complex world. The transformation from a bimodal curve to a bell-shaped normal curve offers a compelling visualization of societal reconciliation. This dance metaphor may not be perfect, but it gives us a starting point to talk about, and work towards, societal unity.


Post Script

A consensus, unimodal curve does not necessarily imply “regression to the mean.” Progression to new means is not only possible but necessary for a democracy to thrive. However, this new rhythm can be achieved by rational consensus of a common vision (new centers) rather than by divisive emotions of competing selfish interests (old extremes).

We may transform our current bimodal political spectrum into a normal (bell-shaped) curve progressively centered around a positive trend of unbiased means aiming at more inclusive expressions of the common good. The extremes may serve the good purpose of pulling the center without breaking cohesion. Unity does not mean uniformity. However, the center must speak up to better balance the usually more vocal extremes.

The best of the past must be preserved as we embrace the future. Only a healthy, resilient center can accomplish such balance between conservative and progressive values, as we progress and realize that earlier apparently all-inclusive facts are but minor aspects of still greater facts. The greater does not nullify the minor, but enhances it, as is always the case in a hierarchical democracy.


Original 2023.11.28 version. This essay will be under constant revision as the metaphor is revised to make it consistent with the statistical theory of binary classifiers.

2023.11.29: A simpler, and probably more elegant solution, amenable to more flexible interpretations, without compromising statistical principles, would be mixing harmonics so that a normal curve would result, such as:

The bimodal third harmonic transformed into an unimodal normal curve by either its mirror image, shifting its phase angle by 1.5, and mixing with the amplitude of the first harmonic. Only half of the complete first harmonic cycle is shown.

A general model, with a mirror image of the second half of a complete first harmonic cycle.

A political weather advisory

Spiritual energies conveying the will-to-synthesis and the will-to-power have been directly impacting post-Atlantean humanity on the first quarter of each century since 1825. Both higher and lower expressions of these impacts are to be expected, as energies are impersonal. It’s up to humanity to choose how to use them.

During the 19th century, several notable initiatives emerged as remarkable demonstrations of the human will-to-synthesis. The Concert of Europe, established after the Napoleonic Wars, aimed to foster stability and cooperation among nations. The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement emerged as a humanitarian force, providing aid and support to those in need. In 1889, the Inter-Parliamentary Union was founded, promoting dialogue and collaboration among parliamentarians worldwide. Additionally, the World Trade Organization facilitated international trade through its efforts.

However, not all expressions of these spiritual energies were positive. The widespread colonial expansion by European powers, fueled by the desire for power and resources, resulted in numerous negative consequences. This included conflicts in the Middle East and other regions, illustrating the complex interplay between higher expressions of will-to-synthesis and the will-to-power, and the potential for negative outcomes when driven by self-interest and domination.

In the 20th century, specifically in 1925, the impact of these energies had far-reaching consequences. It not only marked the rise of Fascism, a political ideology that emphasized authoritarianism and nationalism, but also witnessed the establishment of the United Nations, a global organization aimed at promoting international cooperation and preventing future conflicts. These events exemplified both the lower and higher expressions of the same energies, albeit with a heightened intensity that shaped the course of history.

As we approach the year 2025, there is a growing recognition of the higher expressions of the will-to-good, rooted in the concept of world goodwill among individuals who genuinely seek positive change globally. However, it is disconcerting to observe that fascist ideologies are gaining momentum across the world. From the alarming resurgence of far-right parties in Europe to the troubling spread of white nationalism in the United States, these trends pose significant threats to our collective well-being. This post aims to shed light on the risk identified by The Economist as “the biggest danger to the world in 2024,” urging us to critically evaluate and address these concerning developments.

