What is Power?

The Nature of Power in National and World Affairs

Power, at its core, is the ability to influence outcomes—shaping decisions, behaviors, and the systems that govern our world. It operates not only in visible, quantifiable forms, such as political control or military strength, but also through intangible forces like cultural influence and moral authority. To understand the complex dynamics of power in national and global contexts, we can categorize it broadly into Tangible (Material) Power and Ideational Power, recognizing the interplay between these forces and their mediation by structural systems.

Tangible (Material) Power

Material power consists of visible, concrete resources that shape geopolitics and state influence. These include political authority, financial might, military strength, and, increasingly, technological innovation. Together, these drivers form the basis of hard power—the ability to compel compliance or assert dominance.

Political Power

Political power resides in the machinery of governance and diplomacy, influencing societies within and beyond borders. Institutions like governments, alliances, and international organizations channel this influence. For instance, NATO exemplifies political power’s cooperative potential, coordinating its member states for defense and global stability. Domestically, strong political leadership often determines a nation’s standing on the world stage.

Financial Power

Financial strength, rooted in resources like trade, investment, and economic systems, enables states to project influence without direct coercion. The United States’ control of the global financial system, particularly through the dominance of the dollar, demonstrates how financial power can shape international policy. Similarly, China’s Belt and Road Initiative leverages infrastructure investment to expand its sway across Asia, Africa, and beyond.

Military Power

For centuries, military power has underscored state dominance. Strong armed forces and advanced weaponry deter aggression and enforce political agendas. A modern example is Russia’s annexation of Crimea, which showcased how military might can alter borders. However, in an era of interconnected global systems, excessive reliance on military force often invites counterproductive consequences, such as international sanctions or loss of moral credibility.

Technological Power

Technological advancements now redefine the boundaries of material power. From artificial intelligence to cybersecurity, the ability to innovate and control technological ecosystems has emerged as a decisive factor in global influence. For instance, cyberattacks have become tools of warfare, enabling states to destabilize rivals without direct physical confrontation. Countries with cutting-edge tech industries, like the U.S. and China, are setting new paradigms for global power through competition in AI and quantum computing.

Ideational Power

While material power influences through force or economic leverage, ideational power derives from shared values, principles, and perceptions. This includes moral authority, cultural influence, and intellectual leadership, often referred to collectively as forms of soft power.

Moral Authority

Moral authority stems from adherence to justice, human rights, and ethical leadership. Figures like Nelson Mandela demonstrated how moral authority can galvanize change, even in the absence of material power. On a global scale, institutions like the United Nations derive their legitimacy from their moral mission, advocating for peace, development, and human dignity.

Cultural Influence

Culture shapes perceptions and norms, permeating societies in ways that transcend borders. The export of films, music, education, and values constitutes a profound form of influence. Hollywood’s global dominance, for example, has long bolstered the United States’ soft power by embedding its cultural ideals into foreign societies. Similarly, Japan has leveraged its cultural exports—anime, technology, and cuisine—to elevate its international reputation.

Intellectual Leadership

Thought leadership, rooted in universities, think tanks, and innovation hubs, molds ideologies and policy on a global scale. Nations that nurture intellectual excellence often dominate discourse and decision-making. Countries like Germany, known for technological and environmental advancements, and the U.S., home to many of the world’s leading universities, define how intellectual leadership amplifies a nation’s global standing.

Interactions Between Material and Ideational Power

Power rarely operates in isolation. Instead, its material and ideational dimensions interact, creating feedback loops and dynamic shifts. For example, Ukraine’s resistance to Russian aggression exemplifies the convergence of these forces. While Ukraine leverages Western military and financial assistance (material power), its moral authority and global support stem from the soft power of its struggle for sovereignty and self-determination. Similarly, a nation like South Korea demonstrates ideational power through cultural exports while using technological innovation to strengthen its material power.

Technology often amplifies the connections between these forces. Social media platforms, for instance, propagate ideational messages, enabling leaders and movements to wield soft power on a global scale. Grassroots environmental campaigns highlight how cultural and moral influence challenge traditional material power structures, such as corporations and states denying climate action.

Structural and Systemic Power

Structural power governs how material and ideational forces are distributed and mediated through global systems. Institutions like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and the World Bank shape the operations of power at a systemic level, influencing rules, norms, and resource allocation. For example, sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council represent collective political, military, and moral will, effectively constraining rogue states.

Structural power can also entrench inequalities, as seen in the disproportionate influence of powerful nations in global decision-making. At the same time, these systems offer avenues for smaller states or non-state actors to amplify their voices, as demonstrated by climate accords that give platforms to vulnerable nations.

Challenges and Future Trends in Power

Modern power dynamics are increasingly complex and fluid. Measuring power is difficult because ideational influence, though intangible, can sometimes outweigh material force. Grassroots movements, like Greta Thunberg’s climate activism, show how moral authority and cultural resonance challenge traditional notions of power. Similarly, as technology democratizes access to information, centralized states face challenges from decentralized forces like blockchain or social media-driven activism.

Looking ahead, technological advancement will remain pivotal. The race for AI supremacy or control over resources like rare earth metals will likely shape material power. Conversely, cultural globalization and multipolarity will redefine ideational influence, with emerging nations like India and Brazil gaining prominence on the world stage.

Conclusion

Power is a multifaceted phenomenon, encompassing both tangible material resources and intangible ideational forces. Understanding its operation requires exploring how these categories interact and are shaped by global structures. Tangible dimensions like political, financial, military, and technological power are indispensable in enforcing influence, yet often rely on ideational dimensions like moral authority, cultural influence, and intellectual leadership to sustain legitimacy and long-term impact.

To adapt to changing power dynamics, nations and actors must learn to balance hard and soft power, ensuring that material strength aligns with values and principles. Ultimately, the interplay of these forces determines the contours of influence in a world increasingly defined by interdependence, innovation, and the demand for justice.

Purpose in the Use of Power

Power does not operate in a moral vacuum. Its legitimacy and effectiveness are deeply influenced by the purpose — good or bad — for which it is wielded. At its core, power can be directed toward the common good—advancing justice, peace, and equity—or it can be driven by narrow, self-serving interests that prioritize national, corporate, or individual gain at the expense of broader humanity. The purpose behind wielding power significantly influences its ethical implications and the legitimacy of its outcomes.

Power for the Common Good

When power is wielded altruistically, it often seeks to address systemic challenges, improve human well-being, and foster cooperation. One example of such use is the global effort to eradicate diseases through initiatives like the World Health Organization’s campaigns against polio and malaria. Here, financial, political, and technological resources converge with moral authority to achieve a purpose greater than any single nation’s interest.

Similarly, Norway’s leadership in peace negotiations, such as its role in mediating the Oslo Accords, illustrates how diplomatic power can serve the cause of conflict resolution and peacebuilding. Such acts of altruism boost a nation’s or institution’s moral authority, making their influence more enduring and respected across borders.

Selfish & Nationalistic Wielding of Power

Conversely, power is often used to further self-serving or nationalistic goals, sometimes at the expense of global harmony. Corporate lobbying in international policy, for example, highlights how financial and political power can be directed toward maximizing private profits rather than collective benefit. The fossil fuel industry’s influence in slowing climate change legislation demonstrates how self-interested power can perpetuate environmental harm for economic gain.

On a national level, examples abound of power wielded for dominance rather than justice. Colonialism and resource exploitation by imperial powers, like the British extraction of wealth from India, serve as stark reminders of how power driven by selfish purposes can devastate societies and economies. Modern parallels include land grabs and economic coercion through debt-trap diplomacy, where material power is wielded for geopolitical leverage rather than mutual benefit.

Ethical Implications

The purpose behind power shapes its ethical landscape. Power for the common good fosters shared trust and connects material and ideational dimensions in ways that align with global values. Conversely, selfish uses of power unravel cooperation and often lead to resistance or retaliation. For example, the moral authority of the United States as a global leader has been eroded in instances where military interventions—such as the Iraq War—were perceived as aligned more with strategic interests than humanitarian principles.

The ethical implications of purpose are also evident in the perception of soft power. Cultural exports, when seen as tools of domination rather than cultural exchange, can provoke backlash. This is evidenced in the criticism of Western media homogenization, which some argue erodes local traditions and identities.

The Impact of Purpose on Legitimacy and Effectiveness

The purpose behind power strongly influences its legitimacy. Power wielded altruistically garners not only global support but also long-term trust. For instance, institutions like Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) gain their influence not from material resources but from the clear moral purpose of their actions. This inspires collaboration and amplifies the impact of their efforts.

On the other hand, self-serving uses of power often lead to diminished effectiveness over time. Military occupations driven by resource extraction or geopolitical gain frequently face insurgency and instability, as seen in the prolonged conflicts in Afghanistan. Similarly, economic sanctions imposed without moral justification or global consensus can engender resistance from affected nations and weaken multilateral frameworks.

Purpose and the Interplay of Power Dimensions

The purpose behind power links material and ideational elements, shaping their interplay. A nation investing in renewable energy not only leverages material power (technological advancements and economic capital) but also strengthens its ideational influence by aligning with global sustainability goals. Germany’s Energiewende, or energy transition, showcases how purpose can unify tangible and intangible powers to build both credibility and impact.

Conversely, when technological or military power is wielded selfishly (“might makes right”) , the repercussions can undermine soft power. A country pioneering artificial intelligence solely to control or surveil others risks alienating partners and motivating counterbalancing strategies. Purpose, therefore, acts as a guiding force, determining whether power reinforces its own legitimacy or undermines it by eroding trust and cooperation.

In the context of power dynamics, the phrase “might makes right” suggests that those with power or strength can impose their will and determine what is considered right or just, often regardless of ethical considerations. It implies that power itself justifies actions, meaning that those who are stronger or more powerful can dictate terms and outcomes, often sidelining moral or ethical standards. This concept promotes a worldview where force and coercion override justice and fairness.

Shaping Perceptions and Global Outcomes

Purpose is the lens through which the world judges power, influencing global perceptions and outcomes. Nations or organizations that align their power with universally recognized moral values often leave lasting positive legacies. Conversely, the pursuit of power for narrow, self-serving motives risks deteriorating relationships and fostering conflict.

The evolving landscape of international affairs necessitates that power, in all its forms, engages with the pressing questions of purpose. Whether addressing climate change, alleviating inequality, or resolving conflicts, the intent behind power determines not just outcomes but also the survival of trust and cooperation essential in an interdependent world. Power, when wielded wisely and ethically, has the potential to transcend its own definition—becoming a force not just for influence, but for humanity’s collective good.

Israel’s Military Actions in Gaza

Israel’s recent military actions in Gaza offer a stark example of how the use of power can reflect contentious purposes and provoke global debate. These actions have been criticized by various international organizations, governments, and human rights groups for violating international law, such as excessive use of force, targeting civilian infrastructure, and contributing to widespread humanitarian suffering. Such measures raise questions about whether the purpose behind this use of power aligns with ethical principles or instead serves narrower, self-serving goals.

From Israel’s perspective, these actions are often justified through the lens of national security. Its leaders cite the need to neutralize militant threats, protect citizens, and maintain the country’s territorial integrity. Supporters argue that a state has not only the right but the obligation to defend itself, particularly in the face of ongoing rocket attacks and other forms of aggression. This perspective underscores a purpose aimed at ensuring survival and security in a hostile regional environment.

However, the proportionality and intent of these military campaigns is questionable. The actions have exacerbated an already dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza, displaced countless civilians, and undermined prospects for peace by hardening divisions. Violations of international norms—such as the targeting of densely populated areas or restricting essential aid—point to morally-flawed political or ideological goals driving these operations, such as consolidating control or undermining Palestinian autonomy, rather than fostering long-term security or coexistence. This casts doubt on whether the purpose aligns with principles of justice, equity, and global responsibility.

This situation underscores the broader interplay between power, purpose, and perception. For power to maintain global credibility, its application must not only achieve its objectives but also reflect a purpose that others deem just. Otherwise, it risks alienating allies, damaging reputations, and perpetuating cycles of conflict, thus failing to secure any sustainable, meaningful resolution.

Political Power and Physics

Political power and physical power share foundational parallels—similar in structure, yet distinct in their execution. The physics definition of power as energy over time offers a metaphorical lens to interpret the nature and dynamics of power in politics. Each term within this definition carries weight when applied to political contexts, illuminating the intricacies of influence, capacity, and effect.

Energy as Capacity to Do Work
In physics, energy represents the potential to create change, achieved through work. Politically, energy can be seen as the resources, strategies, and will a leader or entity possesses. A government with vast economic leverage or widespread public support holds significant political “energy.” Yet, this energy (capital) must be effectively applied to execute meaningful change; unutilized energy in physics, like unrealized potential in politics, yields no movement.

Work as Force x Displacement
Work in physics results from applying force to move something across a distance. Similarly, political power becomes tangible when force—whether ideological, diplomatic, economic, or military—is applied to create movement or societal change. The measure of successful political work could be seen in how far these efforts shake the status quo. For example, enacting legislation, securing rights, or resolving international conflicts reflect deliberate force reshaping entrenched systems. The greater the resistance (opposing force), the more power is required for significant motion.

Power as Energy Over Time
Physics defines power as the rate at which energy is expended to perform work, measured over time. Politically, this equates to the sustainability and intensity of influence. A fleeting, explosive exertion of power—a coup, a revolution, or a single military strike—may effect immediate change but often dissipates like a burst of kinetic energy, leaving instability or devastation. On the other hand, enduring political power is more akin to a steady stream of energy, enabling deliberate, constructive work over time. Leaders and nations that persistently apply their energy toward progress—balancing consistency with foresight—tend to achieve lasting impacts.

The Ethical Implications of Power Application
Metaphorically, how energy is directed and how efficiently work is performed reflect the purpose behind wielding power. A system operating solely on brute force neglects efficiency and often leads to excessive “energy loss,” just as selfish or short-sighted political power yields destruction without progress. Conversely, strategic, purposeful power maximizes the achieved changed relative to effort, producing results that benefit not just immediate stakeholders but the broader system.

Take, for example, Israel’s military actions in Gaza. Here, force may have pushed conflict away momentarily, but if the applied work doesn’t shift the larger dynamics toward peace or justice, the energy spent can seem wasteful or misdirected. On the other hand, altruistic energy, when applied toward humanitarian aid or diplomacy, impacts suffering to foster unity—a measured and enduring form of power.

Extending the Metaphor
The interplay between force and displacement also echoes global perceptions of power. Nations or leaders may exert great energy, but if their actions cause minimal change—moving neither conflict toward resolution nor society toward betterment—then the work performed appears inefficient. Alternatively, smaller, well-directed forces can yield profound results, much like a lever amplifies mechanical advantage.

Lastly, energy in physics can take many forms—potential, kinetic, thermal. Politically, power too manifests in multiple facets, from military might (kinetic energy) to diplomatic alliances (potential energy), and even “soft” influences like culture or social media (thermal energy spreading through a system). Each form requires careful management to ensure it furthers ethical and long-term goals, preventing dissipation into destructive or stagnant cycles.

