Just as clean air and water are essential for life, politics free of misinformation — and outright lies — is crucial for preserving democracy. Accountability mechanisms must ensure that political figures are answerable for deceit, with independent oversight by subject matter experts. Civic education is vital in cultivating an informed electorate capable of discerning truth from falsehood. Active citizen engagement is crucial for challenging deception and fostering truthfulness in politics.
While this argument may sound utopian, resignation to deceit is far worse. We must advocate for a political environment where truth guides governance. Striving for truth is essential for maintaining a vibrant and healthy democratic future.
A New Ecology of Democracy
One of the merits of Jedediah Purdy’s “Two Cheers for Politics” is that he does not take democracy for granted. He knows it needs new forms of defense, and he challenges the political structures we once thought were working just fine.
Jedediah Purdy presents several key arguments about democracy in the United States:
- Introduction to Democracy’s Challenges: Discusses the current state of democracy, its perceived fragility, and the need for renewed understanding and defense.
- Critique of Political Structures: Analyzes the flaws in existing political systems, focusing on the Senate, electoral college, and Supreme Court, and how they hinder true democratic representation.
- Proposals for Constitutional Change: Explores the need for easier constitutional amendments and regular revisions to align governance with contemporary public will.
- The Role of Social Solidarity: Emphasizes the importance of social trust and equality in sustaining democracy, critiquing economic inequality and concentrated power.
- Historical and Philosophical Context: Provides a tour through political philosophy, highlighting thinkers like Hobbes, Rousseau, and others, to frame democracy as both a historical and evolving concept.
- Vision for Democratic Revival: Concludes with a hopeful vision for democracy, advocating for collective action and social reconstruction as means to shape a better future.
Purdy presents a compelling case for enhancing democracy through social solidarity and constitutional revisions. A critical element that would further strengthen his argument is the integration of a meritocratic approach (wise subject matter experts) within democratic systems. This addition could address the tension between informed and uninformed opinions, ensuring that democratic consensus is both equitable and informed.
Democracy thrives on the principle of equality, granting every citizen a voice. Yet, this egalitarian approach often overlooks the disparity in knowledge and expertise among individuals. By incorporating meritocracy, we could ensure that policy decisions are guided by those with the necessary expertise, balancing the weight of opinions so that well-informed voices are heard alongside popular sentiment.
The potential benefits of a meritocratic democracy include more efficient governance and informed decision-making. Experts in relevant fields could provide insights that lead to policies reflecting both public will and practical considerations. This could help prevent the pitfalls of populism, where emotionally charged but potentially uninformed decisions gain traction.
However, integrating meritocracy into democracy is not without challenges. The primary concern is maintaining the democratic ethos of equal representation while acknowledging expertise. This can be overcome by creating advisory bodies composed of experts whose role is to inform legislative processes. These bodies would work alongside elected officials to draft and refine policy proposals, ensuring they are both scientifically sound and publicly accountable.
Moreover, education plays a vital role in this model, as an informed electorate is essential for discerning the value of expert advice. Investing in education systems that promote critical thinking and civic knowledge can empower citizens to engage more meaningfully in democratic processes.
In conclusion, adding a meritocratic dimension to democracy would enhance its effectiveness, aligning decision-making with both wise expertise and public interest. By carefully balancing the input of wise experts with broad-based democratic participation, we can create a system that is both fair and functional, paving the way for a more robust democratic future.
Those who would reject Purdy’s radical proposal still need to grapple with the crisis of representation that our Constitution creates for democracy. To look only at our presidential election system, a flip of about 32,000 votes in three states and one congressional district would have given victory in the electoral college to the candidate who lost the popular vote by more than 7 million ballots. That problem is not going away.
Discover more from Hierarchical Democracy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