In the 38 years since the predictive guide was first published, “no single person has ever eclipsed our analysis as much as Donald Trump eclipses 2024,” the article begins. It goes on to ponder what a Trump victory would mean for the world and claims that parliaments and boardrooms the world over are filled with “despair” at what may come:

A second Trump term would be a watershed in a way the first was not. Victory would confirm his most destructive instincts about power. His plans would encounter less resistance. And because America will have voted him in while knowing the worst, its moral authority would decline. The election will be decided by tens of thousands of voters in just a handful of states. In 2024 the fate of the world will depend on their ballots.

Trump would move his MAGA Republican allies into “the most important positions” in government, the article predicts, and Trump would be “unbound in his pursuit of retribution, economic protectionism and theatrically extravagant deals.”

https://www.redlakenationnews.com/story/2023/11/20/politics/the-economists-world-ahead-guide-declares-donald-trump-the-biggest-global-threat-in-2024/118378.html

Fascism

1. Definition and Classification

Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian political ideology that centralizes power, suppresses opposition, and strives for a dictatorial government led by a single leader. It often utilizes a powerful nationalism narrative, advocating for ethnic purity and the suppression of political dissent1.

There are different types of fascism that have been identified over the years. The two primary forms are Italian Fascism, led by Benito Mussolini, and German National Socialism (Nazism), led by Adolf Hitler. Other variations include Spanish Falangism, Brazilian Integralism, and Japanese Statism2. Each of these types shares common elements but also has unique characteristics defined by their cultural and historical contexts.

2. History and Cycles

Fascism first emerged in Italy following World War I, amidst social unrest and fears of communist revolution. Mussolini capitalized on this turmoil, establishing the first fascist regime in 19223. Similarly, in Germany, Hitler rose to power in the wake of economic instability and national humiliation after the Treaty of Versailles.

Fascism tends to emerge in cycles, typically during periods of intense social, economic, or political upheaval. It often exploits societal fears and uses propaganda to gain support, promising stability and order while blaming societal ills on marginalized groups4.

3. Social Determinants and Predictors

Several social factors can predict the rise of fascism. These include economic instability, political polarization, societal unrest, and perceived threats to national identity5. Additionally, the presence of charismatic leaders who can manipulate public sentiment and exploit societal fears greatly contributes to the rise of fascist movements.

4. Current Trends

Currently, there’s a growing concern about the resurgence of neo-fascist ideologies around the world. From the rise of far-right parties in Europe to the spread of white nationalism in the United States, there’s evidence that fascist ideologies are gaining traction6. However, it’s important to distinguish between far-right populism and fascism, as the latter involves a total rejection of democratic principles and institutions.

5. Contrast with Authoritarianism, Monarchical Rule, and Populism

While all these ideologies share a centralization of power, they differ significantly. Authoritarianism is a broad term for any political system where power is concentrated in the hands of a leader or a small elite, but it doesn’t necessarily involve the nationalist and racial elements of fascism7.

Monarchical rule, on the other hand, derives authority from a hereditary line and may or may not be authoritarian. It often lacks the mass mobilization component and the dictatorial aspirations inherent in fascism8.

Populism, meanwhile, is a political approach that seeks to disrupt the existing social order by rallying the common people against elites. While fascism can employ populist rhetoric, it differs in its violent suppression of dissent, its dictatorial aspirations, and its emphasis on ethnic or racial purity9.

In conclusion, understanding fascism is crucial to safeguarding democratic institutions and values. By recognizing its characteristics and societal predictors, society can better guard against its resurgence.

Footnotes

  1. Stanley, J. (2018). How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. Random House.
  2. Paxton, R. O. (2004). The Anatomy of Fascism. Alfred A. Knopf.
  3. Ebner, M. (2011). Ordinary Violence in Mussolini’s Italy. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Mann, M. (2004). Fascists. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Finchelstein, F. (2017). From Fascism to Populism in History. University of California Press.
  6. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  7. Linz, J. J. (2000). Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  8. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What Is Populism?. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Project 2025

Project 2025 is an initiative by The Heritage Foundation aimed at preparing for a conservative victory through policy, personnel, and training. The project’s goal is to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left by establishing both a governing agenda and the right people to carry it out on Day One of the next conservative administration1.