By translating these physical concepts into political realities, we gain a more precise framework to scrutinize the exertion of power. Like energy, power’s value lies not in its existence but in its application—measured by the purpose it serves and the change it achieves.

Let Light and Love and POWER
restore the Plan on Earth

Spiritual Resistance

Five Affirmations

Spiritual resistance does not resist evil, it closes the door where evil dwells.
Spiritual resistance does not engage evil in its own plane; it takes the higher ground, uplifting the adversary.
Spiritual resistance redirects the vectors of force of their adversary to the common good.
Truth does not resist evil; its light dissolve darkness.
Truth is. Evil is not.

So, when the adversary proclaims a post-truth world, spiritually resist evil affirming: not true!

Anger, hatred and their old ways: NOT TRUE!

From the center which we call the human race
Let the Plan of Love and Light work out
And may it seal the door where evil dwells.

Spiritual resistance is a practice of profound strength and clarity—not by fighting darkness, but by extinguishing its hold. It is not a clash of opposites, but a higher mode of engagement, one that transforms, uplifts, and reclaims the truth.

Closing the Door to Evil

Evil is powerless without a threshold to enter, so spiritual resistance begins by closing the door where it seeks to dwell. This is not a struggle; it is a refusal to give space to malice, deception, or hatred. Resisting evil in this way is not about conflict, but about leaving it no room to breathe.

Taking the Higher Ground

To meet evil on its own plane is to be ensnared by its terms. Spiritual resistance takes the higher ground, not engaging in battle but offering elevation. When faced with harm, it refuses to descend. Instead, it seeks to uplift—even the adversary—toward a condition of understanding and grace. This is not surrender; it is transcendence.

Transforming Forces

Spiritual resistance transforms. Rather than pushing back with equal force, it absorbs and redirects the energy of opposition toward the common good. Like an alchemist turning lead into gold, it transmutes negativity into something that serves higher purposes, altering the very fabric of conflict into cooperation.

The Light of Truth

Truth does not need to resist evil. Truth exists as light exists—when it shines, darkness vanishes. The presence of truth dissolves deception without brute effort. It is not a fight; it is a revelation.

The Paradox

Truth is. Evil is not. Evil persists only in the absence of truth; it is an illusion sustained by the shadows of ignorance or fear. To give it undue attention is to lend it credibility. But when truth asserts itself, the illusion disappears.

Resistance to Post-Truth

When faced with claims of a “post-truth” world, spiritual resistance does not argue; it simply proclaims, “Not true.” Lies gain their power from the energy we feed them. To declare the truth is to starve falsehood of its influence.

Affirming Truth

Anger, hatred, vengeance—these are tools of the old, broken cycle. They declare themselves loudly, but they are not true. To resist them spiritually is not to meet them with opposition, but to strip them of authority by naming their deception. We assert their irrelevance, saying with clarity and strength, “Not true.”

Living in the Light

Spiritual resistance is the act of refusing the shadows and living in the light. It relies not on force, but on the quiet, unshakable power of what is real and good. By closing the door to evil, uplifting those around us, and proclaiming truth, we dissolve the false and create space for a higher reality. To resist spiritually is, ultimately, to lead with love.

A Master Speaks on Non-Resistance to Evil

Your major job at this time is not to wrestle with the powers of evil and the forces of darkness, but to awaken an interest in and mobilise the forces of light and the resources of men of good will, and of right inclination in the world today. Resist not evil, but so organise and mobilise the good, and so strengthen the hands of the workers on the side of righteousness and love, that evil will find less opportunity.

-Esoteric Psychology Vol. 1, p. 691.

***

[Written during World War II] At this point I would like to pause for a moment and interpolate a word in answer to a perfectly normal question which is liable to arise in the minds of thinking students and aspirants today. Of what use is all this abstruse and abstract information to a world in agony and a world distressed? The major usefulness of this imparted information … lies far ahead in the period after the war when again the field of world service opens and men have time for thought and due reflection. World service is going on now perhaps in greater volume than ever before but it is restricted to the field of releasing from slavery and alleviation of pain [Page 443] and suffering, and, therefore, to the more strictly physical forms of help. The service to which I here refer is that educational process which will produce the coming civilisation and its attendant culture. This will be based on all the cultural processes of the past and of the present, but will discard all that has produced the disasters of today, as far as may be possible. That means a gradual future usefulness for the knowledge of the underlying potencies, for they can indicate the lines of least resistance to the emerging good and the developing crises which inevitably lie ahead in the period of reconstruction. But one potent good can emerge even at this time from a study of these matters, provided the student of esotericism rests not content with study (using it as an escape from the disastrous present) but parallels his understanding of the causes and conditions by a strenuous effort to be of aid in a practical and a definitely physical sense.

This is the dominant emerging fact to which all that I have said bears testimony: world conditions today—precipitated as they are by human greed and ignorance—are nevertheless basically conditioned by the will-to-good which is the primary quality of the energies and forces coming forth from the great Lives in which all that exist live and move and have their being. The Law of the Universe (and what is law but the working out of the purposes of these all-embracing Lives, of Their impulses and Their plans?) is to all eternity the good of the whole and naught can arrest this happening; for who can arrest the impact of these energies which play upon and through our planet. When I say this, I would at the same time point out that the attitude of many students, inevitably participants in world events, that “such is the Law and such is the Karma of people and nations and such is the pre-determined destiny” [Page 444] is far from right. They believe—sometimes sincerely—that all that should be done is simply to wait for results to appear and for karma and destiny to fulfil itself. Then and not till then, all will be well. But they forget that karma fulfils itself in relation to the form nature upon which it expends its energy and that where there is a static condition and a quiescent attitude, the process moves but slowly; the life then within the form fails to experience the needed, forceful awakening; inevitably then there lies ahead a repetition of the process until the time comes when activity and response is evoked. This then leads to resistance to the apparent karmic necessity and this brings about liberation. Only through resistance to evil (and in this world period and in this kali-yuga, as the Eastern teachers call it, it is an essential basic attitude) can karma be brought to an end. The law of matter still governs in the three worlds of human experience and “fire by friction” must burn up that which veils the steadily increasing brilliance of solar fire. It is the recognition of “solar fire”—as it shows itself in a transcendental idealism and radiance—by the unintelligent idealist, and his simultaneous refusal to cooperate in this period of karmic necessity, that is prolonging the difficult and cruel situation and leading him individually to sink deep into glamour. The simplification of the world’s problem in terms of matter comes through a recognition of the essential dualism underlying events. I commend this thought to all students, suggesting that they base optimism on the long range vision, endorsed by the Heavens and corroborated by the activity of the stars, and thus feel sure of the ending of this immediate tragic situation.

-The Tibetan Master in the book Esoteric Astrology published by the Lucis Trust

Let Light and Love and POWER
restore the Plan on Earth!

Wisdom in Times of Chaos

Chaos, in scientific terms, refers to systems that appear disordered but are actually governed by underlying patterns and deterministic laws. Chaotic systems follow precise rules, but their outcomes are so sensitive to initial conditions that they seem unpredictable. Small changes can lead to vastly different outcomes. This is often referred to as the “butterfly effect.” This deterministic yet unpredictable behavior is what distinguishes chaos from randomness.

The paradox of deterministic yet unpredictable systems in chaos theory can be likened to the philosophical and theological debate about God’s Plan and human free will. In this analogy:

God’s Plan: This can be seen as the deterministic aspect, suggesting that there is an overarching order or purpose guiding the universe. Just as chaotic systems follow specific rules, the idea of a divine plan implies a structured path or destiny.
Human Free Will: This represents the unpredictable element, where individual choices and actions introduce variability and complexity into the unfolding of events. Like the sensitivity to initial conditions in chaos theory, human decisions can lead to a wide range of outcomes, making the future seem unpredictable.

Mathematically, chaos is often described using nonlinear dynamical systems. One of the most famous mathematical formulations is the Lorenz attractor, which is a set of differential equations that model atmospheric convection. The Lorenz attractor demonstrates how deterministic equations can produce complex, seemingly random behavior.

Overall, chaos theory provides a framework for understanding how complex and unpredictable behaviors can arise from simple deterministic rules, highlighting the hidden order within chaotic processes. Furthermore, the coexistence of structure and freedom suggests that while there is a grand design, the path to its realization is shaped by countless individual actions and choices. It reflects the intricate balance between order and chaos, where both deterministic laws and free will play crucial roles in shaping reality.

Wisdom in Times of Chaos

Chaos. The word itself stirs an unsettling mix of fear and anticipation. We see it in the tumult of politics, the rising tide of environmental crises, and the fractures in our social fabric. But could this chaos hold within it a deeper purpose? Could it be a distorted reflection, symbolizing not only the breakdown of old paradigms but also the divine possibilities waiting to emerge from the soul of humanity? If we can look beyond the surface, we may glimpse the profound wisdom hidden in what feels like disorder.

The Body Politic and the Soul of Nations

The chaos gripping the world’s nations is not arbitrary. It is the visible symptom of an invisible cause, a distortion of the divine possibilities that rest within the soul of humanity itself. Every nation, like every individual, has a soul—a reservoir of potential tied to its highest purpose. Yet, when disconnected from this higher vision, the body politic succumbs to fear, greed, and self-interest. We find ourselves locked in cycles of polarization and stagnation. But chaos, unsettling as it is, serves as a wake-up call, pressing us to realign with the soul’s deeper yearnings for justice, unity, and truth.

A Higher Plan, a Greater Purpose

History is not random. It unfolds according to a Plan—a blueprint for humanity guided by a Higher Intelligence that many call God. This is not a distant deity issuing decrees, nor is it an institution confined to scriptures or rituals. Instead, it is the essence of Truth, permeating every aspect of existence, calling us toward our collective evolution, as humanity exerts its freewill.

Reintroducing God—not the Bible, but the experiential understanding of a Higher Intelligence—into classrooms is vital. Education has for too long focused solely on the material and the measurable, neglecting the wisdom necessary to cultivate the soul. God, as love, reason, and purpose, must return to the center of how we teach if we are to guide the next generation toward creating a harmonious and meaningful world.

The Purpose of Crises

Crises—as painful as they are—serve a purpose. They are the refining flames in which the soul’s potential is forged. They shake the foundations of what no longer serves us, forcing us to confront the consequences of choices made in fear or ignorance. Whether it is political upheaval, economic struggle, or environmental catastrophe, each serves as a doorway. Behind the turmoil lies the opportunity to express the soul’s purpose more clearly and fully.

Chaos as Prelude

Like the labor pains of childbirth, chaos heralds something new. Though it feels overwhelming, it is not the end—it is a transition. The structures we have built, from how we govern to how we consume, are unsustainable. They must collapse to make way for the emergence of new systems, ones that reflect harmony and wisdom rather than exploitation and inequality. This is the brutal, yet beautiful, rhythm of renewal.

The Death of the Old, the Birth of the New

The exploitation of Earth’s resources, the hoarding of wealth, and the indifference to suffering—all these patterns must die. The current way of being is incompatible with the Plan for the Good, the True, and the Beautiful. A healthier order is possible, but it requires transformation. This means letting go of selfish paradigms and adopting practices aligned with deeper truths. It means moving away from an economy that extracts to one that restores, a society that divides to one that uplifts.

A Life of Wisdom Restored

The rebuilding of the world demands wisdom—a wisdom we have too often discarded. This is wisdom not only in our personal lives but embedded in every domain of human activity. Politics driven by justice and integrity, education rooted in love and inquiry, businesses that prioritize social and environmental impact over profit, art and science that celebrate the mysteries of life, finance that aligns with equity—every sphere has a role in expressing the soul’s highest aspirations.

This restoration of wisdom does not imply a return to idealized versions of the past, but a reawakening of eternal principles adapted to the needs of our time.

Toward a Simple, Harmonious Future

A new world is not only possible; it is necessary. It begins with simplicity—not in material poverty but in abundance of clarity and purpose. It begins with harmony—not in forced uniformity but in the powerful variety that arises when each person, each community, lives in accord with its soul’s truth. Democracy based on merit (meritocracy) and justice, economies that cherish liberty and fairness, and relationships that honor the sacredness of all life—these make up the blueprint of the future.

To live in harmony with Nature and one another is not just a dream; it is the culmination of the Plan. The chaos around us—the suffering and the struggle—is not meant to break us but to prepare us. Beneath the surface of disorder lies the promise of renewal. When wisdom leads, we will find the way.

The Dance of Chaos and Creation

Deep within the fabric of the universe lies a rhythm—wild, unpredictable, and untamed. This is the science of chaos, an intricate dance where the tiniest movement sends ripples cascading through the cosmos. Humanity finds itself part of this great dance, perched on the edge of profound change, with an existential storm swirling around us. To grasp what this means, we must understand chaos not as destruction, but as a crucible for newness—a gateway to complex, emergent realities that reshape the world.

The Butterfly and the Collapse

Chaos theory teaches us the power of small beginnings. The proverbial flap of a butterfly’s wings can stir hurricanes across oceans. Humanity’s existential crisis today feels like we are caught in the hurricane’s eye—a maelstrom of environmental collapse, political fracture, and social disconnection. But chaos does not unfold randomly, nor does it exist in isolation. Every conflict, every wildfire, every displaced community is like a single domino in an interconnected web. What it teaches us is that small acts—whether of neglect or care—can have profound consequences, altering paths we thought immutable. The butterfly that once shook the branches now challenges us to awaken.

Cracks in the Ice

Imagine a frozen lake, still and serene under its glossy surface. But cracks are forming beneath, spiraling and branching with wild precision. Chaos emerges where once there was order, deconstructing the solidity we thought we could trust. Yet in these cracks lies transformation. The ice cannot stay frozen forever; the upheaval is merely the first step into spring’s thaw.

Today, humanity’s ice is cracking. Old structures—be it our reliance on fossil fuels, economic exploitations, or rigid hierarchies—are breaking apart. These fractures terrify us. But as chaos theory reminds us, broken systems don’t vanish into nothingness. Instead, new structures arise—stronger, more adaptive, and sometimes more beautiful. Chaos is messy, yes, but it is a master architect of new order.

Fractals of Interconnectedness

At the heart of chaos theory is the fractal—a pattern repeated endlessly, from the curve of coastline waves to the branching of blood vessels. Life, at every scale, is built on these interconnected truths. Humanity’s crisis is also fractal; global environmental upheavals echo in local droughts, while a single act of injustice reverberates in streets, cities, and nations. The crisis feels overwhelming because of its endless repetition—but it is also the key to its resolution.

Fractals teach us that change in one part of the system ripples through the whole. A single shift—whether a shift in mindset, or new ways of governance—has the potential to resonate through levels of human society. Interconnectedness may amplify chaos, but it also lights the path toward emergence.

Chaos as Midwife

Birth is neither quiet nor orderly. It is raw chaos—contractions and pain, moments of seeming disarray. Yet chaos in birth doesn’t signal despair; quite the opposite. It is the prelude to life itself, to the emergence of something entirely new.

Humanity’s existential crisis feels like labor pains, a burning threshold marked by uncertainty and fear. But chaos, as brutal as it feels, is also the midwife of creation. Just as a forest fire preludes new green shoots, the destruction of current inequalities and exploitations could pave the way for societies anchored in wisdom, harmony, and justice.

Emergent Realities

Emergence is chaos’s gift. From the unsteady noise comes new patterns—like the swirling of galaxies, the veins in a leaf, or even the self-organizing brilliance of ant colonies. These structures are not pre-designed; they are born out of the relationship between seemingly chaotic elements. Humanity today faces such a possibility.

The world that waits beyond this existential upheaval will not be static. It will likely emerge from the relationships we dare to forge during these troubled times. If we lean into cooperation rather than competition, balance rather than exploitation, the shapes of the “new” may astonish us. Complexity thrives when survival depends on unity, and humanity’s path forward might be one that binds ecosystems, economies, and ethics as interconnected parts of a whole.

Order Hiding in Chaos

It is easy to fear chaos, to see it as disorder, the harbinger of endings. But chaos, scientifically and metaphorically, is simply a hidden order. It is the wisdom of the universe reshuffling the deck when old hands no longer suffice. Humanity’s crises today—existential as they are—mirror this truth. They are neither the final collapse nor signs of hopelessness. They are transformations in progress, agents of change breaking through the soil so that something new might take root.

Like a storm clearing the skies for dawn, chaos holds one truth steadfast: in its uncertainty, it carries the seeds of what is yet to become. The patterns of the next reality are waiting to emerge. It is up to us to create them, not by avoiding the storm of chaos, but by walking into it with intention, imagination, and courage.

The Tyranny of the Majority

In the democratic arena, a battle of ideas and ideals unfolds with every election cycle. However, this game is not without its flaws. Misleading slogans and hidden agendas can sway a general election, momentarily overshadowing the common good. Yet, this victory is often short-lived, as the realities and complexities of governance eventually surface. The challenge lies in ensuring that democracy truly reflects the will of “we the people,” not just a transient sentiment or a manipulated majority.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/11/05/us/elections/results-president.html

One of the significant threats to genuine representation is the influence of less informed voters, particularly when their opinions are shaped by powerful super PACs.

Politically disengaged voters are largely credited as a key bloc of Trump’s political support and were found to be critical in his 2016 election win. Trump’s advantage with disengaged voters has persisted, though modestly. Disengaged voters are more likely to believe the country is out of control and on the wrong track. The greatest share of them are most concerned about prices and inflation and they are more likely to think the economy is getting worse than engaged voters are. Disengaged voters also consume different kinds of media than engaged voters do. They are less likely than engaged voters to trust the news media and less likely to consume news from nearly every source.

–Yougov.com

These entities can flood the political landscape with targeted messaging, skewing perceptions and priorities. This manipulation becomes even more problematic when considering that approximately one-third of eligible voters abstain from participating in general elections. Consequently, the outcomes do not fully represent the collective will, undermining the legitimacy of the democratic process.

When a candidate wins the popular vote by a slim margin, such as 50:49, it signals the need for a leadership style grounded in consensus rather than the illusion of a “landslide mandate.” Governing by consensus ensures that policies reflect a broader spectrum of public interest, fostering unity and respect among the populace. It is a humbling reminder that a thin majority is not a carte blanche to impose one-sided agendas.

The true will of “we the people” rests on some factual truths that transcend partisan divides. Americans collectively desire the protection of their children from the horrors of mass school shootings. They value the sanctity of personal privacy, advocating for a government that respects boundaries in reproductive health and religion, upholding the separation of church and state. There is a shared condemnation of bullies and genocides, as humanity’s moral compass aligns against such injustices.

Moreover, “we the people” express caution against extreme “wokism,” particularly in areas like gender and sports, and treatments for gender dysphoria in prepubertal children. There is a consensus that supports science, recognizing the net benefits of vaccines for public health. Environmental stewardship is another pillar of public will, underscoring the importance of clean air and pure water for future generations.

These issues, along with many others, require resolution through consensus, not the tyranny of a thin majority. Democracy thrives when policies are crafted with consideration and compromise, embodying the diverse voices and values of the nation. By prioritizing consensus over division, we can safeguard democracy from the pitfalls of a fleeting majority, ensuring that governance remains a true reflection of the people it serves. In this way, the soul of democracy is preserved, and the dreams of its citizens are honored.

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/2024-election-surveys-show-trump-voters-misinformed-on-major-issues-by-j-bradford-delong-2024-11

In a democracy, both elections and referenda serve crucial but distinct roles in the decision-making process. Elections are expeditious mechanisms to resolve policy disagreements, often swayed by the personalities of candidates, and are decided by a simple majority vote. They are typically utilized to select leaders or make decisions on policies efficiently, allowing the democratic process to address immediate concerns and changes in governance.

On the other hand, referenda represent a more profound, introspective exercise in democratic decision-making. They require a qualified majority, ranging from two-thirds to three-quarters, to pass, underscoring their role in addressing essential matters that touch on the society’s core values. This higher threshold reflects the need for a broader consensus, ensuring that changes to fundamental issues, such as constitutional amendments or deeply impactful societal shifts, resonate with a significant majority of the populace. Referenda necessitate a more thoughtful and deliberate approach, as they aim to capture the collective conscience of the community on issues that define the very soul of a society.

A landslide victory in the popular vote, even if a candidate or policy would receive more than 60% of the vote, is not typically considered a referendum. While both involve voting, they serve different purposes:

Elections: These are used to select representatives or decide on policies. A landslide victory in an election would indicate strong support for a candidate or party but remains within the context of choosing leadership or specific policies.
Referenda: These are specific votes on particular issues or policies, often requiring a direct decision from the electorate. They are usually framed as a yes/no question on a single issue, separate from the broader electoral process.

Thus, while a landslide victory shows significant public support, it doesn’t transform an election into a referendum, as the latter is a distinct process focused on specific issues rather than general electoral outcomes.

Role of Minority

In a democracy, a minority, especially when aligned with the core values of the nation and representing almost half of the electorate, plays a crucial role in shaping the political landscape. This significant minority influences national discourse and policy decisions, ensuring that the diversity of thought and values is woven into the fabric of governance.

Such a minority serves as a vital counterbalance to majority power, acting as a safeguard against the tyranny of the majority. By advocating for their perspectives, they contribute to a more nuanced and comprehensive debate on key issues, encouraging a broader consideration of policies that reflect the nation’s diverse values.

Furthermore, this group has the potential to drive compromise and consensus-building, essential for fostering an inclusive political environment. Their involvement can lead to more robust policy outcomes that accommodate multiple viewpoints, ultimately strengthening the democratic process.

For a democracy to thrive, mechanisms must be in place to ensure that minority voices are heard and respected. This includes fair representation in legislative bodies, platforms for public dialogue, and policies that protect minority rights. By doing so, the democratic system not only respects the principle of majority rule but also upholds the deeper commitment to pluralism and inclusion, echoing the foundational values of the society it serves.

Consensus Rules

Some key rules and principles for seeking consensus in this vital endeavor are:

Inclusivity: It’s crucial to involve a broad spectrum of society in the drafting process. This includes various political, social, and economic groups, ensuring that diverse perspectives are considered. By doing so, the constitution is more likely to gain widespread acceptance and legitimacy.
Transparency: Open and transparent processes help build trust among stakeholders. Clear communication about the goals, processes, and decisions made during drafting allows for public scrutiny and input, fostering a sense of ownership among the populace.
Compromise: Constitutional drafting often involves differing opinions and interests. Successful consensus requires negotiation and compromise, balancing competing demands to forge a document that serves the common good.
Broad Representation: Ensuring that all sectors of society, including marginalized and minority groups, have a voice in the process is essential. This broad representation helps the constitution address the needs and aspirations of the entire nation.

The U.S. Constitution serves as a historical example of consensus-seeking in action. While it established a foundational governance framework, it was initially imperfect, particularly regarding issues such as slavery. This highlights the importance of an evolving consensus. Over time, the U.S. has addressed these imperfections through amendments and ongoing public discourse, striving toward a more inclusive and just society.

Amendments and public dialogue play crucial roles in refining constitutional frameworks. They allow for adaptation to changing societal norms and values, ensuring that the Constitution remains relevant and responsive to the needs of the people. This continuous process of evolution embodies the pursuit of a “more perfect union” and underscores the dynamic nature of effective governance.

American Democracy

The recent presidential election was aptly characterized as an existential crisis, highlighting the urgent need to safeguard democracy against the rising tide of authoritarianism both in the United States and around the globe. However, we must distinguish true democracy from the capitalistic system that is intertwined with the American model of democracy.

Adam Smith is a key figure in the broader philosophical context that supported capitalist ideals during the time of the Founding Fathers. His seminal work, “The Wealth of Nations,” published in 1776, laid the foundation for classical economics and articulated the benefits of free markets, competition, and the division of labor. Smith’s ideas about economic freedom and the “invisible hand” of the market influenced many thinkers and policymakers of the era.

While there are no explicit references to “The Wealth of Nations” in foundational American documents and its influence remains a topic of scholarly debate, the book was known to be read and discussed among intellectual circles in America. Figures like Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were familiar with Smith’s work, and his ideas likely contributed to their economic thinking, shaping the economic landscape of the United States.

Unregulated Capitalism:
A System of Servitude and Environmental Exploitation

Introduction

Raw, unregulated capitalism has long been heralded as the driving force behind economic progress, innovation, and individual freedom. Its roots are deeply embedded in the philosophical ideas of the Enlightenment, particularly those espoused by Adam Smith, who advocated for free markets governed by the “invisible hand.” However, this economic system, in its most unrestrained form, reveals paradoxical outcomes: while promoting individual initiative and entrepreneurship, it simultaneously engenders servitude wherein the poor serve the wealthy, hinders collaboration, and exploits nonrenewable planetary resources, culminating in extensive waste.

Historical Context and Theoretical Perspectives

The emergence of capitalism can be traced back to the late medieval period, gaining momentum during the Industrial Revolution. The theoretical underpinnings of capitalism, as articulated by figures like Smith, emphasized economic freedom and minimal government intervention. However, without regulatory frameworks, capitalism’s unchecked pursuit of profit often results in socioeconomic disparities.

Karl Marx critiqued this system in the 19th century, arguing that capitalism inherently exploits the working class, reducing human labor to a mere commodity. This critique remains relevant today, as the wealth gap continues to widen globally. The rich accrue immense wealth, while the poor struggle to secure basic necessities—a modern-day servitude where laborers toil for subsistence wages to enrich the affluent.

Hindrance to Collaboration and Innovation

While capitalism encourages competition and individual entrepreneurship, it often discourages collaboration, which is crucial for sustainable progress. The intense focus on profit maximization can lead companies to prioritize short-term gains over long-term cooperative ventures or innovations that benefit society at large. This competitive ethos can stifle creativity and hinder the development of collective solutions to global challenges.

The tech industry presents a contemporary example. While it has fostered remarkable innovation, companies often prioritize proprietary technologies and market dominance over collaborative efforts. This results in a fragmented landscape where potential synergies are lost, and innovations are siloed rather than shared for broader societal benefit.

Exploitation of Resources and Environmental Consequences

Raw capitalism’s drive for profit also leads to the rampant exploitation of nonrenewable resources. Historically, industries have prioritized resource extraction with little regard for environmental sustainability, leading to deforestation, mining depletion, and fossil fuel overconsumption. The environmental degradation and climate change consequences of this exploitation are becoming increasingly evident.

The notion of the “tragedy of the commons” aptly describes this phenomenon. In a system where individual entities act in self-interest without regulation, shared resources are depleted rapidly, leading to long-term ecological and economic crises. The waste generated from unsustainable practices further exacerbates these issues, contributing to pollution and habitat destruction.

Proposing Solutions and Alternatives

To mitigate the adverse effects of unregulated capitalism, a reevaluation of economic priorities and the introduction of regulatory frameworks are essential. Governments and international bodies must enforce regulations that promote sustainable practices, equitable wealth distribution, and collaborative innovation. Encouraging business models that balance profit with social responsibility and environmental stewardship can lead to more sustainable outcomes.

Moreover, embracing alternative economic systems that integrate cooperative principles, such as social entrepreneurship and the circular economy, can provide viable solutions. These models prioritize the collective good, resource efficiency, and waste reduction, aligning economic activities with ecological and social imperatives.

Conclusion

Raw, unregulated capitalism, while fostering individual achievement and economic growth, often perpetuates a system of servitude and environmental degradation. The unchecked pursuit of profit leads to socioeconomic inequalities and the unsustainable exploitation of resources. Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort to rethink the principles guiding economic systems, emphasizing collaboration, sustainability, and equity to ensure a more balanced and inclusive future for all.

The MAGA ideology, recently supported by a thin majority of the popular vote (51:49), represents a regression to unregulated free markets. According to the original proponent of the MAGA ideology in the 1980s, “Government is the problem.” Therefore, to achieve the goals of the MAGA movement, it is essential to destroy regulatory agencies — part of the “deep state” — such as the EPA and the FDA. The recent Cabinet appointments by President-elect Trump — like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead new ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ — certainly point in the direction of a regression to unregulated free markets.

A world in which the United States proves itself to be the controlling factor, after wiping out Russia, which she can well do if she acts now [written in 1948]. It will be a predominantly capitalistic world, run by several nations but headed by the United States. A capitalistic nation is not necessarily wrong; capital has its place, and Russia (the enemy of capitalism) is by no means free from capitalistic bias. The motives of the United States are very mixed motives: greed of money or its equivalent, such as oil, and at the same time sincerely good intentions for the establishment of human freedom in a democratic world—modelled, of course, on American democracy. Other motives are an appreciation of the armed fist and, at [Page 639] the same time, a longing for economic sharing and for that essential kindness which is such a strong American characteristic—a mass characteristic. These mixed motives will produce eventually a very confused world, one in which it will be found that humanity has learned very little as the result of the World War (1914-1945) and is acquiescent to the cycle of well-intentioned money control.

–The Tibetan Master in The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, p. 638

Therefore, the MAGA ideology must be resisted as it represents the third and hidden “congenital defect” of the 1776 American Revolution. In addition to slavery and the uprooting of the native American people, the adoption of the “invisible hand” of the unregulated free markets as a keystone of the American democracy has driven humanity to a point where “humanity has learned very little as the result of the World War (1914-1945).” The foreign interference of Zionism in the American democracy further complicates the situation.

First of all, it must be recognized that the cause of all world unrest, of the world wars which have wrecked humanity and the widespread misery upon our planet can largely be attributed to a selfish group with materialistic purposes who have for centuries exploited the masses and used the labour of mankind for their selfish ends. From the feudal barons of Europe and Great Britain in the Middle Ages through the powerful business groups of the Victorian era to the handful of capitalists—national and international—who today control the world’s resources, the capitalistic system has emerged and has wrecked the world. This group of capitalists has cornered and exploited the world’s resources and the staples required for civilized living; they have been able to do this because they have owned and controlled the world’s wealth through their interlocking directorates and have retained it in their own hands. They have made possible the vast differences existing between the very rich and the very poor; they love money and the power which money gives; they have stood behind governments and politicians; they have controlled the electorate; they have made possible the narrow nationalistic aims of selfish politics; they have financed the world businesses and controlled oil, coal, [Page 71] power, light and transportation; they control publicly or sub rosa the world’s banking accounts.