The project builds on four pillars:

  1. Policy Agenda: This comprehensive guide will offer specific proposals for every major issue facing the country, drawing from the expertise of the entire conservative movement.
  2. Personnel Database: The project aims to identify conservatives from all walks of life across the country to serve in the next conservative administration.
  3. Training: To transform this talent pool into effective conservative administrators, the project will offer workshops, seminars, online videos, and mentorship, led by experts who have served in prior administrations.
  4. 180-Day Playbook: This playbook will outline actions to be taken in the first 180 days of the new administration to bring quick relief to Americans suffering from the Left’s policies1.

The Presidential Transition Project, under the umbrella of Project 2025, has been making significant strides, with recent announcements of additions to the Presidential Administration Academy, reaching 75 coalition partners, and continuing development in preparation for the next Conservative President1.

Footnotes

  1. Project 2025 2 3

Project 2025 Key Objectives

Project 2025, an initiative by The Heritage Foundation, aims to prepare for a conservative victory through policy, personnel, and training. It has several key objectives that include restoring integrity, uprooting bureaucracy, and prioritizing the fossil fuel industry12.

  1. Restoring Integrity: Project 2025 aims to restore integrity by ensuring that taxpayer money is used efficiently and effectively. For instance, one of its plans includes ceasing public funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which they argue will lead to conservative taxpayers not subsidizing what they perceive as a left-leaning organization3.
  2. Uprooting Bureaucracy: To counter bureaucratic inefficiencies, Project 2025 is working on a plan to recruit tens of thousands of conservatives to replace existing federal civil service workers2. It believes that such a move will streamline operations and reduce unnecessary bureaucratic procedures4.
  3. Prioritizing the Fossil Fuel Industry: The project seeks to prioritize the fossil fuel industry over clean energy alternatives. This includes proposals to bar funding for the UN’s Green Climate Fund and radically boost fossil fuel consumption56. However, this aspect of the agenda has faced criticism, with opponents arguing that it neglects environmental concerns and the need for sustainable, clean energy solutions78.

It’s important to note that these plans have faced opposition, particularly in relation to prioritizing the fossil fuel industry over clean energy. Some polls indicate that voters reject this aspect of the Project 2025 plan in favor of President Biden’s clean energy plan7.

Footnotes

  1. Project 2025
  2. Wikipedia 2
  3. Heritage
  4. Project 2025 Mandate For Leadership
  5. The Guardian
  6. People’s World
  7. Climate Power 2
  8. Data for Progress

The “Restoring Integrity” aspect of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 aims to ensure accountability and justice within the U.S. government, including within the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)12.

  1. Department of Justice: The project proposes to restore the integrity of the DOJ by ensuring consistent litigation1. This could involve implementing more rigorous checks and balances and increasing transparency in the department’s operations. However, the specifics of how these changes would be implemented are not detailed in the available sources.
  2. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI): The Heritage Foundation suggests giving the FBI a “hard reset”1. This could potentially involve restructuring the organization, reducing administrative offices3, and decreasing headquarters staff to improve efficiency and effectiveness. They argue that such changes would help fix perceived issues within the bureau and restore public faith in the institution43.

The project also advocates for the dismantling of what it refers to as “weaponized intelligence agencies”5. It argues that there has been an erosion of constitutional safeguards by U.S. intelligence agencies and seeks to correct this.

However, it’s important to note that these proposals have been met with criticism. Opponents argue that the project could potentially undermine established institutions and policies6. These perspectives represent the views of the Heritage Foundation and its Project 2025, and there are differing viewpoints on these issues.

Footnotes

  1. Heritage.org 2 3
  2. Heritage.org
  3. Heritage.org 2
  4. Heritage.org
  5. Heritage.org
  6. Mother Jones

The “Restoring Integrity” part of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 aims to restore faith in the executive branch of the U.S. government by ensuring that it functions based on conservative principles and values12. The project argues that this can be achieved by putting the right people in the right roles34.