The responsibility for the widespread misery to be found today in every country in the world lies predominantly at the door of certain major interrelated groups of business-men, bankers, executives of international cartels, monopolies, trusts and organizations and directors of huge corporations who work for corporate or personal gain. They are not interested in benefiting the public except in so far that the public demand for better living conditions will enable them—under the Law of Supply and Demand—to provide the goods, the transportation, light and power which will in the long run bring in heavier financial returns. Exploitation of man-power, the manipulation of the major planetary resources and the promotion of war for private or business profit are characteristic of their methods.

In every nation, such men and organizations—responsible for the capitalistic system—are to be found. The ramifications of their businesses and their financial grasp upon humanity were, prior to the war, active in every land and though they went underground during the war, they still exist. They form an international group, closely interrelated, working in complete unity of idea and intention and knowing and understanding each other. These men belonged to both the Allied Nations and the Axis Powers; they have worked together before and through the entire period of the war through interlocking directorates, under false names and through deceptive organizations, aided by neutrals of their own way of thinking. Today, in spite of the disaster which they have brought upon the world, they are again organized and renewing their methods; their goals remain unchanged; their international relationships remain unbroken; they constitute the greatest menace mankind faces today; they control politics; they buy prominent [Page 72] men in every nation; they insure silence through threat, cash and fear; they amass wealth and buy a spurious popularity through philanthropic enterprise; their families live soft and easy lives and seldom know the meaning of God-ordained work; they surround themselves with beauty, luxury and possessions and shut their eyes to the poverty, stark unhappiness, lack of warmth and decent clothing, the starvation and the ugliness of the lives of the millions by whom they are surrounded; they contribute to charities and church agencies as a salve to their consciences or to avoid income taxes; they provide work for countless thousands but see to it that these thousands receive so small a wage that real comfort, leisure, culture and travel are impossible.

The above is a terrible indictment. It can, however, be substantiated a thousand times over; it is breeding revolution and a growing spirit of unrest. The masses of the people in every land are aroused and awakening and a new day is dawning. A war is starting between the selfish monied interests and the mass of humanity who demand fair play and a right share of the world’s wealth.

There are those, however, within the capitalistic system who are aware of the danger with which the monied interests are faced and whose natural tendency is to think along broader and more humanitarian lines. These men fall into two main groups:

First, those who are real humanitarians, who seek the good of their fellowmen and who have no desire to exploit the masses or to profit by the misery of others. They have risen to place and power through their sheer ability or through inherited business position and they cannot avoid the responsibility of the disposal of the millions in their hands. They are frequently rendered helpless by their fellow executives and their hands are largely tied by the existing rules of the game, by their [Page 73] sense of responsibility to their stockholders and by the realization that, no matter what they do—fight or resign—the situation remains unchanged. It is too big for the individual. They remain, therefore, relatively powerless. They are fair and just, decent and kind, simple in their way of life and with a true sense of values, but there is little of a potent nature that they can do.

Second, those who are clever enough to read the signs of the times; they realize that the capitalistic system cannot continue indefinitely in the face of humanity’s rising demands and the steady emerging of the spiritual values. They are beginning therefore to change their methods and to universalize their businesses and to institute cooperative procedures with their employees. Their inherent selfishness prompts the change and the instinct of self-preservation determines their attitudes. In between these two groups are those who belong to neither the one nor the other; they are a fruitful field for the propaganda of the selfish capitalist or the unselfish humanitarian.

It might be well to add here that the selfish thinking and the separative motivation which distinguishes the capitalistic system is also to be found in the small and unimportant business men—in the corner grocery, the plumber and the haberdasher who exploits his employees and deceives his customers. It is the universal spirit of selfishness and the love of power with which we have to contend. The war has, however, acted like a purge. It has opened the eyes of men to the underlying cause of war—economic distress, based on the exploitation of the planet’s resources by an international group of selfish and ambitious men. The opportunity to change things is now present.

–The Tibetan Master in The Problems of Humanity, pp. 70–73.

Note: To fully appreciate the balanced approach of a Master of Wisdom and Compassion, the reader is encouraged to review the CHAPTER III – THE PROBLEM OF CAPITAL, LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT of which this section of the book The Problems of Humanity has been extracted. Both the labor movement and communism are offered constructive criticism because of their adoption of capitalistic principles (i.e., “the Labour Movement is itself now capitalistic“). Still, the Master, on behalf of the planetary spiritual Hierarchy, unequivocally states: “Power in the future lies in the hands of the masses. These masses are moving forward and by the sheer weight of their numbers, by their planned thinking and the rapidly growing interrelation now established between labour movements all over the world, nothing today can stop their progress. The major asset which labour has over capital is that it is working for countless millions whilst the capitalist works for the good of a few. The norm of humanity lies at the heart of the labour movement.”

Through a well-orchestrated disinformation campaign, the American electorate — a fraction of the vote-eligible population and under the foreign interference from Netanyahu and Putin — has been misled to believe that the MAGA ideology — and its current evangelist, Trump — will solve their plights. A discredited esoteric astrologer has even remarked that “being somewhat of a swamp creature himself – via his business dealings in NYC and association with various nefarious personalities, [Trump] is well qualified to understand how the swamp works.” By this same flawed logic, we must elect a gangster to defeat the mafia in the United States. Absurd!

“The Blob” is a classic science fiction horror film originally released in 1958. The movie features a mysterious, gelatinous alien life form that crashes to Earth inside a meteorite. As the blob consumes everything in its path, it grows larger and more menacing. The film is notable for its special effects and its portrayal of the blob as an unstoppable force. It has become a cult classic for the devoted following that the film has garnered over the years. The film was remade in 1988 with updated effects and a similar storyline.

The MAGA blob must be resisted to save the original, unblemished Masonic ideal of democracy that was reborn in the 1776 American experiment of self-governance. It should be opposed in the same manner that Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. challenged unjust and unconstitutional laws: through peaceful civil resistance.

In the original 1958 film “The Blob,” the creature is ultimately defeated by freezing it. The characters discover that the blob is vulnerable to cold temperatures, so they use fire extinguishers to freeze it, stopping its advance. Once immobilized, the blob is transported to the Arctic, where it is left in a frozen state, unable to cause further harm. This solution highlights the classic science fiction trope of finding a simple yet effective weakness to overcome an otherwise unstoppable force.

The Labours of Hercules

Labour 8 – Destroying the Lernaean Hydra

… the legend of Hercules, the Sun-God who overcomes the nine-headed Hydra or serpent of desire by being forced to his knees and from that position of humility lifts up the serpent into the air, and then deliverance comes.

Will the world Hercules lift this problem up into heaven and “elevate the Hydra” of passion and hate, of greed and aggression, and of selfishness and ambition up into the region of the soul? Or will it carry the whole matter down on to the physical plane with the inevitable corollary of world disaster, world war and death? Such are the problems with which the guiding Hierarchy is faced.

Tests in Scorpio

The three tests in Scorpio also concern the three aspects of the human being as they fuse and blend upon the physical plane. They are, first of all, the test of appetite. This appetite is the natural predilections and tendencies which are inherent in the animal nature and these are mainly three: Sex, physical comfort, and money, as concretised energy. They are, secondly, the tests connected with desire and the astral plane. These are subtler in nature, producing automatic effects upon the physical plane; they are not inherent in the animal nature but are imposed by the desire nature and are again three in number: Fear, hatred and ambition or desire for power. Then there are, thirdly, the tests of the lower critical mind which are: Pride, separativeness and cruelty. Remember that the worst kind of cruelty is not of a physical nature but is more mental in character. Therefore, you have in the category of that which must be tested and proved to be non-existent the following categories, which I am re-enumerating because of their basic importance: [Page 206]

(1)
| 1. Sex—the relation of the pairs of opposites. These can be selfishly utilised or divinely blended.
| 2. Physical comfort—life conditions, selfishly appropriated.
| 3. Money—selfishly cornered (if I may use such a phrase).

(2)
| 1. Fear—which conditions activity today.
| 2. Hate—which is a factor in conditioning relationships.
| 3. Ambition—conditioning objectives.

(3)
| 1. Pride—which is intellectual satisfaction, making the mind the barrier to soul control.
| 2. Separativeness—which is the isolated attitude and which makes the mind the barrier to right group relations.
| 3. Cruelty—which is satisfaction with personality methods and which makes the mind the instrument of the sense of power.

When these faults are realised and are overcome, the result is twofold: the establishing of right relations with the soul and also with the environment. These two results are the goal of all tests in Scorpio.

The keynotes of this sign are, therefore, test, trial and triumph. They can also be called struggle, strength and Sagittarian attitudes. Another angle of the experience in Scorpio can be covered by two words : re-capitulation and re-orientation.

[…]

When the mind has reached a relatively high stage of development, the memory aspect is evoked in a new and conscious manner and then every latent pre-disposition, every racial and national instinct, every unconquered situation and every controlling fault rises to the surface of consciousness and then—the fight is on [between the Dweller on the Threshold and the Angel of the Presence]. The keynote of Scorpio is, however, Triumph. This is its major expression upon the physical plane. As a result of struggle and of victory, the whole divine man—not yet perfectly expressing himself, if I might word the situation thus—is anchored upon the physical plane with such accuracy and clarity that there is no escape from the environing conclusions of the disciple’s family, friends and group that he is a disciple. From that angle he is meticulously watched; he learns the meaning of the word “example”; he is pilloried [attacked or ridiculed publicly] by those who are onlookers and the first conscious stages toward group awareness and group response, plus group service, are now taken. Such is the outcome and the reward of the experience in Scorpio.

–The Tibetan Master in Esoteric Astrology

Scorpio Full Moon
November 15, 2024, at 4:28 p.m. EST (21:28 GMT)
(This ‘Beaver Moon’ is special because it’s the last of four consecutive super moons in 2024)

Keynote:
Ordinary wheel: “Let maya flourish and deception rule.”
Reversed wheel: “Warrior am I and from the battle I emerge triumphant.”

Hercules Tests in Scorpio
Applied to the United States in the 21st Century

Lernean Hydra: Nine Heads	Dweller on Threshold	Angel of Presence
Sex	Criminalize abortion. Distrust women.	Prevent unwanted pregnancies. Freedom of responsible choice.
Comfort	Environmental assault. Cheap oil and labor.	Freedom from want. Basic world needs are met.
Money	Capitalist greed. Corruption.	Regulated free markets. Transparency.
Fear	Provoke terrorists and kill them. Armageddon.	Freedom from fear. Prevent terrorism.
Hate	Fundamentalist crusades against infidels. Military imposition of American values. Xenophobia.	Goodwill. Plan of Love and Light. Spirit of Peace.
Ambition	Domestic fascism. American imperialism internationally.	Democracy. Right human relations. Spiritual power.
Pride	Self-righteousness. America First.	Adjusted sense of right proportion (humility).
Separateness	The chosen people complex. American exceptionalism.	Internationalism. Constructive U.N. reforms.
Cruelty	The sick and poor deserve their lot.	Compassion. Equitable distribution of resources.
Keynotes	*And the Word said: Let Maya flourish and deception rule.*	*Warrior I am, and from the battle I emerge triumphant.*

We shall overcome, some day.

Racism: A Treatable Mental Disorder

Eradicating Racial Supremacy:
Lessons from History and Health

The inception of the United States was contaminated with the institution of slavery, which was justified and perpetuated by a racial supremacist ideology. This ideology posited the inherent superiority of one race over another, providing the moral and economic justification for enslaving African peoples.

Native American Indians were not enslaved in the same manner as African Blacks for several reasons:

Resistance and Escape: Native Americans were familiar with the land, which made it easier for them to escape and resist enslavement. Their knowledge of the terrain and ability to find refuge with other tribes made them less reliable as a labor force compared to Africans, who were far from their homeland and unfamiliar with the new environment.

Population Decline: The Native American population suffered significant declines due to diseases brought by Europeans, to which they had no immunity. This population decrease reduced the number of potential enslaved individuals and made it difficult to sustain a large-scale system of Native American slavery.

Economic Considerations: The transatlantic slave trade provided a more consistent and economically viable source of labor. Africans were forcibly brought in large numbers, creating a more stable and controllable labor force for plantation economies.

Legal and Social Structures: The legal frameworks and social structures established by European colonizers were designed to support the enslavement of Africans. The Slave Codes specifically targeted Africans, creating a racialized system of slavery that was distinct from the treatment of Native Americans.

Alliances and Conflicts: European colonists often formed alliances with certain Native American tribes for trade and military purposes. Enslaving these potential allies could disrupt these relationships and lead to conflicts that colonists wanted to avoid.

These factors combined to make African slavery more feasible and profitable for European colonists, leading to the establishment and expansion of the transatlantic slave trade.

The American Civil War, fought between 1861 and 1865, was a pivotal moment that challenged this ideology militarily. The abolition of slavery was a significant victory, yet it did not eradicate the underlying racial supremacist beliefs that continued to permeate American society.

In the years following the Civil War, racial supremacy remained latent, much like a dormant infection. It surfaced periodically through systemic discrimination, segregation, and the disenfranchisement of African Americans. Despite the progress made during the Civil Rights Movement, racial supremacy has found new life in modern times, notably in the ideologies espoused by some extreme factions of the MAGA movement. This resurgence highlights the persistent nature of these ideologies, which can retreat into the background only to emerge with renewed vigor.

“You can look your children in the eye and say, ‘We did it, we saved America, we saved this republic. We didn’t let it get stolen from us.'” –Stephen Miller

trump-stephen-miller-deputy-chief-of-staff-immigration-policy-deportations

Anti-immigrant sentiment against non-white immigrants is yet another manifestation of racial supremacist ideology, reflecting deeply ingrained beliefs in racial superiority and exclusion. This sentiment often stems from the same ideological roots that have historically justified discrimination and inequality, perpetuating a narrative that positions non-white immigrants as threats to societal norms and resources. Such attitudes can heavily influence policy decisions, leading to restrictive immigration laws and practices that dehumanize and marginalize immigrant communities. These policies not only hinder social cohesion but also impede the progress toward an inclusive society. Addressing and dismantling these anti-immigrant attitudes is crucial in the broader effort to eradicate racial supremacy, as it challenges the very notions of exclusion that fuel division and inequality.

To understand and combat this phenomenon, we can look to the medical field for guidance. Tuberculosis, the leading cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide, serves as an apt metaphor. TB exists in two forms: latent TB infection (LTBI) and active TB disease. While LTBI is not immediately symptomatic, it poses a significant risk of developing into active TB if left untreated. To eradicate TB globally, it is crucial to treat LTBI proactively, preventing its progression to the active disease.

Similarly, to eradicate racial supremacist ideologies, mere suppression of is insufficient. These ideologies must be actively addressed at their roots, akin to treating LTBI before it becomes active. This requires comprehensive strategies that include education, policy reform, and societal engagement. Just as the treatment of LTBI demands medical intervention, the eradication of racial supremacy necessitates a collective effort grounded in goodwill and the commitment to foster inclusivity and equity.

In conclusion, the persistence of racial supremacist ideology in the United States, from its early manifestation in slavery to its contemporary expressions, underscores the need for proactive measures to combat it. Drawing on the analogy of LTBI and active TB, we recognize that addressing the latent forms of racial supremacy is critical to preventing their resurgence. Through concerted societal effort and a commitment to justice and equality, we can work towards eradicating these destructive ideologies from the consciousness of humanity, ensuring a future that truly reflects the foundational ideals of liberty and equality for all.

The SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people.

On Democracy

There are three aspects of democracy: as a spiritual ideal, a political system, and its specific implementation in the United States.

17th Century Masonic Ideal: Democracy is seen as a spiritual ideal of human relationships, emphasizing inalienable rights and equality, ignoring distinctions like race or social status, as highlighted in the Masonic ideals. It focuses on the common humanity shared by all, promoting a harmonious society where personal differences are minimized.
18th vs. 19th Century Ideals: The 18th-century view was philosophical and intellectual, linked to Enlightenment thinkers like Rousseau, who believed in the inherent goodness of humans. The 19th-century perspective became more emotional and religious, focusing on the common people and movements like Abolitionism in America, influenced by figures like Thomas Paine and Abraham Lincoln.
Political System: Democracy as a political system involves governance by the consent of the governed, aiming for a society where everyone has the opportunity for life, liberty, and happiness. This idealistic foundation is seen as a faith in human potential and the ability to create a just society.

Throughout history, several nations and empires have embarked on ambitious experiments in self-government, though each with its unique context and challenges.

Ancient Athens: Often credited as the birthplace of democracy, Athens experimented with direct democracy where citizens could participate in decision-making processes. This was a groundbreaking approach to governance at the time.
The Roman Republic: Before becoming an empire, Rome was a republic with a complex system of checks and balances, including elected officials and a Senate, which influenced many modern democratic systems.
The Magna Carta in England: In 1215, the Magna Carta laid the groundwork for constitutional governance by limiting the powers of the king and establishing certain legal protections for subjects, influencing future democratic developments.
The Dutch Republic: In the 16th and 17th centuries, the Dutch Republic was notable for its relatively progressive and decentralized form of government, emphasizing trade and religious tolerance.
The French Revolution: Inspired by Enlightenment ideals, the French Revolution sought to establish a republic based on liberty, equality, and fraternity, though it faced significant turmoil and challenges.

While these examples reflect ambitious attempts at self-governance, the American experiment is distinct in its scale, longevity, and influence, particularly in its emphasis on a written constitution and the balance of powers.

The United States of America

This bold undertaking, initiated by the Founding Fathers, was grounded in the revolutionary ideals of liberty, equality, and the unalienable rights of individuals. It sought to establish a nation where the power of governance emanated from the consent of the governed, embodying a profound commitment to democracy and the pursuit of happiness. This experiment has thrived on its dynamic spirit of innovation and adaptability, continuously evolving to meet the challenges of each era while striving to uphold the principles enshrined in its founding documents. The American journey is a testament to the enduring quest for a more perfect union, where the promise of freedom and justice for all remains its guiding star.

Historical timeline

1620: Arrival of the Pilgrims at Plymouth
- On December 21, 1620, the Pilgrims arrived at Plymouth, Massachusetts, establishing one of the first enduring English settlements in North America. This event marked the beginning of a new chapter in European colonization efforts, laying the groundwork for future settlements.
1630s: Great Migration
- Throughout the 1630s, thousands of Puritans migrated to Massachusetts Bay Colony, driven by a quest for religious freedom and economic opportunity. This influx significantly expanded the population and influence of English settlements in the New World.
1660s: Establishment of the Slave Codes
- The 1660s saw the codification of racial slavery through laws known as Slave Codes. These laws defined the status of enslaved Africans and institutionalized the practice of slavery, laying the foundation for its expansion in the colonies.
1675-1678: King Philip’s War
- King Philip’s War, fought between Native American inhabitants of New England and English settlers, was one of the deadliest conflicts per capita in American history. The war decimated Native populations and expanded colonial territories.
1692: Salem Witch Trials
- In 1692, the Salem Witch Trials unfolded in Massachusetts, reflecting the tensions and hysteria within colonial society. These events highlighted the dangers of extremism and the fragile nature of nascent colonial communities.
1754-1763: French and Indian War
- The French and Indian War was the North American theater of the worldwide Seven Years’ War, involving British and French forces, along with their respective Native American allies. The British victory significantly expanded their territorial claims in North America but left Britain with a massive war debt that influenced subsequent colonial policies.
1763: Proclamation of 1763
- Issued by King George III, the Proclamation of 1763 aimed to stabilize relations with Native Americans by halting the westward expansion of settlers. However, it frustrated colonists eager for new land, sowing seeds of discontent.
1765: Stamp Act
- The Stamp Act of 1765 imposed direct taxes on the colonies for the first time, covering printed materials. This act sparked protests and was pivotal in uniting colonists against perceived British overreach, contributing to the rise of revolutionary sentiments.
1770: Boston Massacre
- The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770, when British soldiers killed five colonial civilians. This incident inflamed anti-British sentiments and was used as a rallying point for colonial resistance against British rule.
1773: Boston Tea Party
- In December 1773, the Boston Tea Party was a direct action protest by colonists against the Tea Act. By dumping an entire shipment of tea into Boston Harbor, colonists demonstrated their resistance to taxation without representation.
1774: First Continental Congress
- The First Continental Congress convened in 1774 as a response to the Intolerable Acts. Representing a unified colonial response, it marked a significant step toward coordinated resistance against British policies.
1775-1776: Battles of Lexington and Concord
- In April 1775, the Battles of Lexington and Concord were the first military engagements of the American Revolutionary War, signaling the start of armed conflict between Britain and its American colonies.
July 4, 1776: Declaration of Independence
- The Declaration of Independence, adopted on July 4, 1776, formally asserted the colonies’ intention to separate from Britain. This document articulated the colonies’ desire for self-governance and laid the philosophical foundation for the new nation.

A significant number of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence and Washington’s generals were Freemasons. The America of figures like Franklin, Paine, Jefferson, and Washington, as well as the Declaration of Independence, was influenced by the ideals of Freemasonry. Freemasonry emphasized principles such as liberty, equality, fraternity, and the pursuit of knowledge, which resonated with Enlightenment ideals and the revolutionary spirit of the time. Many of these leaders were either Freemasons themselves or were influenced by the same philosophical currents that shaped Masonic thought, contributing to the foundational values of the new nation.

According to Dane Rudhyar, the Masonic Lodge is envisioned as a model for a new societal order, integrating democracy and hierarchy through ritual. The Lodge symbolizes a cohesive social organism, offering a blueprint for effective group integration beyond the family unit. While Masonry has become more fraternal, its foundational ideas hold relevance for societal integration.

The Masonic Lodge, briefly said, is to be considered (and undoubtedly was meant) as a small model, an experimental structure, for the testing and the proving of the new order of society envisioned by some of the Founders of Modern Masonry.

It is a microcosm of the new society which should emerge out of the present world-crisis, after we learn to integrate the two complementary Principles of fundamental democracy and operative hierarchy. Such an integration is strongly related to the factor of ritual. Ritual, broadly speaking, can be defined as organic group-activity performed under law and with an integral and integrating consciousness of the meaning and value of symbolism. –Dane Rhudyar

1781: Victory at Yorktown
- In October 1781, the American Revolutionary War effectively ended with the Siege of Yorktown. American and French forces, led by General George Washington, defeated the British army under General Cornwallis. This victory was pivotal in securing American independence.
1783: Treaty of Paris
- The Treaty of Paris was signed on September 3, 1783, formally ending the Revolutionary War. It recognized the independence of the United States and established borders for the new nation, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mississippi River.
1781-1789: Articles of Confederation
- The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, ratified in 1781. They created a loose confederation of states with a weak central government, lacking authority to tax or regulate commerce effectively.
1786-1787: Shays’ Rebellion
- Shays’ Rebellion, an armed uprising in Massachusetts, highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The inability of the federal government to quell the rebellion underscored the need for a stronger national government.
1787: Constitutional Convention
- In May 1787, delegates convened in Philadelphia to address the inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention resulted in the drafting of a new Constitution, creating a stronger federal government with separate executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
1787: The Great Compromise
- During the Constitutional Convention, the Great Compromise resolved disputes between large and small states by establishing a bicameral legislature, with representation by population in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate.
1787: Three-Fifths Compromise
- To address how enslaved individuals would be counted for representation and taxation, the Three-Fifths Compromise was reached, counting three out of every five slaves for these purposes.
1787: Federalist Papers
- The Federalist Papers, a series of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, were published to advocate for the ratification of the new Constitution. They explained the benefits of a strong central government and addressed concerns about potential abuses of power.
1788: Ratification of the U.S. Constitution
- The Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth state to approve it. This marked the official adoption of the new framework of government, replacing the Articles of Confederation.
1789: Inauguration of George Washington
- On April 30, 1789, George Washington was inaugurated as the first President of the United States, symbolizing the implementation of the new constitutional government and the beginning of a unified nation.

This sequence of events laid the groundwork for the establishment of a strong federal government, ensuring stability and unity for the new country.

Fatal Mistakes

This bold experiment in self-governance has been marked by an inherent flaw. Slavery was a significant blemish on the American experiment in self-government from its inception. Despite the founding ideals of liberty and equality, slavery was deeply entrenched in the social and economic fabric of the early United States. This contradiction between the nation’s democratic principles and the reality of slavery led to profound conflicts and debates, ultimately culminating in the Civil War. The legacy of slavery has had lasting impacts on American society, influencing ongoing discussions about race, equality, and justice.

The mistreatment of Native Americans by colonists is another significant blemish on the American experiment in self-governance. The expansion of European settlers into Native American lands often involved broken treaties, forced removals, and violent conflicts, which starkly contrasted with the democratic ideals of liberty and justice that the United States was founded upon. This history of displacement and cultural erasure highlights the contradictions and moral failings in the early implementation of American self-governance, where the rights and sovereignty of Native peoples were frequently disregarded.

Freemasonry and slavery

Freemasonry, as an organization, has long espoused the ideals of universal brotherhood, equality, and moral integrity. However, its historical stance on slavery is complex and varied, largely due to the decentralized nature of Masonic lodges and the influence of local cultural and societal norms.

Diverse Practices: Freemasonry is not a monolithic organization; it consists of numerous independent lodges and Grand Lodges worldwide. This means that practices and stances on issues like slavery could differ significantly from one lodge to another, especially in different countries or regions.
Moral Teachings: The core teachings of Freemasonry emphasize the equality of all men and the importance of moral and ethical behavior. These principles are inherently at odds with the institution of slavery, which is based on inequality and exploitation.
Historical Context: In the 18th and 19th centuries, when slavery was a contentious issue, some Masonic lodges in regions where slavery was prevalent did not explicitly oppose it. This was often due to the prevailing social and economic norms of the time, which influenced the attitudes of individual Masons and lodges.
Abolitionist Masons: Despite this, there were many Freemasons who were active abolitionists and who used their influence to advocate against slavery. These individuals often drew on Masonic principles of brotherhood and equality to support their stance.
- Thomas Paine was an abolitionist. He was an outspoken critic of slavery and advocated for the rights and freedoms of enslaved individuals. Paine’s writings, including his pamphlet “African Slavery in America,” published in 1775, condemned the practice of slavery and called for its abolition. His views on equality and human rights were consistent with his broader Enlightenment ideals, which emphasized liberty and justice for all individuals.
- Benjamin Franklin became an abolitionist. Although he owned slaves earlier in his life, Franklin’s views evolved, and he became a vocal advocate for the abolition of slavery. In the late 1780s, he became the president of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, where he actively worked towards ending slavery and promoting the rights of freed African Americans. Franklin’s shift towards abolitionism reflected his broader Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality.
Modern Perspective: Today, Freemasonry universally condemns slavery and upholds the principles of human rights and equality. The organization reflects a commitment to the ideals of freedom and justice for all individuals
- Many U.S. presidents, including FDR, were members of the Masons. Franklin Roosevelt was initiated October 10, 1911, passed November 14, 1911, and raised November 28, 1911, in Holland Lodge, No. 8, New York City.
- Harry S Truman was an enthusiastic Missouri Freemason, and served as the Grand Master of that state in 1940-41. Coincidentally, he was a 33° Scottish Rite Freemason, and also 33rd president of the U.S.

While the ideals of Freemasonry are fundamentally opposed to slavery, historical practices varied, and the organization’s stance evolved over time, aligning more closely with its core principles of universal brotherhood and equality.

Common Sense, 2024 edition

“Common Sense,” written by Thomas Paine in 1776, played a pivotal role in American history by galvanizing public opinion in favor of independence from Britain.

Historical Context

Colonial Discontent: By the mid-1770s, American colonists were increasingly frustrated with British rule. Issues such as taxation without representation, the imposition of the Stamp Act, and the Intolerable Acts had heightened tensions.
Growing Independence Movement: While some colonists still hoped for reconciliation with Britain, the idea of complete independence was gaining traction. The Continental Congress was convening, and skirmishes like those at Lexington and Concord had already occurred.
Need for Persuasion: Despite growing unrest, many colonists were undecided about breaking away from Britain. There was a need for a compelling argument to sway public opinion towards independence.

Main Message

Advocacy for Independence: Paine’s pamphlet argued forcefully for American independence. He contended that it was not only necessary but also inevitable and beneficial for the colonies to break free from British rule.
Critique of Monarchy: Paine criticized the concept of monarchy and hereditary succession, portraying them as unjust and absurd. He argued that the British monarchy was an oppressive force that did not have the colonies’ best interests at heart.
Call for a Republic: Paine advocated for the establishment of a republic, where government would be based on democratic principles and the consent of the governed, rather than on monarchical rule.
Economic Arguments: He highlighted the economic disadvantages of remaining tied to Britain, suggesting that independence would allow for free trade and economic prosperity.
Moral and Practical Reasons: Paine appealed to both moral and practical reasons for independence, emphasizing the natural rights of individuals and the practical benefits of self-governance.

“Common Sense” was written in clear, persuasive prose, making it accessible to a wide audience. Its publication had a profound impact, helping to shift public opinion towards supporting the revolutionary cause and laying the groundwork for the Declaration of Independence later that year.

A Future Revealed

Written in 2125

“Intuitive Sense,” penned in 2024 by the reincarnated Thomas Paine under the pseudonym “A Disciple,” significantly influenced world history by rallying public support for independence from the ruling class that prioritized wealth and political power over truth and justice.

Historical Context

World Discontent: By the mid-2020s, men and women of goodwill worldwide were increasingly frustrated with the mob rule that had infected most democracies. Issues such as climate change denial, AI-assisted disinformation in a post-truth world and the impunity of the Zionists’ genocide of Palestinian population had heightened tensions.
Growing Independence Movement: While some continued to hope for reconciliation with the ruling class, the notion of complete independence was gaining momentum. A World Congress for Goodwill, Human Rights, and Peace was being convened, as resistance movements against fascism were already emerging in the United States and Europe.
Need for Persuasion: Despite growing unrest, many people were undecided about breaking away from the ruling class system. There was a need for a compelling argument to sway public opinion towards independence.