However, some critics have raised concerns that this could potentially lead to an overpowering Executive branch, thereby upsetting the balance of power among the three constitutional branches of government – Executive, Legislative, and Judicial5. This concern stems from the belief that if one political ideology dominates the executive branch, it could potentially dictate policy and exert undue influence over the other branches6.

In a worst-case scenario, critics worry that if the checks and balances system were to fail, there could potentially be a shift towards an authoritarian regime, where power is concentrated in the executive branch7. This would be a significant departure from the democratic principles upon which the U.S. government is founded, including the separation of powers and checks and balances.

It’s important to note that these are potential concerns raised by critics and not stated intentions of the Heritage Foundation or its Project 2025. The foundation asserts its commitment to constitutional principles and the preservation of American liberties12.

Footnotes

  1. Heritage.org 2
  2. Heritage.org 2
  3. Heritage.org
  4. Heritage.org
  5. The Atlantic
  6. The Washington Post
  7. The New York Times

However, history has numerous examples of charismatic leaders who have used the guise of “restoring integrity” to centralize power and establish authoritarian regimes.

  1. Benito Mussolini – Italy: Mussolini, a charismatic leader, came to power in Italy in 1922 with the promise of restoring the country’s political and economic stability1. He gradually dismantled democratic institutions, consolidated power within the executive branch, and established a totalitarian regime12.
  2. Adolf Hitler – Germany: Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany in 1933. He leveraged his charisma and promises of restoring Germany’s integrity after the hardships of World War I and the Treaty of Versailles3. Hitler gradually centralized political and military power, ultimately establishing a totalitarian regime4.
  3. Hugo Chávez – Venezuela: Chávez won the presidential elections in 1998 on the promise of combating corruption and poverty5. His charismatic leadership and popular support allowed him to consolidate power, rewrite the constitution, and reduce the influence of opposition forces6. His government is considered a model of modern authoritarianism7.

These examples illustrate how charismatic leaders can use the idea of “restoring integrity” to win public support, consolidate power, and establish authoritarian regimes. Although these historical examples do not necessarily predict future events, they should serve as warning signals of potential danger. Not all tropical depressions become category 5 hurricanes, but they should be closely monitored.

Footnotes

  1. Britannica 2
  2. History.com
  3. Britannica
  4. History.com
  5. Britannica
  6. BBC
  7. Freedom House

There is only one way in which this focused evil will which is responsive to the Shamballa force can be overcome, and that is by the opposition of an equally focused spiritual Will, displayed by responsive men and women of goodwill who can train themselves to be sensitive to this type of new incoming energy and can learn how to invoke and evoke it.

You can consequently see why there was more than the casual use of a current word in my mind when I talked to all of you in terms of goodwill and of the will-to-good. All the time I had in my thoughts not just kindness and good intention, but the focused will-to-good which can and must evoke the Shamballa energy, and use it for the arresting of the forces of evil. -Source: The Externalisation of the Hierarchy (quoted text written in April, 1942)

cited in https://hierarchicaldemocracy.wordpress.com/2023/11/17/goodwill-in-times-of-war/

Rachel Maddow’s Prequel traces the rise of a radical strain of authoritarianism that has been alive and well in America for the better part of a century. Taking readers back to the early days of World War II, Maddow, with her inimitable wit and humor, introduces us to a clandestine network of far-far-right American radicals, united by one goal: to overthrow the U.S. government and install authoritarian rule. Through a series of sophisticated and shockingly well-funded efforts—including an astonishing amount of support among serving members of Congress—these extremists would bring America into a much closer flirtation with fascism than we want to remember. Through the heroic resistance of journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens, their goal was never achieved…but the seeds of extremism were planted and have reached forward through history into our present. As we navigate through our own disquieting times, Prequel offers a roadmap from U.S. history, marked both with heroics to emulate and traps and pitfalls to avoid.