Main Message

Advocacy for Independence: Paine’s new pamphlet argued forcefully for global independence. He contended that it was not only necessary but also inevitable and beneficial for the people to break free from the ruling class.
Critique of Democracy: Paine criticized the concept of populism and mob rule, portraying them as unjust and absurd. He argued that the ruling class was an oppressive force that did not have the peoples’ best interests at heart.
Call for a Hierarchical Democracy: Paine advocated for the establishment of a hierarchical democracy, a form of constitutional government (of the enlightened people, by the enlightened people, for the enlightenment of the people).
Economic Arguments: He highlighted the economic disadvantages of remaining tied to ruling class system, suggesting that independence would allow for right human relations, economic prosperity and a return to simpler and healthier lifestyles.
Moral and Practical Reasons: Paine appealed to both moral and practical reasons for independence, emphasizing the natural rights of individuals and the practical benefits of self-governance. To support this socially-conscious, moral and practical perspective, he introduced a fresh notion of “common sense” for humanity, which he described as a meta-rational “intuitive sense.”

“Intuitive Sense” was written in clear, persuasive prose, making it accessible to a wide audience. Its publication had a profound impact, helping to shift public opinion towards supporting the resistance cause and laying the groundwork for the World Declaration of Independence next year (2025).

Declaration of Independence

When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for the people to break away from the chains with their national shadows and, according to God’s Plan, to assume its soul’s prerogatives and duties within the broader human community, a decent respect for its past history requires that they should declare the reasons which impel them to such action.

Self-evident truths reveal themselves only through the light of intuition. Inspired by this light, we affirm the self-evident nature of these three principles: our essential divinity, our unanimous recognition of a Higher Intelligence and the transformative power of goodwill.

The principle of essential divinity holds that all men and women are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights rooted in universal laws. Essential divinity, innately expressed as goodwill, promotes right human relations and a spiritual approach on life and its circumstances. Thus endowed, individuals can always be trusted to arise to the call of the enduring spirit of humanity in its pursuit of the Good, the Beautiful and the True.

Liberty embodies the recognition of right human relations, freely adjusted, willingly embraced and driven by a sense of responsibility. As a fundamental aspect of human dignity and autonomy, liberty represents the initial revelation bestowed upon humanity regarding the nature of God’s Will. The freedom to explore, create, and contribute to the world is part of the divine plan, enabling individuals to realize their potential and contribute to the greater good. When individuals are free to seek truth, wisdom, and a deeper understanding of the divine, the pursuit of knowledge and self-discovery reflects God’s intention for humanity to grow and evolve.

Equality arises from a well-developed sense of proportion and a deep understanding of both the spiritual and natural laws that govern rebirth, as well as the principle of cause and effect. These natural laws not only recognize the age and experience of a soul but also take into account the various stages of its development. Each soul goes through unique experiences through many lives that shape its journey, influencing its growth and understanding of equality. By appreciating these nuances, a more compassionate and equitable society is fostered that honors the diverse paths each individual takes in their quest for enlightenment and fulfillment.

Therefore, the true meaning of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” is revisited and recognized as a group endeavor that gradually gradually unveils the fundamental theme of brotherhood and freedom inherent in humanity. “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” are rooted on the divine origin of life, leading to a true expression of divinity through brotherly love and freedom. Only by wholeheartedly embracing this vision can we hope to restore true and lasting peace on Earth, paving the way for the attainment of happiness, personal fulfillment, and well-being.

To secure these rights, new forms of governance must be instituted, governments deriving their just powers from the free and well-informed consent of the governed.

A Hierarchical Democracy is a form of constitutional government (of the enlightened people, by the enlightened people, for the enlightenment of the people) in which political power is exercised by consent of the governed, as a result of consensus between an enlightened meritocracy of servant leaders qualified by spiritual training and experience, and the free and fully informed (good) will of an enlightened public, adept in self-rule and right human relations. This system operates with full transparency, accountability, and inclusiveness, upholding civil liberties, protecting human rights, and ensuring equal representation. It features a robust separation of powers and impartial judicial oversight to maintain a balanced and fair governance structure.

We, therefore, men and women of goodwill representing Humanity, assembled in General World Congress, appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions. In the name, and by authority of the good People of every country, we solemnly publish and declare,

That Humanity is, and rightfully should be, free and Independent of its Shadow;
that we are released from any allegiance to it, and all political ties to this Shadow should be completely dissolved; and
that as a free and independent people, we possess the full power to carry out all actions and endeavors that independent individuals are entitled to undertake.

In support of this Declaration, and with unwavering faith in the safeguarding power of divine Providence, we mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor to one another.

Thus reads a chronicle in The Hermetic Observatory, a prominent newspaper in 2125, marking the 100th anniversary of the 2025 Declaration of Independence. Since that pivotal moment, an increasing intuitive awareness within the Human Kingdom has made possible the externalization of the planetary spiritual Hierarchy and the reemergence of the World Teacher. This development aims to restore the rightful Rule of the Lord of the World at Shamballa, unveil the World Mother as the Queen of the Angelic Kingdom, and express the magical work of the soul in all fields of human endeavor: political, educational, business, artistic, scientific religious and financial.
-Akashic Records

Aquarian Pledge

We pledge allegiance to Three Principles embodying the essence of the New Aquarian Age:

We believe… that recognition of our ESSENTIAL DIVINITY is our birthright and method of Spiritual Approach to God.
We believe… that GOODWILL is the healing substance making Right Human Relations possible.
We believe… that UNANIMITY is a freely and spontaneously realized attitude of mind inspiring Group Endeavor.

To these Principles we solemnly pledge ourselves invoking our Higher Self…
to THE GLORY OF THE ONE!

The New Intuitive Sense

Intuition: Integrating on Time

by José Becerra

Random notes for a book in progress

Ideals Reveal the Soul of a Nation

The Keirsey Temperaments provide a framework for understanding human behavior by categorizing individuals into four types: Artisans, Guardians, Idealists, and Rationals. This model, developed by Dr. David Keirsey, highlights how these temperaments influence communication styles, action approaches, and societal roles.

Artisans are pragmatic creators who communicate concretely and act with efficiency. They value creativity and adaptability, often excelling as craftsmen and performers.
Guardians are reliable organizers with a straightforward communication style and a cooperative action approach. They prioritize reliability and service, commonly taking up roles as managers and protectors.
Idealists are empathetic visionaries who communicate abstract ideas and focus on cooperation. Driven by empathy and authenticity, they thrive as counselors and advocates for social change.
Rationals are strategic thinkers known for their abstract and utilitarian outlook. They value ingenuity and autonomy, often succeeding in roles like scientists and strategic planners.

Understanding these temperaments enhances personal development and interpersonal relationships by appreciating diverse thought processes and actions. This awareness fosters better communication, teamwork, and personal growth, enriching human connections.

Twenty of the American Presidents were Guardians, fourteen were Artisans, eight were Rationalists, and none were Idealists.

“Presidential Temperament” by David Keirsey and Ray Choiniere (1992)

According to Keirsey, the majority of American Presidents have been classified as Guardians (Washington, Carter), Artisans (Jackson, FDR, JFK, Reagan, Clinton), or Rationalists (Jefferson, Lincoln), with none identified as Idealists. This observation likely extends beyond American politics, suggesting that idealism has been more closely aligned with the domains of education, the arts, and religion rather than with the political sphere.

Though Thomas Jefferson can be regarded as an Idealist, his contributions as an analytical statesman—characterized by strategic thinking and effective implementation—likely had a greater impact than his notable achievements as a visionary and advocate for humanitarian values. Both perspectives highlight distinct aspects of his enduring influence and leadership. His idealism is made evident in drafting the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
–Preamble to the Declaration of Independence

So, why is the American electorate reluctant to elect Idealist presidents? In terms of “transpersonal politics,” is it a personality or a soul-driven collective decision?

Several U.S. presidential candidates who could be considered Idealists, based on their values and communication styles, have run for office and been defeated. Some notable examples are:

George McGovern: The Democratic nominee in 1972, McGovern was known for his anti-war stance and progressive ideals, but he lost to Richard Nixon in a landslide.
Walter Mondale: Running in 1984, Mondale was an advocate for social justice and equality, but he was defeated by Ronald Reagan.
Al Gore: Although he won the popular vote in 2000, Gore, known for his environmental advocacy, lost the presidency to George W. Bush after a contentious Supreme Court decision.
John Kerry, ran for the office of President of the United States in 2004. Known for his diplomatic and environmental efforts. Kerry’s work on climate change and international diplomacy reflects the idealists’ focus on future possibilities and humanitarian values.

These candidates often emphasized values like empathy, social justice, and visionary leadership, aligning with the Idealist temperament. Doubtlessly, other presidents —Democrats and Republicans— have upheld these idealistic values, but only Artisan or Guardian temperaments — a fewer Rationals— have succeeded in getting elected. What does this tells us about the electorate and its allegiance to the “founding principles” of a country? Is there a “Dweller” keeping the “ordinary American” away from its spiritual purpose, as expressed by the American Transcendentalists, like Emerson and Thoreau, guiding a nation towards a more harmonious and just future?

It is true that pure visionaries—abstract thinkers with diplomatic skills but lacking in strategic, tactical, and logistical acumen—often struggle to be effective politicians anywhere. In a democracy, idealists must equip themselves with these skills to persuade ordinary citizens —the majority of whom are concrete and not abstract thinkers — to elect them. Still, the field of politics itself can improve its ethical standards by qualifying candidates whose values are consistent with the soul and ideals of a country.

Famous leaders who are often considered Idealists, based on their focus on values, empathy, and visionary leadership, include:

Mahatma Gandhi: Known for his nonviolent resistance and emphasis on truth and justice, Gandhi’s leadership in India’s independence movement exemplifies Idealist qualities.
Martin Luther King Jr.: A key figure in the American civil rights movement, King is celebrated for his vision of equality and his ability to inspire change through nonviolent activism.
Nelson Mandela: As a leader in the fight against apartheid in South Africa, Mandela’s commitment to reconciliation and justice reflects Idealist principles.
Mother Teresa: Renowned for her humanitarian work and dedication to serving the poor, Mother Teresa’s life was driven by compassion and empathy.
Eleanor Roosevelt: As a First Lady and human rights advocate, Roosevelt championed social justice and equality, embodying Idealist values.

These leaders are recognized for their ability to inspire and mobilize others through their commitment to ideals and values. Would they have ever been presidents of the United States?

Keirsey Idealists are characterized by several distinct traits that define their approach to life and interactions with others:

Empathy and Compassion: Idealists are deeply empathetic and often prioritize understanding and supporting others’ emotional needs.
Visionary and Inspirational: They are driven by a strong sense of purpose and often inspire others with their vision for a better future.
Value-Driven: Idealists are guided by their core values and principles, often focusing on issues of justice, integrity, and authenticity.
Focus on Personal Growth: They are interested in personal development and helping others achieve their potential.
Strong Communication Skills: Idealists are often articulate and persuasive, using their communication skills to connect with and motivate others.
Desire for Harmony: They seek to create harmonious environments and are often skilled at mediating conflicts and fostering cooperation.

These characteristics make Idealists effective in roles that require understanding, inspiration, and a focus on human potential and values.

Another Missed Opportunity?

Within the Keirsey Temperament framework, Kamala Harris could also be classified as an Idealist. Her career and public persona exhibit traits that aligned with Idealist qualities, such as her focus on justice, equality, and advocacy for marginalized communities.

Kamala Harris’s career as a prosecutor laid the foundation for her Idealist traits, emphasizing justice and reform within the legal system. As San Francisco’s District Attorney and later as California’s Attorney General, Harris implemented programs like the Back on Track initiative, aimed at reducing recidivism and offering a second chance to first-time offenders. This program reflects her Idealist vision of transforming the justice system to better serve individuals and communities, highlighting her belief in rehabilitation over punishment. Her efforts to address systemic issues within law enforcement further underscore her commitment to justice and equality.

As a U.S. Senator, Harris’s advocacy for marginalized communities became even more pronounced. She championed legislation to protect the rights of women, immigrants, and people of color. Her push for comprehensive immigration reform and her vocal support for the Dream Act demonstrate her dedication to creating a more inclusive society. These actions align with the Idealist’s focus on empathy and understanding, aiming to foster a national environment where everyone has equal opportunities.

In her role as Vice President, Harris continues to embody Idealist values through her leadership style and policy priorities. Her focus on climate change, healthcare access, and economic equality reflects a forward-thinking approach that prioritizes the welfare of future generations. Harris’s emphasis on collaboration and unity in addressing these complex issues showcases her Idealist belief in collective action and the potential for societal improvement.

Harris’s public persona also resonates with Idealist qualities. Her speeches often highlight themes of hope, resilience, and the possibility of a better future. She inspires others to engage in civic life and to envision a world where justice and equality prevail. By leveraging her platform to amplify underrepresented voices, Harris reinforces her commitment to humanitarian values and the pursuit of a society that honors diversity and inclusivity.

Kamala Harris’s career and public engagement exemplify the key traits of the Idealist temperament in the Keirsey framework. Additionally, she has demonstrated strategic, tactical, and logistical intelligence across various policy issues, despite her challenges with immigration policy. Her unwavering focus on justice, equality, and advocacy for marginalized communities radiates through her work as a prosecutor, senator, and Vice President. Harris’s leadership exemplifies the Idealist’s dedication to pursuing future possibilities and fostering a compassionate, equitable world. Her actions and policies continue to inspire change, resonating with the Idealist vision of a society characterized by empathy and progress.

A Dangerous Artisan?

Ideals Reveal the Soul of a Nation

In the fabric of a nation’s leadership, the presence of Idealists holds profound significance. These leaders, with their unwavering commitment to justice, equality, and humanitarian values, illuminate the path toward a more enlightened future. Idealists possess the unique ability to shape a nation’s identity, guiding it with a moral compass that reflects the highest aspirations of its people. Their focus on empathy and inclusivity not only inspires societal progress but also fosters a culture where every voice is heard and valued.

By electing practical Idealists, a country invests in leaders who are not merely policymakers but visionaries, capable of steering the national consciousness towards compassion and equity. These leaders challenge the status quo, advocating for transformative change that elevates the common good. In doing so, they reveal the soul of a nation, one that is defined by its collective pursuit of a fair and just society.

The presence of Idealist leaders is crucial in navigating the complexities of a globalized world, offering a beacon of hope and resilience. As they guide the nation forward, they embody the ideals that resonate with the core of human dignity, ensuring that the future is not only brighter but also more inclusive and compassionate.

On Happiness, Joy and Bliss

It is helpful to differentiate between happiness, joy and bliss:

First, happiness, which has its seat in the emotions, and is a personality reaction.

Second, joy, which is a quality of the soul and is realised in the mind, when alignment takes place.

Third, bliss, which is the nature of the Spirit and about which speculation is fruitless until the soul realises its oneness with the Father. This realisation follows upon an earlier stage wherein the personal self is at-oned with the soul. Therefore speculation and analysis as to the nature of bliss is profitless to the average man whose metaphors and terminologies must perforce be personal and related to the world of the senses. Does the aspirant refer to his happiness or joy? If he refers to the latter it must come as the effect of group consciousness, of group solidarity, of oneness with all beings, and may not be interpreted in terms of happiness after all. Happiness comes when the personality is meeting with those conditions which satisfy it in one part or other of its lower nature; it comes when there is a sense of physical [Page 370] well being, of contentment with one’s environment or surrounding personalities, or of satisfaction with one’s mental opportunities and contacts. Happiness is the goal of the separated self.

When however we seek to live as souls, the contentment of the lower man is discounted and we find joy in our group relationships and in bringing about those conditions which lead to the better expression of the souls of those we contact. This bringing of joy to others in order to produce conditions in which they may better express themselves may have a physical effect as we seek to better their material conditions, or an emotional effect as our presence brings to them peace and uplift, or an intellectual result as we stimulate them to clarity of thought and understanding. But the effect upon ourselves is joy, for our action has been selfless and non-acquisitive, and not dependent upon the aspirant’s circumstance or worldly state. Much happiness is necessarily foregone when ill-health makes its pressure felt, as the environment is difficult and the “accumulated karma of many births” presses down, or as the troubles of the family, nation or race weigh upon the sensitive personality. The happiness of youth or the self-centred contentment of the selfish insulated person (hiding himself behind the shield of his protective desires) must not be confounded with joy.

It is a platitude as well as an occult paradox to say that in the midst of profound personality distress and unhappiness, the joy of the soul may be known and felt. Such however is the case, and it is for this the student must aim. Some people are happy because they shut their eyes to truth, or are self-hypnotised, hiding themselves within a shell of illusion. But the aspirant has frequently reached the stage wherein his eyes are wide open; he has learnt to speak truth to himself, and has built up no separating wall between himself and [Page 371] others. He is awake and alive; he is sensitive and frequently suffering. He wonders why apparently what the world calls happiness and peace have left him, and asks what is to be the outcome.

We who watch and guide on the inner side, watch with loving care all of you who struggle in the thick of the fray. We are like the General Headquarters staff who follow the course of the battle from a secure eminence. In our security lies your ultimate success, for we hold in our hands the solution of many problems, and apply that solution when the battle goes contrary. One thing always would I have you remember. It is of vital importance. It is this statement, that in the destruction of the form lies hid the secret of all evolution. Think not this is truism. You will see it in constant application and need to be prepared for its demonstration. The Masters utilize the form to the uttermost; They seek to work through it, imprisoning the life in confining walls for just as long as the purpose is served and the race instructed through that form. Then the time comes that the form no longer serves the purpose intended, when the structure atrophies, crystallises and becomes easily destructible. Its destruction then becomes the matter of greatest concern and usefulness, and it goes, whilst a new form takes its place. Watch and see if this be not so. Always the building of the form, always its utilisation for as long as possible, always the destruction of the form when it hinders and cramps the expanding light, always then the rapid reconstruction of a new form. Such has been the method since the commencement of the aeon.

-The Tibetan Master in A Treatise on White Magic

The Founding Principles

The Founding Principles of the United States

Enlightenment Philosophy:
- Key Figures: John Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Rousseau.
- Impact: Enlightenment ideas about reason, individual rights, and the social contract were foundational. Locke’s concepts of natural rights and government by consent directly influenced the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Classical Antiquity:
- Key Sources: Writings of ancient Greek and Roman philosophers and historians, such as Aristotle, Cicero, and Polybius.
- Impact: The Founders drew on classical ideas about democracy, republicanism, and civic virtue, which informed their vision of a balanced government.
British Constitutional Tradition:
- Key Documents: Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, and the writings of British legal theorists like William Blackstone.
- Impact: The British legal and constitutional tradition provided a framework for understanding rights and governance, influencing the development of American legal and political systems.
Freemasonry:
- Key Sources: On June 24, 1717, representatives from four London lodges met at the Goose and Gridiron Alehouse in St. Paul’s Churchyard, London, to form a Grand Lodge. This was the first time that multiple lodges came together to create a central governing body, which was a pivotal step in organizing Freemasonry into a structured institution.
- Impact: Freemasonry provided a network and shared values that resonated with Enlightenment ideals.

The Founding Fathers of the United States were influenced by these intellectual, cultural, and historical factors.. Freemasonry, a fraternal organization with roots in the late 16th to early 17th centuries, had a notable influence. While not all of the Founding Fathers were Freemasons, several prominent figures were members, and the principles of Freemasonry did influence their thinking and the founding documents.

The Ancient Origins of Freemasonry

Manly P. Hall, a well-known author and mystic, explored the origins and symbolism of Freemasonry in his works, particularly in “The Secret Teachings of All Ages.” Hall viewed Freemasonry as a repository of ancient wisdom and esoteric knowledge, tracing its roots back to ancient mystery schools and philosophical traditions. Here are some key points from Hall’s perspective on the origins of Masonry:

Ancient Mystery Schools: Hall suggested that Freemasonry is a continuation of the ancient mystery schools of Egypt, Greece, and Rome. These schools were centers of learning where initiates were taught spiritual and philosophical truths.
Symbolism and Allegory: He emphasized the importance of symbolism and allegory in Masonic rituals, viewing them as tools for conveying deeper truths and spiritual insights. Hall believed that Masonic symbols were derived from ancient traditions and held universal meanings.
Philosophical Lineage: Hall connected Freemasonry to a lineage of philosophical thought, including influences from Hermeticism, Neoplatonism, and other esoteric traditions. He saw Masonry as a bridge between ancient wisdom and modern spiritual practices.
Moral and Ethical Teachings: According to Hall, Freemasonry’s teachings focus on moral and ethical development, encouraging members to pursue personal growth and enlightenment. He believed that these teachings were aligned with the principles of the ancient mysteries.
Universal Brotherhood: Hall highlighted the Masonic ideal of universal brotherhood, which transcends religious and cultural differences. He saw this as a reflection of the ancient belief in the unity of humanity.

Overall, Manly P. Hall viewed Freemasonry as a custodian of ancient wisdom, preserving and transmitting esoteric knowledge through its rituals and teachings. His writings often explore the deeper philosophical and spiritual dimensions of Masonry, emphasizing its connection to a broader tradition of mystical and philosophical thought.

Key Founding Fathers Who Were Freemasons

**September 18, 1793** President **George Washington**, dressed in his Masonic apron, leveled the cornerstone of the United States Capitol with the traditional Masonic ceremony.
https://www.senate.gov/about/historic-buildings-spaces/capitol/washington-lays-capitol-cornerstone.htm

The Founding Fathers of the United States were influenced by a variety of intellectual, cultural, and historical factors.

George Washington: Perhaps the most famous Freemason among the Founding Fathers, Washington was initiated into the Fredericksburg Lodge in Virginia in 1752. He remained an active Mason throughout his life and participated in Masonic ceremonies, including the laying of the cornerstone of the U.S. Capitol.
Benjamin Franklin: Franklin was a prominent Freemason, having joined the St. John’s Lodge in Philadelphia in 1731. He was deeply involved in Masonic activities and even served as the Grand Master of the Masons in Pennsylvania. His diplomatic work in France also connected him with French Freemasons.
John Hancock: Known for his bold signature on the Declaration of Independence, Hancock was a member of the Masonic Lodge of St. Andrew in Boston.
Paul Revere: Famous for his midnight ride, Revere was an active Freemason and served as the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts.
James Monroe: The fifth President of the United States, Monroe was also a Freemason, initiated in Williamsburg Lodge No. 6 in Virginia.

Masonic Principles and Influence

Enlightenment Ideals: Freemasonry is closely associated with Enlightenment ideals such as reason, liberty, and the pursuit of knowledge. These principles align with the philosophical underpinnings of the American Revolution and the founding documents, including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Symbolism and Ritual: Masonic symbolism and rituals emphasize moral integrity, civic responsibility, and the importance of community, which resonated with the values of many Founding Fathers.
Networks and Connections: Freemasonry provided a network for influential individuals to meet, exchange ideas, and collaborate on political and social projects. This network may have facilitated communication and cooperation among the Founding Fathers.
Commitment to Religious Tolerance: Freemasonry promotes religious tolerance and the separation of church and state, principles that are reflected in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

While Freemasonry may not have been the primary influence on the Founding Fathers, its principles and networks played a role in shaping the ideas and relationships that contributed to the founding of the United States. The Masonic commitment to Enlightenment ideals, civic duty, and religious tolerance resonated with the broader intellectual and cultural currents of the time, helping to inform the development of the new nation.

Key Founding Mothers

The role of women in the founding era of the United States, while often overlooked in traditional narratives, was significant in various ways. Women contributed to the American Revolution and the early republic through their actions, writings, and influence. Here are some key aspects of their involvement:

Political Influence and Advocacy:
- Abigail Adams: As the wife of John Adams, Abigail Adams is well-known for her extensive correspondence with her husband, in which she advocated for women’s rights and famously urged him to “remember the ladies” when drafting new laws.
- Mercy Otis Warren: A political writer and propagandist, Warren wrote plays, poems, and essays that supported the Patriot cause and criticized British rule. Her works helped shape public opinion during the Revolution.
Support for the War Effort:
- Homemakers and Managers: Women managed farms and businesses in the absence of men who went to fight, ensuring economic stability and the production of necessary goods.
- Fundraising and Supplies: Women organized fundraising efforts and collected supplies for the Continental Army. The Ladies Association of Philadelphia, led by Esther DeBerdt Reed, raised significant funds to support the troops.
Direct Participation:
- Molly Pitcher: A nickname given to women who assisted soldiers on the battlefield, the most famous being Mary Ludwig Hays, who reportedly took her husband’s place at a cannon during the Battle of Monmouth.
- Deborah Sampson: Disguised as a man, Sampson enlisted in the Continental Army and served for over a year before her gender was discovered.
Intellectual Contributions:
- Phillis Wheatley: An enslaved African American poet, Wheatley gained international fame for her published works, which included themes of freedom and human rights.
- Judith Sargent Murray: An early advocate for women’s education and equality, Murray wrote essays arguing for women’s intellectual capabilities and the need for equal educational opportunities.
Social and Cultural Impact:
- Women played a crucial role in shaping the social and cultural fabric of the new nation, influencing family life, education, and community values.

While women did not have formal political power during the founding era, their contributions were vital to the success of the American Revolution and the establishment of the United States. Their efforts laid the groundwork for future movements toward gender equality and women’s rights.

The Shameful Three-Fifths Compromise

Slavery had a profound and lasting impact on early America, shaping its economic, social, and political landscapes.

Economic Impact:
- Foundation of Wealth: Slavery was integral to the economic development of the Southern colonies and states, where enslaved labor was the backbone of the agricultural economy, particularly in the production of cash crops like tobacco, rice, and cotton.
- Northern Involvement: While slavery was more prevalent in the South, Northern states also benefited economically through industries related to the slave trade, such as shipping, banking, and manufacturing of goods used on plantations.
Social and Cultural Impact:
- Racial Supremacy: Slavery entrenched ideologies of white supremacy, which justified the subjugation and dehumanization of African Americans. These ideologies persisted long after slavery was abolished.
- Cultural Contributions: Enslaved Africans and their descendants contributed significantly to American culture, including music, cuisine, language, and religious practices, which have become integral parts of the national identity.
Political Impact:
- Constitutional Compromises: The issue of slavery was a contentious topic during the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, leading to compromises such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which determined how enslaved people would be counted for representation and taxation.
- Sectional Tensions: Slavery was a major source of tension between Northern and Southern states, contributing to political conflicts that eventually led to the Civil War. Debates over the expansion of slavery into new territories and states were particularly divisive.
Human Impact:
- Suffering and Resistance: The human cost of slavery was immense, with millions of Africans forcibly brought to America and subjected to brutal conditions. Enslaved people resisted in various ways, from everyday acts of defiance to organized rebellions.
- Family and Community: Slavery disrupted family structures and communities, as enslaved people were often separated from their loved ones through sales and forced migrations.
Legacy:
- The legacy of slavery continues to affect American society, contributing to ongoing racial disparities and injustices. The struggle for civil rights and racial equality has been a central theme in American history, rooted in the nation’s early reliance on enslaved labor.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a pivotal agreement reached during the 1787 Constitutional Convention, which addressed how enslaved people would be counted for purposes of representation and taxation in the newly formed United States.

Background:
- During the Constitutional Convention, there was significant debate over how to count the population for determining representation in the House of Representatives and for taxation purposes.
- Southern states, where slavery was prevalent, wanted enslaved people to be fully counted to increase their representation in Congress, even though enslaved individuals had no rights or political power.
- Northern states, where slavery was less common, argued that enslaved people should not be counted at all for representation since they were not considered citizens with voting rights.
The Compromise:
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a middle ground that determined that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person for both representation and taxation.
- This formula increased the political power of slaveholding states without granting full representation based on their enslaved populations.
Implications:
- Political Power: The compromise gave Southern states more influence in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College than they would have had if only free persons were counted. This increased Southern political power in the federal government.
- Legitimization of Slavery: By incorporating the Three-Fifths Compromise into the Constitution, the institution of slavery was indirectly acknowledged and legitimized at the national level.
- Long-term Effects: The compromise contributed to sectional tensions between the North and South, as it highlighted the deep divisions over slavery. These tensions eventually culminated in the Civil War.

The specific historical records of the Constitutional Convention debates do not provide detailed accounts of whether other fractions for “a middle ground,” like one-half or two-thirds, were explicitly considered and debated before settling on three-fifths. The choice of three-fifths was likely influenced by a combination of factors, including political negotiation, precedent, and the need to reach a compromise that would be acceptable to both Northern and Southern states.

The three-fifths ratio was already familiar to some delegates due to its earlier proposal under the Articles of Confederation for tax purposes. This familiarity might have made it a more readily acceptable compromise during the Constitutional Convention.

While two-thirds super majorities are referenced in the Constitution for processes such as impeachment, treaty ratification, amendments, and overriding presidential vetoes, the 3:5 ratio stands out as a unique “middle ground” compromise concerning slavery.

Freemasons have long been acquainted with the Fibonacci series and the golden ratio (Phi), both of which are linked to aesthetics in nature and art. The 3:5 ratio, a component of this sequence, serves as a rough approximation of the reciprocal of Phi. However, there is no historical evidence that the golden ratio influenced the choice of the 3:5 ratio.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a significant and controversial element of the U.S. Constitution, reflecting the complex and often contradictory attitudes toward slavery in early America. It underscored the challenges of creating a unified nation while grappling with the moral and political issues surrounding slavery. Slavery was a fundamental aspect of early America, influencing its development and leaving a complex legacy that the country continues to grapple with today.

Freemasonry and slavery

Diverse Practices: Freemasonry is not a monolithic organization; it consists of numerous independent lodges and Grand Lodges worldwide. This means that practices and stances on issues like slavery could differ significantly from one lodge to another, especially in different countries or regions.
Moral Teachings: The core teachings of Freemasonry emphasize the equality of all men and the importance of moral and ethical behavior. These principles are inherently at odds with the institution of slavery, which is based on inequality and exploitation.
Historical Context: In the 18th and 19th centuries, when slavery was a contentious issue, some Masonic lodges in regions where slavery was prevalent did not explicitly oppose it. This was often due to the prevailing social and economic norms of the time, which influenced the attitudes of individual Masons and lodges.
Abolitionist Masons: Despite this, there were many Freemasons who were active abolitionists and who used their influence to advocate against slavery. These individuals often drew on Masonic principles of brotherhood and equality to support their stance.
Modern Perspective: Today, Freemasonry universally condemns slavery and upholds the principles of human rights and equality. The organization reflects a commitment to the ideals of freedom and justice for all individuals.

In summary, while the ideals of Freemasonry are fundamentally opposed to slavery, historical practices varied, and the organization’s stance evolved over time, aligning more closely with its core principles of universal brotherhood and equality.

While there were rumors and some interest in his potential membership, Abraham Lincoln never joined the Masonic fraternity. There are anecdotes suggesting that he considered joining at various points in his life, but he never took the steps to become a member. Despite this, many Freemasons have admired Lincoln for his leadership and principles, which align with the values of integrity and equality that Freemasonry espouses.

African American contributions
to the intellectual, cultural, and foundational aspects of the United States

African Americans have made significant contributions to the intellectual, cultural, and foundational aspects of the United States, even during the challenging periods of slavery and discrimination. Here are some key areas where their impact has been profound:

Intellectual Contributions:
- Phillis Wheatley: As the first African American woman to publish a book of poetry in 1773, Wheatley demonstrated the intellectual capabilities and literary talents of African Americans during a time when they were largely denied education.
- Benjamin Banneker: A self-taught astronomer and mathematician, Banneker is known for his role in surveying the boundaries of the original District of Columbia and for his almanacs, which included his astronomical calculations and social commentary.
Cultural Contributions:
- Music and Oral Traditions: African Americans brought rich musical traditions from Africa, which evolved into spirituals, blues, jazz, and other genres that have become integral to American culture.
- Folklore and Storytelling: African American oral traditions, including folktales and storytelling, have enriched American literature and cultural narratives.
Economic Contributions:
- Labor and Agriculture: Enslaved Africans and African Americans were crucial to the economic development of the United States, particularly in agriculture, where their labor underpinned the prosperity of the Southern economy.
- Craftsmanship and Skills: Many African Americans were skilled artisans, blacksmiths, and builders, contributing to the infrastructure and craftsmanship of early America.
Military Contributions:
- Revolutionary War: African Americans fought in the Revolutionary War, with figures like Crispus Attucks, who is often regarded as the first casualty of the Boston Massacre, symbolizing their early involvement in the fight for American independence.
- Civil War: African American soldiers played a crucial role in the Civil War, with nearly 200,000 serving in the Union Army and Navy, helping to secure the Union victory and the abolition of slavery.
Social and Political Contributions:
- Abolition Movement: African Americans were at the forefront of the abolition movement, with leaders like Frederick Douglass advocating for the end of slavery and equal rights.
- Civil Rights Advocacy: The early efforts of African Americans to secure their rights laid the groundwork for future civil rights movements.

These contributions highlight the integral role African Americans have played in shaping the United States, despite facing systemic challenges and discrimination. Their legacy is a testament to resilience, creativity, and the enduring fight for justice and equality.

African American leaders

African American leaders have played pivotal roles in shaping the history and culture of the United States, advocating for civil rights, social justice, and equality.

Frederick Douglass (1818–1895): A former enslaved person who became a leading abolitionist, Douglass was a powerful orator, writer, and advocate for the rights of African Americans and women. His autobiographies and speeches highlighted the injustices of slavery and called for equality.
Harriet Tubman (c. 1822–1913): Known as the “Moses of her people,” Tubman was a conductor on the Underground Railroad, leading many enslaved people to freedom. She also served as a spy and nurse during the Civil War and was an advocate for women’s suffrage.
W.E.B. Du Bois (1868–1963): A sociologist, historian, and civil rights activist, Du Bois was a co-founder of the NAACP and a prominent advocate for African American rights. His work, including “The Souls of Black Folk,” addressed issues of race and inequality.
Rosa Parks (1913–2005): Often called the “mother of the civil rights movement,” Parks’ refusal to give up her bus seat to a white passenger in Montgomery, Alabama, sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal event in the civil rights movement.
Martin Luther King Jr. (1929–1968): A Baptist minister and civil rights leader, King advocated for nonviolent resistance to racial segregation and discrimination. His leadership in events like the March on Washington and his “I Have a Dream” speech were instrumental in advancing civil rights.
Thurgood Marshall (1908–1993): As the first African American Supreme Court Justice, Marshall was a key figure in the legal fight against segregation. He argued and won the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education, which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
Maya Angelou (1928–2014): A renowned poet, author, and civil rights activist, Angelou’s works, including “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” explore themes of identity, racism, and resilience. She was also a powerful voice in the civil rights movement.
Barack Obama (1961–present): As the 44th President of the United States and the first African American to hold the office, Obama’s presidency marked a significant milestone in American history. His leadership focused on healthcare reform, economic recovery, and social justice.
Kamala Harris (1964–present): As the first female Vice President of the United States, and the first African American and South Asian American to hold the office, Harris represents a significant breakthrough in American politics. Her career as a senator, attorney general and 2024 presidential candidate has been marked by her advocacy for civil rights, criminal justice reform, and social equality.

These leaders, among many others, have made lasting impacts on American society, advocating for change and inspiring future generations to continue the fight for equality and justice.

Demographic trends indicate that by 2042, the United States is projected to become a “majority-minority” country. This means that non-Hispanic whites will comprise less than 50% of the population. This shift is due to the growing numbers of Hispanic, Black, Asian, and other minority groups.

As the country declares its independence from its national shadow, and the people increasingly embrace their dual identity as both Americans and world citizens in a multipolar world, the Dweller’s grip is weakened, revealing a promising future. Let the future stand revealed.
– Preamble to the New Age Declaration of Independence

The Dweller on the Threshold

The “Dweller on the Threshold” is a concept that represents an entity or force embodying the accumulated darkness and unresolved issues from an individual’s past lives. This entity is often seen as a barrier or challenge that one must confront and overcome on the spiritual path. It symbolizes the aspects of one’s personality that have not yet been integrated or redeemed by the soul.

The term was popularized by Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton in his novel “Zanoni” (1842), where it describes a phenomenon encountered by those on a spiritual journey. The Dweller is often depicted as an illusion or glamour that must be recognized and transcended to progress spiritually.

At a collective level, the Dweller can be portrayed as the Jungian shadow of a country caught between its past and future. For the United States, this Dweller is obstructing — as it always does —the course of evolution from a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) national identity to a multiracial consciousness.

Demographic trends indicate that by 2042, the United States is projected to become a “majority-minority” country. This means that non-Hispanic whites (WASP), will comprise less than 50% of the population. This shift is due to the growing numbers of Hispanic, Black, Asian, and other minority groups.

As the country declares its independence from its national shadow, and the people increasingly embrace their dual identity as both Americans and world citizens in a multipolar world, the Dweller’s grip is weakened, revealing a promising future. Let the future stand revealed.

Declaration of Independence

When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for the people of a country to break away from the chains with its national shadow and, according to God’s Plan, to assume its soul’s prerogatives and duties within the broader human community, a decent respect for its past history requires that they should declare the reasons which impel them to such action.

We hold the truth of these spiritual Laws and Principles to be self-evident,

The Law of Right Human Relations.
The Principle of Goodwill.
The Law of Group Endeavor.
The Principle of Unanimity.
The Law of Spiritual Approach.
The Principle of Essential Divinity.

The principle of essential divinity holds that all men and women are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights rooted in universal laws and principles. Essential divinity, unanimously expressed as goodwill that enables right human relations, can always be trusted to arise to the call of the enduring spirit of humanity in its quest and spiritual approach for the Good, the Beautiful and the True.

Liberty embodies the acknowledgment of right human relations, freely adjusted, willingly embraced and driven by a sense of responsibility. As a fundamental aspect of human dignity and autonomy, liberty represents the initial revelation bestowed upon humanity regarding the nature of God’s Will. The freedom to explore, create, and contribute to the world is part of the divine plan, enabling individuals to realize their potential and contribute to the greater good. When individuals are free to seek truth, wisdom, and a deeper understanding of the divine, the pursuit of knowledge and self-discovery reflects God’s intention for humanity to grow and evolve.

Equality stems from a right sense of proportion and understanding of the spiritual yet natural laws of rebirth, and of cause and effect. These natural laws acknowledge the age, experience, and development of a soul.

Therefore, the true meaning of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” is herein revisited and recognized as a group endeavor that gradually reveals humanity’s fundamental theme of brotherhood and freedom. “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” are rooted on the divine origin of life, leading to a true expression of divinity through brotherly love and freedom. Only by embracing this vision can we hope to restore true and lasting peace on Earth, allowing for the attainment of happiness, personal fulfillment, and well-being.

To secure these rights, new forms of governance must be instituted, governments deriving their just powers from the free and well-informed consent of the governed.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of this Country, solemnly publish and declare,

That these United States of America are, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent of its Shadow;
that we are Absolved from all Allegiance to It, and that all political connection to this Shadow is and ought to be totally dissolved; and
that as a Free and Independent Country, it has full Power to do all Acts and Things which Independent Countries may of right do.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Adapted from: National Archives

The Dweller

The Dweller, or Shadow, in this context, symbolizes the societal challenges and internal conflicts that arise during this transition. It embodies the fears, resistance, and unresolved issues that must be confronted and integrated for growth to occur. Just as in spiritual journeys, society must overcome this spiritual threshold to move beyond self-serving motives towards a more unified, altruistic existence.

To progress, it is crucial for this society to acknowledge and address the influence of the Dweller. By doing so, it can dismantle the barriers that uphold divisiveness and the pursuit of selfish happiness. People have the right to pursue their own paths to happiness, as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others. This involves fostering dialogue, promoting empathy, and encouraging policies that reflect higher values. Only by overcoming these challenges can society evolve towards greater harmony and self-fulfillment, fulfilling its potential for both individual and collective enlightenment.

Temporary setbacks are a natural part of the Hero’s journey in its quest to overcome its Dweller. The current hold of the MAGA ideology over a majority of the U.S. electorate reflects a stage of spiritual development. However, we must remember that this is merely a temporary crisis, characteristic of the Hero’s journey—a collective struggle of a Nation’s Soul confronting its Shadow. Together, as One Humanity, we face this challenge and look toward a promising future.

The Mantra of Unification

The souls of all are one and I am one with them.

I seek to love, not hate;
I seek to serve and not exact due service;
I seek to heal, not hurt.

Let pain bring due reward of light and love.
Let the soul control the outer form, and life and all events
And bring to light the love that underlies the happenings of the time.

Let vision come and insight.
Let the future stand revealed.
Let inner union demonstrate and outer cleavages be gone.
Let love prevail. Let all people love.

The Hero’s Journey

Campbell’s Hero’s Journey is a narrative framework identified by Joseph Campbell in his work “The Hero with a Thousand Faces.” It outlines a common pattern found in many myths and stories across different cultures. The Hero’s Journey consists of several stages, typically including:

The Ordinary World: The hero’s normal life before the adventure begins.
The Call to Adventure: The hero is presented with a challenge or quest.
Refusal of the Call: The hero hesitates or refuses the challenge due to fear or other reasons.
Meeting the Mentor: The hero encounters a mentor who provides guidance or tools.
Crossing the Threshold: The hero commits to the journey and leaves the ordinary world.
Tests, Allies, and Enemies: The hero faces challenges, makes allies, and confronts enemies.
Approach to the Inmost Cave: The hero approaches a major challenge in the journey.
The Ordeal: The hero faces a significant crisis or challenge.
The Reward: After overcoming the ordeal, the hero receives a reward or achieves the goal.
The Road Back: The hero begins the return journey to the ordinary world.
The Resurrection: The hero faces a final test where everything is at stake.
Return with the Elixir: The hero returns home transformed, with new wisdom or power to benefit others.

The Nature of Power in National and World Affairs

Tangible (Material) Power

Political Power

Financial Power

Military Power

Technological Power

Ideational Power

Moral Authority

Cultural Influence

Intellectual Leadership

Interactions Between Material and Ideational Power

Structural and Systemic Power

Challenges and Future Trends in Power

Conclusion

Purpose in the Use of Power

Power for the Common Good

Selfish & Nationalistic Wielding of Power

Ethical Implications

The Impact of Purpose on Legitimacy and Effectiveness

Purpose and the Interplay of Power Dimensions

Shaping Perceptions and Global Outcomes

Israel’s Military Actions in Gaza

Political Power and Physics

Let Light and Love and POWER restore the Plan on Earth

Five Affirmations

From the center which we call the human raceLet the Plan of Love and Light work outAnd may it seal the door where evil dwells.

Closing the Door to Evil

Taking the Higher Ground

Transforming Forces

The Light of Truth

The Paradox

Resistance to Post-Truth

Affirming Truth

Living in the Light

A Master Speaks on Non-Resistance to Evil

Let Light and Love and POWER restore the Plan on Earth!

Wisdom in Times of Chaos

The Body Politic and the Soul of Nations

A Higher Plan, a Greater Purpose

The Purpose of Crises

Chaos as Prelude

The Death of the Old, the Birth of the New

A Life of Wisdom Restored

Toward a Simple, Harmonious Future

The Dance of Chaos and Creation

The Butterfly and the Collapse

Cracks in the Ice

Fractals of Interconnectedness

Chaos as Midwife

Emergent Realities

Order Hiding in Chaos

Role of Minority

Consensus Rules

Unregulated Capitalism: A System of Servitude and Environmental Exploitation

Labour 8 – Destroying the Lernaean Hydra

Eradicating Racial Supremacy: Lessons from History and Health

On Democracy

The United States of America

Historical timeline

Fatal Mistakes

Freemasonry and slavery

Historical Context

Main Message

A Future Revealed

Written in 2125

Historical Context

Main Message

Declaration of Independence

Aquarian Pledge

The New Intuitive Sense

Intuition: Integrating on Time

Another Missed Opportunity?

Ideals Reveal the Soul of a Nation

On Happiness, Joy and Bliss

The Founding Principles of the United States

The Ancient Origins of Freemasonry

Key Founding Fathers Who Were Freemasons

Masonic Principles and Influence

Key Founding Mothers

The Shameful Three-Fifths Compromise

Let Light and Love and POWER
restore the Plan on Earth

From the center which we call the human race
Let the Plan of Love and Light work out
And may it seal the door where evil dwells.

Let Light and Love and POWER
restore the Plan on Earth!

Unregulated Capitalism:
A System of Servitude and Environmental Exploitation

Eradicating Racial Supremacy:
Lessons from History and Health

African American contributions
to the intellectual, cultural, and foundational aspects of the United States